Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: Much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf (2003), Muthén (2003), and Cudeck and Henly (2003)

The comments on D. J. Bauer and P. J. Curran (2003) share 2 common themes. The 1st theme is that model-checking procedures may be capable of distinguishing between mixtures of normal and homogeneous nonnormal distributions. Although useful for assessing model quality, it is argued here that currently available procedures may not always help discern between these 2 possibilities. The 2nd theme is that even if these 2 possibilities cannot be distinguished, a growth mixture model may still provide useful insights into the data. It is argued here that whereas this may be true for the scientific goals of description and prediction, the acceptance of a model that fundamentally misrepresents the underlying data structure may be less useful in pursuit of the goal of explanation.

[1]  R. Cudeck,et al.  A realistic perspective on pattern representation in growth data: comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). , 2003, Psychological methods.

[2]  D. Rindskopf.  Mixture or homogeneous? Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). , 2003, Psychological methods.

[3]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). , 2003, Psychological methods.

[4]  Daniel J Bauer,et al.  Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[5]  D. Rubin,et al.  Testing the number of components in a normal mixture , 2001 .

[6]  David W. Scott,et al.  From Kernels to Mixtures , 2001, Technometrics.

[7]  B. Muthén.  Latent Variable Mixture Modeling , 2001 .

[8]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling , 2001 .

[9]  D S Nagin,et al.  Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: a group-based method. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[10]  Linda M. Collins,et al.  New methods for the analysis of change , 2001 .

[11]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling. , 2001 .

[12]  B. Muthén,et al.  Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. , 2000, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[13]  B. Muthén,et al.  Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM Algorithm , 1999, Biometrics.

[14]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach , 1999 .

[15]  G. Verbeke,et al.  A Linear Mixed-Effects Model with Heterogeneity in the Random-Effects Population , 1996 .

[16]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[17]  R J Carroll,et al.  Analysis of tomato root initiation using a normal mixture distribution. , 1995, Biometrics.

[18]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Posterior Predictive $p$-Values , 1994 .

[19]  K. Land,et al.  AGE, CRIMINAL CAREERS, AND POPULATION HETEROGENEITY: SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF A NONPARAMETRIC, MIXED POISSON MODEL* , 1993 .

[20]  A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorder: The FAST Track Program , 1992, Development and Psychopathology.

[21]  K. Roeder,et al.  Residual diagnostics for mixture models , 1992 .

[22]  S. Hershberger,et al.  A Simple Rule for Generating Equivalent Models in Covariance Structure Modeling. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[23]  T. Micceri.  The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. , 1989 .

[24]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[25]  T. Ferguson.  BAYESIAN DENSITY ESTIMATION BY MIXTURES OF NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS , 1983 .

[26]  A. Cohen,et al.  Finite Mixture Distributions , 1982 .

[27]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.