Analyzing Brexit: Implications for the Electricity System of Great Britain

The UK’s exit from the European Union (EU) has potential ramifications for the country’s electricity sector, given its increasing interlinkage with other EU electricity systems. Brexit could hamper the development toward higher market integration and the realization of new interconnector projects. Moreover, a fall in the value of the Pound, resulting from Brexit in the medium term, could also affect the electricity trading structure. Combining a European electricity market model and a multi-criteria decision analysis tool, this study assesses the implications of Brexit for the electricity market of Great Britain (hereafter GB) for 2030, from the perspective of (i) political decision makers, (ii) electricity consumers, and (iii) producers. Results indicate that the implications of Brexit depend on the future development of the GB electricity system and on the objectives of the respective stakeholders. Possible opportunities brought by Brexit under a low-carbon trajectory contrast with greater challenges and tradeoffs between stakeholders under alternative power system development paths. Despite increased British autonomy in energy and climate matters, there remains interdependency between British and EU energy policy.

[1]  Jan Horst Keppler,et al.  Determining Optimal Interconnection Capacity on the Basis of Hourly Demand And Supply Functions of Electricity , 2018, The Energy Journal.

[2]  Josefin Wangel,et al.  Transmission transitions: Barriers, drivers, and institutional governance implications of Nordic transmission grid development , 2016 .

[3]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Haris Ch. Doukas,et al.  Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  E. Georgopoulou,et al.  A multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: The case of renewable energy option , 1997 .

[6]  Thomas Huld,et al.  Medium-term demand for European cross-border electricity transmission capacity , 2013 .

[7]  H. White.  A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy , 2014 .

[8]  Navroz K. Dubash,et al.  Measuring the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation , 2014 .

[9]  Brigitte Knopf,et al.  Quantifying the Long�?Term Economic Benefits of European Electricity System Integration , 2014 .

[10]  Gilberto Montibeller,et al.  Combining scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis in practice , 2006 .

[11]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[12]  Alec Morton,et al.  Extending the use of scenario planning and MCDA for the evaluation of strategic options , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  José Ramón San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry , 2012 .

[14]  Tamer Eren,et al.  Risk Based Maintenance in the Hydroelectric Power Plants , 2019, Energies.

[15]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective , 2015 .

[16]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[17]  Augustine O. Ifelebuegu,et al.  Brexit and Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union: Implications for UK Energy Policy and Security , 2017 .

[18]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations , 2017 .

[19]  Vladimir Parail,et al.  Properties of Electricity Prices and the Drivers of Interconnector Revenue , 2010 .

[20]  Eren Özceylan,et al.  Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: A GIS-based fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis , 2018, Energy.

[21]  Matti Supponen.  Factors that Influence the Targets and Criteria for Electricity Interconnector Investments , 2012 .

[22]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Technical benefits of energy storage and electricity interconnections in future British power systems , 2014 .

[23]  M. Raddant.  The response of European stock markets to the Brexit , 2016 .

[24]  M. Pollitt.  The economic consequences of Brexit: energy , 2017 .

[25]  Klaus Gugler,et al.  Integration of European Electricity Markets: Evidence from Spot Prices , 2018, The Energy Journal.

[26]  J. Bergh,et al.  Optimal diversity of renewable energy alternatives under multiple criteria: An application to the UK , 2016 .

[27]  Inga Boie,et al.  Efficient strategies for the integration of renewable energy into future energy infrastructures in Europe – An analysis based on transnational modeling and case studies for nine European regions , 2014 .

[28]  Dogan Keles,et al.  How to benefit from a common European electricity market design , 2017 .

[29]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[30]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  Climate change policy after Brexit , 2017 .

[31]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services , 2016 .

[32]  Dietmar Lindenberger,et al.  The role of grid extensions in a cost-efficient transformation of the European electricity system until 2050 , 2013 .

[33]  M. Ebell,et al.  The long-term economic impact of leaving the EU , 2016, National Institute Economic Review.

[34]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension , 2013 .

[35]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Optimal interconnection and renewable targets for north-west Europe , 2012 .

[36]  Matthew Lockwood,et al.  Ideas, institutions and interests in the politics of cross-border electricity interconnection: Greenlink, Britain and Ireland , 2017 .

[37]  Stephen C. Theophilus,et al.  Brexit and UK Energy Security: Perspectives from Unconventional Gas Investment and the Effects of Shale Gas on UK Energy Prices , 2019 .

[38]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization &Integration* , 2005 .

[39]  Maria Madalena Teixeira de Araújo,et al.  Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool: The Portuguese case , 2013 .

[40]  Lisa Scholten,et al.  Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning , 2017, PloS one.

[41]  Danae Diakoulaki,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece , 2007 .

[42]  András Mezősi,et al.  Assessment of the EU 10% interconnection target in the context of CO2 mitigation† , 2016 .

[43]  E. Barbour,et al.  An analysis of storage revenues from the time-shifting of electrical energy in Germany and Great Britain from 2010 to 2016 , 2018, Journal of Energy Storage.

[44]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  D. Helm.  The European framework for energy and climate policies , 2014 .

[46]  Jian Wang,et al.  Optimal Operation of Interprovincial Hydropower System Including Xiluodu and Local Plants in Multiple Recipient Regions , 2019, Energies.

[47]  D. Hirst,et al.  Carbon Price Floor (CPF) and the price support mechanism , 2018 .

[48]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India , 2012 .

[49]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland , 2017 .

[50]  Valentin Bertsch,et al.  Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Paolo Vanin.  The Economic Consequences of Brexit , 2019, Brexiternity.

[52]  Swati Dhingra,et al.  A hitch-hiker’s guide to post-Brexit trade negotiations: options and principles , 2017 .

[53]  Dirk T. G. Rübbelke,et al.  Germany’s “No” to carbon capture and storage: Just a question of lacking acceptance? , 2018 .

[54]  Michael Grubb,et al.  UK Electricity Market Reform and the Energy Transition: Emerging Lessons , 2018, The Energy Journal.

[55]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  The direct interconnection of the UK and Nordic power market – Impact on social welfare and renewable energy integration , 2018, Energy.

[56]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Renewable Electric Energy Integration: Quantifying the Value of Design of Markets for International Transmission Capacity , 2011 .

[57]  Jacques Pelkmans,et al.  Interconnector Investment for a Well-Functioning Internal Market: What EU regime of regulatory incentives? Bruges European Economic Research (BEER) Papers 18/October 2010 , 2010 .

[58]  Athanasios Kolios,et al.  A Framework for the Selection of Optimum Offshore Wind Farm Locations for Deployment , 2018, Energies.

[59]  Serkan Yavuz,et al.  Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[60]  L. Ryan,et al.  Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies , 2011 .

[61]  Winston W. Chang.  Brexit and its Economic Consequences , 2018, The World Economy.

[62]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[63]  Tomas Maltby,et al.  European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism , 2013, Energy policy.