How e-Government managers prioritise rival value positions: The efficiency imperative

E-Government strategies, investments, project selection, and implementations are influenced by value positionsdeeply enshrined in the traditions of public administration, which are in turn reflected in the everyday discourse of publicmanagers. We analyse value traditions in the public administration literature and their adaptation for e-Government and synthesise three prominent positions. Administrative efficiency focuses on cost-effectiveness logics highlighted by New Public Management thinking. Service improvement, derived from the tradition of public service, emphasises the provision of better services for citizens. Citizen engagement, with its roots in liberal democracy arguments, promotes responsiveness, consultation, collaboration and participation. A set of foundational values grounded in the deeply rooted bureaucratic tradition is also distinguished. A qualitative survey of Danish local authority managers’ value positions shows a heavy bias towards administrative efficiency and an absence of concern for citizen engagement. The implications of this efficiency imperative are discussed.

[1]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[2]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  South Korean Public Officials' Perceptions of Values, Failure, and Consequences of Failure in E-Government Leadership , 2003 .

[3]  A. Sikula,et al.  The Values and Value Systems of Governmental Executives , 1973 .

[4]  H. Jansen,et al.  The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods , 2010 .

[5]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering , 2000 .

[7]  W. R. DUNLOP,et al.  The Profession of Management , 1935, Nature.

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  E. Ferlie,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Public Management , 2007 .

[10]  H. William Vroman,et al.  Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , 1994 .

[11]  Frank Bannister,et al.  ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  J. Patrick Dobel,et al.  Public Management as Ethics , 2007 .

[13]  M. Traynor Focus group research. , 2015, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[14]  Jianwei Liu,et al.  eGovernment Project Evaluation: An Integrated Framework , 2008, EGOV.

[15]  Z. Wal,et al.  Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? The Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values , 2009 .

[16]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  E-government value priorities of Danish local authority managers , 2012 .

[17]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Public Sector Reforms and the Notion of 'Public Value': Implications for eGovernment Deployment , 2009, AMCIS.

[18]  M. Rutgers,et al.  Sorting Out Public Values? On the Contingency of Value Classification in Public Administration , 2008 .

[19]  Ulrik Kjaer,et al.  Municipal Amalgamations and the Democratic Functioning of Local Councils: The Case of The Danish 2007 Structural Reform , 2010 .

[20]  M. Moore,et al.  PUBLIC VALUE AS THE FOCUS OF STRATEGY , 1994 .

[21]  John Dewey,et al.  Theory of valuation , 1939 .

[22]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[23]  Rhoda C. Joseph,et al.  A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Michael L. Best,et al.  Impact and Sustainability of E-Government Services in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from Tamil Nadu, India , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[25]  Joan C. Steyaert Measuring the performance of electronic government services , 2004 .

[26]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[27]  Michael Grimsley,et al.  Attaining social value from electronic government , 2008 .

[28]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[29]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  G. Garson,et al.  Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State , 2008 .

[31]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information infrastructure, governance, and socio-economic development in developing countries , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Designing Deliberation Systems , 2010, Inf. Soc..

[34]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Escalation and de‐escalation of commitment: a commitment transformation analysis of an e‐government project , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[35]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  The New Public Governance? 1 , 2006 .

[36]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  eParticipation: Designing and Managing Political Discussion Forums , 2010 .

[37]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[38]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[39]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Government Value Paradigms - Bureaucracy, New Public Management, and E-Government , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded Theory in Practice , 1997 .

[41]  Sanjay K. Pandey Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State , 2008 .

[42]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration , 1991 .

[43]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[44]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[45]  M. Moore Creating public value : strategic management in government , 1995 .

[46]  Trudi C. Miller The Operation of Democratic Institutions , 1989 .

[47]  Michael Grimsley,et al.  e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  M. Rutgers,et al.  Public Values , 2015 .

[49]  R. Moe,et al.  THE REINVENTING GOVERNMENT EXERCISE: MISINTERPRETING THE PROBLEM, MISJUDGING THE CONSEQUENCES , 1994 .

[50]  Linda Deleon,et al.  The Political Theory of Reinvention , 2000 .

[51]  David Osborne,et al.  Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government , 1997 .

[52]  Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk,et al.  The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  M. Prowle The Changing Public Sector , 2000 .

[54]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  M. Zairi,et al.  Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation , 2006, 2006 Innovations in Information Technology.

[56]  Chien-Chih Yu A value-based strategic management process for e-government strategy planning and performance control , 2007, ICEGOV.

[57]  Paul Foley,et al.  The Real Benefits, Beneficiaries and Value of E-Government , 2005 .

[58]  Alina M. Chircu E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[59]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic.@@@Bureaucratic Power in Society. , 1985 .

[60]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Dangerous Enthusiasms: E-government, Computer Failure and Information System Development , 2006 .

[61]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Montgomery Van Wart,et al.  Changing Public Sector Values , 1998 .

[63]  Benoît Otjacques,et al.  Interoperability of E-Government Information Systems: Issues of Identification and Data Sharing , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Thomas A. Schwandt Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. , 1994 .

[65]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration , 1996 .

[66]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Computer analysis and qualitative research , 1998 .

[67]  William Golden,et al.  Understanding Net Benefits: A Citizen-Based Perspective on eGovernment Success , 2009, ICIS.

[68]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[69]  Mahadeo Jaiswal,et al.  A conceptual framework for measuring public value of enterprise applications , 2009, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..