Diagnostic performance of receptor-specific surgical specimen staining correlates with receptor expression level

Abstract. Intraoperative margin assessment is imperative to cancer cure but is a continued challenge to successful surgery. Breast conserving surgery is a relevant example, where a cosmetically improved outcome is gained over mastectomy, but re-excision is required in >25  %   of cases due to positive or closely involved margins. Clinical translation of margin assessment modalities that must directly contact the patient or required administered contrast agents are time consuming and costly to move from bench to bedside. Tumor resections provide a unique surgical opportunity to deploy margin assessment technologies including contrast agents on the resected tissues, substantially shortening the path to the clinic. However, staining of resected tissues is plagued by nonspecific uptake. A ratiometric imaging approach where matched targeted and untargeted probes are used for staining has demonstrated substantially improved biomarker quantification over staining with conventional targeted contrast agents alone. Our group has developed an antibody-based ratiometric imaging technology using fluorescently labeled, spectrally distinct targeted and untargeted antibody probes termed dual-stain difference specimen imaging (DDSI). Herein, the targeted biomarker expression level and pattern are evaluated for their effects on DDSI diagnostic potential. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression level was correlated to DDSI diagnostic potential, which was found to be robust to spatial pattern expression variation. These results highlight the utility of DDSI for accurate margin assessment of freshly resected tumor specimens.

[1]  Brittany Lapin,et al.  Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010. , 2014, JAMA surgery.

[2]  L. Newman,et al.  Predictors of Re-excision among Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  A. Saarela,et al.  Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: A prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology , 1997, Journal of surgical oncology.

[4]  Connor W. Barth,et al.  Polymeric Micelles as Carriers for Nerve-Highlighting Fluorescent Probe Delivery , 2015, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[5]  S. Singletary Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[6]  Qian Yang,et al.  High-speed Raman-encoded molecular imaging of freshly excised tissue surfaces with topically applied SERRS nanoparticles , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  Jeffrey L Myers,et al.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. , 2012, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Sheldon M. Feldman,et al.  Intra-operative Touch Preparation Cytology; Does It Have a Role in Re-excision Lumpectomy? , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Stephanie A. Kennedy,et al.  Rapid noninvasive optical imaging of tissue composition in breast tumor margins. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[12]  Matthew Bogyo,et al.  Optimization of a Protease Activated Probe for Optical Surgical Navigation. , 2017, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[13]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Topical dual-stain difference imaging for rapid intra-operative tumor identification in fresh specimens. , 2013, Optics letters.

[14]  J. Cendan,et al.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. , 2009, JAMA.

[16]  M. Trivella,et al.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  E. Wiley,et al.  Evaluation of Resection Margins in Breast Conservation Therapy: The Pathology Perspective—Past, Present, and Future , 2012, International journal of surgical oncology.

[18]  Adam K Glaser,et al.  Raman-Encoded Molecular Imaging with Topically Applied SERS Nanoparticles for Intraoperative Guidance of Lumpectomy. , 2017, Cancer research.

[19]  Christopher H Contag,et al.  Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection. , 2017, Cancer research.

[20]  Milind Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Quantitative molecular phenotyping with topically applied SERS nanoparticles for intraoperative guidance of breast cancer lumpectomy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Connor W. Barth,et al.  Direct Administration of Nerve-Specific Contrast to Improve Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy , 2017, Theranostics.

[22]  Xiaochun Xu,et al.  Microscopic investigation of" topically applied nanoparticles for molecular imaging of fresh tissue surfaces , 2018, Journal of biophotonics.

[23]  P. Low,et al.  Carbonic Anhydrase IX-Targeted Near-Infrared Dye for Fluorescence Imaging of Hypoxic Tumors. , 2018, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[24]  L. Jacobs,et al.  Annals of Surgical Oncology 15(5):1271–1272 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9766-0 Positive Margins: The Challenge Continues for Breast Surgeons , 2008 .

[25]  Peter L. Choyke,et al.  Rapid Cancer Detection by Topically Spraying a γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase–Activated Fluorescent Probe , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[26]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer--bigger is not better. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  M. Gnant,et al.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer. , 2009, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  Lee G. Wilke,et al.  Intraoperative Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section Pathology for Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[29]  P. Low,et al.  Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: first in-human results , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[30]  Stephanie Daignault,et al.  Is intraoperative frozen section analysis of reexcision specimens of value in preventing reoperation in breast-conserving therapy? , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.

[31]  Yu Winston Wang,et al.  In vivo multiplexed molecular imaging of esophageal cancer via spectral endoscopy of topically applied SERS nanoparticles. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[32]  M. Nakano,et al.  Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer , 2015, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Paul Ellis,et al.  Dissecting the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Scott C. Davis,et al.  Optimizing fresh specimen staining for rapid identification of tumor biomarkers during surgery , 2017, Theranostics.

[35]  Keith Paulsen,et al.  Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Profile for Single-Dose Injection of ABY-029: a Fluorescent Anti-EGFR Synthetic Affibody Molecule for Human Use , 2017, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[36]  Nimmi Ramanujam,et al.  Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[37]  H. Feigelson,et al.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. , 2012, JAMA.

[38]  Jonathan T. C. Liu,et al.  Surgical Guidance via Multiplexed Molecular Imaging of Fresh Tissues Labeled With SERS-Coded Nanoparticles , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.