Depolarization of diffusely reflecting man-made objects.

The polarization properties of light scattered or diffusely reflected from seven different man-made samples are studied. For each diffusely reflecting sample an in-plane Mueller matrix bidirectional reflectance distribution function is measured at a fixed bistatic angle using a Mueller matrix imaging polarimeter. The measured profile of depolarization index with changing scattering geometry for most samples is well approximated by an inverted Gaussian function. Depolarization is minimum for specular reflection and increases asymptotically in a Gaussian fashion as the angles of incidence and scatter increase. Parameters of the Gaussian profiles fitted to the depolarization data are used to compare samples. The dependence of depolarization on the incident polarization state is compared for each Stokes basis vector: horizontal, vertical, 45 degrees, 135 degrees, and right- and left-circular polarized light. Linear states exhibit similar depolarization profiles that typically differ in value by less than 0.06 (where 1.0 indicates complete depolarization). Circular polarization states are depolarized more than linear states for all samples tested, with the output degree of polarization reduced from that of linear states by as much as 0.15. The depolarization difference between linear and circular states varies significantly between samples.

[1]  Eusebio Bernabeu,et al.  Depolarization and polarization indices of an optical system , 1986 .

[2]  H. V. Hulst Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[3]  E. Marx,et al.  Ray model of light scattering by flake pigments or rough surfaces with smooth transparent coatings. , 2004, Applied optics.

[4]  Russell A. Chipman,et al.  Mueller matrix scatter polarimetry of a diamond-turned mirror , 1995 .

[5]  R. Chipman Depolarization index and the average degree of polarization. , 2005, Applied optics.

[6]  Tsu-Wei Nee,et al.  Principal Mueller matrix of reflection and scattering measured for a one-dimensional rough surface , 2002 .

[7]  Tsu-Wei Nee,et al.  Polarization of scattering by rough surfaces , 1998, Optics & Photonics.

[8]  R. Chipman,et al.  Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition , 1996 .

[9]  Thomas A. Germer,et al.  Modeling the appearance of special effect pigment coatings , 2001, Optics + Photonics.

[10]  Michael E. Knotts,et al.  Stokes matrix of a one-dimensional perfectly conducting rough surface , 1992 .

[11]  E. Bernabeu,et al.  A Depolarization Criterion in Mueller Matrices , 1985 .

[12]  Michael E. Knotts,et al.  Polarization dependence of scattering from one-dimensional rough surfaces , 1991 .

[13]  M. W. Williams,et al.  Depolarization and cross polarization in ellipsometry of rough surfaces. , 1986, Applied optics.

[14]  A. G. Navarrete,et al.  Statistics of the polarization properties of one-dimensional randomly rough surfaces , 1995 .

[15]  J. Hovenier,et al.  Depolarization of light backscattered by randomly oriented nonspherical particles. , 1995, Optics letters.

[16]  Brian G. Hoover,et al.  Active detection of off-diagonal Mueller elements of rough targets , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[17]  E Jakeman,et al.  Backscatter linear and circular polarization analysis of roughened aluminum. , 1998, Applied optics.

[18]  K. H. Jun,et al.  Simulation of depolarization effect by a rough surface for spectroscopic ellipsometry. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Matthew H. Smith,et al.  Optimization of a dual-rotating-retarder Mueller matrix polarimeter. , 2002, Applied optics.

[20]  G. Videen,et al.  Polarized light scattered from rough surfaces , 1992 .

[21]  Tod F. Schiff,et al.  Mueller matrix measurements of scattered light , 1993, Optics & Photonics.