Modelling of spatio-temporal interaction for video quality assessment

Video services have appeared in the recent years due to advances in video coding and convergence to IP networks. As these emerging services mature, the ability to deliver adequate quality to end-users becomes increasingly important. However, the transmission of digital video over error-prone and bandwidth-limited networks may produce spatial and temporal visual distortions in the decoded video. Both types of impairments affect the perceived video quality. In this paper, we examine the impact of spatio-temporal artefacts in video and especially how both types of errors interact to affect the overall perceived video quality. We show that the impact of the spatial quality on overall video quality is dependent on the temporal quality and vice-versa. We observe that the introduction of a degradation in one modality affects the quality perception in the other modality, and this change is larger for high-quality conditions than for low-quality conditions. The contribution of the spatial quality to the overall quality is found to be greater than the contribution of the temporal quality. Our results also indicate that low-motion talking-head content can be more negatively affected by temporal frame freezing artefacts than other general type of content with higher motion. Based on the results of a subjective experiment, we propose an objective model to predict overall video quality by integrating the contributions of a spatial quality and a temporal quality. The non-linear model shows a very high linear correlation with subjective data.

[1]  Hong Ren Wu,et al.  A novel objective no-reference metric for digital video quality assessment , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  Efficient Reduced-Reference Video Quality Meter , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[3]  N. Anderson A Functional Theory of Cognition , 1996 .

[4]  Demin Wang,et al.  Rate control for improved picture quality in low-bit-rate video coding , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  John G. Beerends,et al.  The Influence of Video Quality on Perceived Audio Quality and Vice Versa , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas Stockhammer,et al.  Subjective assessment of H.264-AVC video for low-bitrate multimedia messaging services , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[9]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[10]  Zhenghua Yu,et al.  Vision-model-based impairment metric to evaluate blocking artifacts in digital video , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  Subjective video quality evaluation for multimedia applications , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Hocine Cherifi,et al.  Predicting subjective video quality from separated spatial and temporal assessment , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics , 2005 .

[14]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation , 2005 .

[15]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[16]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Subjective quality evaluation of low-bit-rate video , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Kjell Brunnström,et al.  Stabilising viewing distances in subjective assessment of mobile video , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Daniele D. Giusto,et al.  A multi-factors approach for image quality assessment based on a human visual system model , 2006, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[19]  Jerry D. Gibson,et al.  Handbook of Image and Video Processing , 2000 .

[20]  Kjell Brunnström,et al.  Subjective Multimedia Quality Assessment , 2006, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[21]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  Temporal Aspect of Perceived Quality in Mobile Video Broadcasting , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[22]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[23]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Structural Similarity Metric for Video Based on Motion Models , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[24]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  Reduced-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Discriminative Local Harmonic Strength With Motion Consideration , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[25]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  No-reference temporal quality metric for video impaired by frame freezing artefacts , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[26]  Jihwan Choe,et al.  Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[27]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual quality and objective quality measurements of compressed videos , 2006, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[28]  D. S. Hands,et al.  A basic multimedia quality model , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.