Validation of the association of the cystic duct fibrosis score with surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: The level of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy might be predictable based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings indicative of cholecystitis severity. Several scales for laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been developed, but most are complex, unverified, and not widely adopted. This study evaluated the association of the cystic duct fibrosis score (range, 0–3) with surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Between July 2018 and November 2018, 163 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases were retrospectively reviewed at a single center. Patients’ demographics, preoperative laboratory data, operation time, complications, hospital stay, and cholecystitis severity grade were investigated. We also evaluated the associations of the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 and the Parkland grading scale with the cystic fibrosis score. Results: The cystic duct fibrosis score was associated with preoperative white blood cells (p<0.001), preoperative platelet count (p=0.046), preoperative total bilirubin (p<0.004), preoperative C-reactive protein (p<0.001), operation time (p<0.001), cystic duct ligation time (p=0.002), estimated blood loss (p<0.001), postoperative complication (p=0.004), open conversion (p<0.001), and common bile duct injury (p=0.010). The cystic duct fibrosis score was also correlated with the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 and the Parkland grading scale (p<0.001). The cystic duct ligation time predicted the cystic duct fibrosis score and the Parkland grading scale, but not the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. Conclusion: As a simple indicator of cholecystitis severity, the cystic duct fibrosis score can predict the surgical difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

[1]  T. Schroeppel,et al.  Multicenter validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading scale for acute cholecystitis. , 2021, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[2]  H. Ohdan,et al.  Validation of the Tokyo guideline 2018 treatment proposal for acute cholecystitis from a single‐center retrospective analysis , 2019, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[3]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis. , 2019, American journal of surgery.

[4]  M. Zeeshan,et al.  Evaluating the Relevance of the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Cholecystitis. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  Nadeem N. Haddad,et al.  Validation of the AAST EGS acute cholecystitis grade and comparison with the Tokyo guidelines , 2018, Surgery.

[6]  D. Gouma,et al.  Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos) , 2018, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[7]  D. Gouma,et al.  Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis , 2018, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[8]  T. Takada Tokyo Guidelines 2018: updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis/acute cholecystitis , 2018, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[9]  K. Davis,et al.  Validation of a new American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) anatomic severity grading system for acute cholecystitis , 2017, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[10]  T. Morikawa,et al.  Risk factors for difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in grade II acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo guidelines 2013 , 2017, BMC Surgery.

[11]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis. , 2017, American journal of surgery.

[12]  T. Takada,et al.  Validation of TG13 severity grading in acute cholecystitis: Japan‐Taiwan collaborative study for acute cholecystitis , 2017, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[13]  T. Hibi,et al.  An opportunity in difficulty: Japan–Korea–Taiwan expert Delphi consensus on surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2017, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[14]  S. Choi,et al.  What are the appropriate indicators of surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Results from a Japan‐Korea‐Taiwan multinational survey , 2016, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[15]  A. Tosetto,et al.  Comparison between different D‐Dimer cutoff values to assess the individual risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: analysis of results obtained in the DULCIS study , 2016, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[16]  L. Ansaloni,et al.  Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system , 2015, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[17]  A. Augustine,et al.  A comprehensive predictive scoring method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2014, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[18]  D. Gouma,et al.  New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines , 2012, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[19]  M. Hiyoshi,et al.  Verification of Tokyo Guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis , 2012, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[20]  F. Brunetti,et al.  WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis Ansaloni , L . 2016-06-14 , 2022 .