Stepwise Gatekeeping Procedures in Clinical Trial Applications

This paper discusses multiple testing problems in which families of null hypotheses are tested in a sequential manner and each family serves as a gatekeeper for the subsequent families. Gatekeeping testing strategies of this type arise frequently in clinical trials with multiple objectives, e.g., multiple endpoints and/or multiple dose-control comparisons. It is demonstrated in this paper that the parallel gatekeeping procedure of Dmitrienko, Offen and Westfall (2003) admits a simple stepwise representation (n null hypotheses can be tested in n steps rather than 2n steps required in the closed procedure). The stepwise representation considerably simplifies the implementation of gatekeeping procedures in practice and provides an important insight into the nature of gatekeeping inferences. The derived stepwise gatekeeping procedure is illustrated using clinical trial examples.

[1]  A. Dmitrienko,et al.  Gatekeeping procedures in dose–response clinical trials based on the Dunnett test , 2006, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[2]  Xun Chen,et al.  The application of enhanced parallel gatekeeping strategies , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  Analysis of Clinical Trials Using SAS: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[4]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  A Sequential procedure for studies comparing multiple doses , 2002 .

[5]  Hui Quan,et al.  Decision rule based multiplicity adjustment strategy , 2005, Clinical trials.

[6]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[7]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[8]  L. Hothorn,et al.  Testing strategies in multi-dose experiments including active control. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Dmitri V Zaykin,et al.  Multiple tests for genetic effects in association studies. , 2002, Methods in molecular biology.

[10]  Roger L. Berger,et al.  Multiparameter Hypothesis Testing and Acceptance Sampling , 1982 .

[11]  P. Westfall,et al.  Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Westfall,et al.  Optimally weighted, fixed sequence and gatekeeper multiple testing procedures , 2001 .

[13]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Analysis of clinical trial data using SAS: A practical guide , 2005 .

[14]  Yosef Hochberg,et al.  Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut , 1999 .

[15]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[16]  Mikhail Nikulin,et al.  Statistical planning and inference in accelerated life testing using the CHSS model , 2004 .