Incremental Validity of Situational Judgment Tests for Task and Contextual Job Performance

This paper has three goals. First, it responds to calls for additional research on subgroup differences in situational judgment tests. Second, it expands the cumulative knowledge on the incremental validity of situational judgment tests beyond cognitive ability and personality. Third, it examines the validity and incremental validity of various predictors for both task and contextual performance.

[1]  Nathan S. Hartman,et al.  Situational Judgment Tests: Validity and an Integrative Model. , 2006 .

[2]  C. Spearman,et al.  "THE ABILITIES OF MAN". , 1928, Science.

[3]  Philip Bobko,et al.  TESTING FOR FAIRNESS WITH A MODERATED MULTIPLE REGRESSION STRATEGY: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS , 1978 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  T. Cleary TEST BIAS: PREDICTION OF GRADES OF NEGRO AND WHITE STUDENTS IN INTEGRATED COLLEGES , 1968 .

[6]  Matthew S. O’Connell,et al.  Practical Limitations in Making Decisions Regarding the Distribution of Applicant Personality Test Scores Based on Incumbent Data , 2007 .

[7]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The g-ocentric View of Intelligence and Job Performance Is Wrong , 1993 .

[8]  Matthew S. O'Connell,et al.  Prediction of Mulitdimensional Criteria: Distinguishing Task and contextual Performance , 1998 .

[9]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. , 1990 .

[10]  Matthew S. O’Connell,et al.  Incremental Validity of Locus of Control After Controlling for Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness , 2005 .

[11]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness , 1971 .

[13]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Michael A. McDaniel The evaluation of a causal model of job performance : the interrelationships of general mental ability, job experience and job performance , 1986 .

[15]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[16]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Effects of Response Instructions on Faking a Situational Judgment Test , 2005 .

[17]  H. G. Osburn,et al.  Moderating effects of decision-making/information-processing job dimensions on test validities. , 1983 .

[18]  Jeff A. Weekley,et al.  Video-based situational testing. , 1997 .

[19]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Incremental validity of situational judgment tests , 2001 .

[20]  James R. Van Scotter,et al.  Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. , 1996 .

[21]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Practice and Constructs Assessed , 2001 .

[22]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings , 1996 .

[24]  N. Schmitt,et al.  An Evaluation of Two Strategies for Reducing Adverse Impact and Their Effects on Criterion-Related Validity , 1996 .

[25]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Situational Judgment and Job Performance , 2002 .

[26]  W. Borman,et al.  A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .

[27]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Nancy Tippins,et al.  Further studies of the low‐fidelity simulation in the form of a situational inventory , 1993 .

[29]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  A reexamination of black-white mean differences in work performance: more data, more moderators. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Jeff A. Weekley,et al.  FURTHER STUDIES OF SITUATIONAL TESTS , 1999 .