Hysterectomy use: the correspondence between self-reports and hospital records.

Studies of the relationship between hysterectomy use and sociodemographic factors tend to use self-reported data. In the current study, data were collected from a representative sample of US women who have been prospectively followed since 1971. Hysterectomy status was obtained by self-report and from hospital records. Although these two measures of hysterectomy were highly related, more women reported hysterectomy than could be confirmed by hospital records. The two measures showed similar associations between several obstetric and demographic characteristics and hysterectomy status, suggesting that the use of self-reported hysterectomy data does not bias analyses of potentially associated factors.

[1]  A. Coulter,et al.  The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study , 1992 .

[2]  M. Bracher,et al.  Correlates of hysterectomy in Australia. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[3]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Women Who Have Had a Hysterectomy in a Community Survey , 1991, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[4]  K. Matthews,et al.  Characteristics of women with hysterectomy. , 1989, Maturitas.

[5]  R. Horwitz,et al.  Problems and proposals for interview data in epidemiological research. , 1985, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  A. Coulter,et al.  Socioeconomic variations in the use of common surgical operations. , 1985, British medical journal.

[7]  P. Langenberg,et al.  The socioeconomic correlates of hysterectomies in the United States. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[8]  D. Thompson,et al.  Prevalence of prior hysterectomy in the Seattle-Tacoma area. , 1980, American journal of public health.