Swearing Effects on Citizen-to-Citizen Commenting Online

Swearing, the use of taboo languages tagged with a high level of emotional arousal, has become commonplace in contemporary political culture. The current study attempts to understand the ways in which swearing influences citizen-to-citizen news commenting online. Based on a large corpus of the 2-month user comments from 26 news websites in South Korea, the study examines swearing effects as well as its interplay with anonymity on garnering public attention and shaping other users’ perceptions of the comments. Findings suggest that swearing generally has a positive effect on increasing user attention to comments as well as gaining other users’ approvals. Comparisons between political and nonpolitical topics further suggest that swearing effect on gaining public attention is particularly prominent for political discussions. In contrast, the magnitude of change toward positive valence in public perception to comments is much greater for nonpolitical topics than for politics. From the findings, we conclude that an acceptable degree of swearing norms in online discussions vary across news topical arenas. The results also lead to discussions about the possibility of like-minded exposure to political comments as a default condition for online discussions. Finally, the study highlights the role of high-arousal emotions in shaping discursive participation in contemporary networked sociodigital environment.

[1]  Luke Goode,et al.  Social news, citizen journalism and democracy , 2009, New Media Soc..

[2]  Maria de Fatima Oliveira,et al.  Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt , 2012 .

[3]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Government Monitoring and Political Participation in the United States: The Distinct Roles of Anger and Anxiety , 2011 .

[4]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment , 2000 .

[5]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[6]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[7]  E. Diener Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. , 1979 .

[8]  J. Burgoon Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication , 1993 .

[9]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[10]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective , 2011 .

[11]  Diana C. Mutz Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[12]  Zizi Papacharissi Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics , 2014 .

[13]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Chang Woo-young Online civic participation, and political empowerment: online media and public opinion formation in Korea , 2005 .

[16]  Jennifer Wolak,et al.  Personality and Emotional Response: Strategic and Tactical Responses to Changing Political Circumstances , 2007 .

[17]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Fk yea I swear: cursing and gender in MySpace , 2008 .

[18]  A AndersonAshley,et al.  The "Nasty Effect , 2014 .

[19]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments , 2014 .

[20]  Yonghwan Kim,et al.  The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  K. Kwon,et al.  Wireless Protesters Move Around: Informational and Coordinative Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Protest Politics , 2011 .

[22]  K. Hazel Kwon,et al.  The impacts of identity verification and disclosure of social cues on flaming in online user comments , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Tzu-Yuan Chao,et al.  To reveal or not to reveal , 2017 .

[24]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[25]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Understanding Deliberation , 1999 .

[26]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Searching for Safety Online: Managing "Trolling" in a Feminist Forum , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[27]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[28]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits , 2013 .

[29]  Timothy B. Jay The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[30]  S. Feldman,et al.  9. On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger , 2019 .

[31]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation , 2009 .

[32]  Nicoletta Cavazza,et al.  Swearing in Political Discourse , 2014 .

[33]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[34]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Empirical analysis of online anonymity and user behaviors: the impact of real name policy , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Rob Kling,et al.  Assessing Anonymous Communication on the Internet: Policy Deliberations , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[36]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda‐Setting Theory Meets Big Data , 2014 .

[37]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Jennifer Brundidge Encountering "Difference" in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks , 2010 .

[39]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Ria Verleur,et al.  Flaming on YouTube , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  John Sabini,et al.  The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes toward punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies , 2000 .

[42]  A ValentinoNicholas,et al.  Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation , 2011 .

[43]  Sarah M. Coyne,et al.  Profanity in Media Associated With Attitudes and Behavior Regarding Profanity Use and Aggression , 2011, Pediatrics.

[44]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Exploring the Role of Political Discussion for Online Political Participation , 2012 .

[45]  Jonah A. Berger Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information , 2011, Psychological science.

[46]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[47]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[48]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[49]  Timothy Jay,et al.  Memories of Punishment for Cursing , 2006 .

[50]  J. Geer,et al.  Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate , 2007 .

[51]  Peter Bro Gatekeeping Theory , 2019, The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies.

[52]  E. Mabry Dimensions of Profanity , 1974 .

[53]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Audience Gatekeeping in the Twitter Service: An Investigation of Tweets about the 2009 Gaza Conflict , 2012 .

[54]  Anthony McEnery,et al.  Swearing in Modern British English: The Case of Fuck in the BNC , 2004 .

[55]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[57]  S. Chambers,et al.  DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRATIC THEORY , 2003 .