Effects of age on aneural regeneration of soleus muscle in rat.

1. The ability of autografted soleus muscles to regenerate without innervation was investigated in young (two groups: 17 days or 35 g and 5 weeks or 100 g) and old (10 weeks or 300 g and 19 months or 700 g) rats. 2. Tetanic force and fibre area of the regenerated muscles were followed in 35, 100 and 300 g rats and found to reach a maximum 10‐15 days after the operation and then declined. 3. Maximal tetanic force and fibre area were greater in old than in young rats; the largest increase was seen between 100 and 300 g rats. The relaxation phase of the twitch became shorter in the 700 g animals. The force per cross‐sectional area appeared to fall with age. The length of the new fibres, inferred from the width of the length‐force curve, increased only slightly with age. 4. Ten days after grafting, autophagocytosis of necrotic fibres was completed in young but not in old rats. The new fibres in young rats had one central nucleus per cross‐section and fibre size was unimodally distributed; fibres in old rats had multiple internal nuclei and the size distribution was bimodal due to the presence of large fibres. 5. Previous results indicating greater muscle regeneration in young than in old rats may reflect more vigorous reinnervation in young animals rather than a greater myogenic potential. Increased fibre size of regenerated muscles of old compared with young rats may be attributed to the larger amount of necrotic material which is mitogenic for satellite cells, or to age‐dependent changes of the expression of cell adhesion molecules. Enhanced lateral fusion of myotubes would give rise to large fibres with multiple internal nuclei.

[1]  B. Reinking The effect of aging on skeletal muscle regeneration , 1996 .

[2]  E. Bock,et al.  The ability to re-express polysialylated NCAM in soleus muscle after denervation is reduced in aged rats compared to young adult rats , 1995, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Schmalbruch,et al.  Immunocytochemistry of M‐cadherin in mature and regenerating rat muscle , 1994, The Anatomical record.

[4]  E. Schultz,et al.  Skeletal muscle satellite cells. , 1994, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[5]  L. Landmesser,et al.  Regulation and activity-dependence of N-cadherin, NCAM isoforms, and polysialic acid on chick myotubes during development , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  F. Walsh,et al.  The cell adhesion molecule M-cadherin is specifically expressed in developing and regenerating, but not denervated skeletal muscle. , 1993, Development.

[7]  E. Bock,et al.  Age-related changes in expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule in skeletal muscle: a comparative study of newborn, adult and aged rats. , 1993, The Biochemical journal.

[8]  R. Cuppini Age-related changes in maturation of regenerated motor innervation , 1993, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[9]  J. Covault,et al.  Neural regulation of N-cadherin gene expression in developing and adult skeletal muscle , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Nicolet,et al.  N-cadherin and N-CAM in myoblast fusion: compared localisation and effect of blockade by peptides and antibodies. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[11]  M Ringwald,et al.  Expression of M-cadherin, a member of the cadherin multigene family, correlates with differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. P. White,et al.  Neuromuscular adaptations to cross-reinnervation in 12- and 29-mo-old Fischer 344 rats. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  N. Robbins,et al.  Motor nerve terminal restoration after focal destruction in young and old mice , 1990, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Bischoff Cell cycle commitment of rat muscle satellite cells , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  S. McElwee,et al.  A role for the Ca2(+)-dependent adhesion molecule, N-cadherin, in myoblast interaction during myogenesis. , 1990, Experimental cell research.

[16]  J. Faulkner,et al.  Muscle transplantation between young and old rats: age of host determines recovery. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  U. Carraro,et al.  Maturation, Dystrophic Changes and the Continuous Production of Fibers in Skeletal Muscle Regenerating in the Absence of Nerve , 1987, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[18]  J. Sanes,et al.  Distribution of N-CAM in synaptic and extrasynaptic portions of developing and adult skeletal muscle , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  E. Schultz,et al.  Age‐related differences in absolute numbers of skeletal muscle satellite cells , 1983, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  G. Edelman,et al.  Kinetics of homophilic binding by embryonic and adult forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  H. Schmalbruch The morphology of regeneration of skeletal muscles in the rat. , 1976, Tissue & cell.

[22]  B. Carlson,et al.  Regeneration and transplantation of muscles in old rats and between young and old rats. , 1976, Life sciences.

[23]  E. Gutmann,et al.  The influence of age on the course of reinnervation of muscle. , 1961, Gerontologia.