The significance of highway preservation and budget allocation constraints have motivated development of sensing technologies for collecting accurate and detailed traffic information. While static scales had been used widely to collect vehicle weights, Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) systems have been focused on utilizing state-of-the-art technologies to collect various types of traffic data. These systems continuously collect data, including gross vehicle weights (GVW), vehicle speeds, axle loads, and vehicle classification, as vehicles travel over a set of sensors without interruption of traffic flows. Many up-to-date pavement design protocols require traffic input, and in particular the new AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) requires axle load, axle spacing, and Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT) obtained from WIM. This paper identifies different WIM sensing technologies, with particular emphasis on piezoelectric, bending plate, load cell, and quartz piezoelectric sensor systems. It qualitatively compares the advantages and disadvantages of these WIM systems, with respect to cost, accuracy, applicability, reliability and sensitivity. For the covering abstarct of this conference see ITRD number E216511.
[1]
Lawrence A. Klein,et al.
Sensor Technologies and Data Requirements for Its
,
2001
.
[2]
Mingguang Wu,et al.
An overview of research on weigh-in-motion system
,
2004,
Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788).
[3]
Guk-Rwang Won.
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1987
.
[4]
Ahmed Shalaby,et al.
Evaluation of weigh-in-motion in Manitoba
,
1999
.
[5]
Carl T. Haas,et al.
Evaluation of Quartz Piezoelectric Weigh-in-Motion Sensors
,
2006
.
[6]
Andrew J. Pratt,et al.
Weigh In Motion Technology - Economics and Performance
,
1998
.