Salvage HDR Brachytherapy: Multiple Hypothesis Testing Versus Machine Learning Analysis.

PURPOSE Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (sHDRB) is a treatment option for recurrences after prior radiation therapy. However, only approximately 50% of patients benefit, with the majority of second recurrences after salvage brachytherapy occurring distantly. Therefore, identification of characteristics that can help select patients who may benefit most from sHDRB is critical. Machine learning may be used to identify characteristics that predict outcome following sHDRB. We aimed to use machine learning to identify patient characteristics associated with biochemical failure (BF) following prostate sHDRB. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed data for 52 patients treated with sHDRB for locally recurrent prostate cancer after previous definitive radiation therapy between 1998 and 2009. Following pathologic confirmation of locally recurrent disease without evidence of metastatic disease, 36 Gy in 6 fractions was administered to the prostate and seminal vesicles. BF following sHDRB was defined using the Phoenix definition. Sixteen different clinical risk features were collected, and machine learning analysis was executed to identify subpopulations at higher risk of BF. Decision tree-based algorithms including classification and regression trees, MediBoost, and random forests were constructed. RESULTS Patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years after sHDRB. Those with a fraction of positive cores ≥0.35 and a disease-free interval <4.12 years after their initial radiation treatment experienced a higher failure rate after sHDRB of 0.75 versus 0.38 for the rest of the population. CONCLUSIONS Using machine learning, we have identified that patients with a fraction of positive cores ≥0.35 and a disease-free interval <4.1 years might be associated with a high risk of BF following sHDRB.

[1]  Constantin F. Aliferis,et al.  Predicting dire outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  J. Cherlow,et al.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[3]  Lyle Ungar,et al.  Using machine learning to predict radiation pneumonitis in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Gilmer Valdes,et al.  Clinical decision support of radiotherapy treatment planning: A data-driven machine learning strategy for patient-specific dosimetric decision making. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[6]  J. Flickinger,et al.  Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  I. Hsu,et al.  Salvage HDR brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after previous definitive radiation therapy: 5-year outcomes. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Feasibility of high-dose-rate brachytherapy salvage for local prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: the University of California-San Francisco experience. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Deasy,et al.  Datamining approaches for modeling tumor control probability , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[10]  Paul Schellhammer,et al.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Use of TrueBeam developer mode for imaging QA. , 2015 .

[12]  Timothy D. Solberg,et al.  IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi‐institutional validation , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[13]  P. Lambin,et al.  Learning methods in radiation oncology ‘Rapid Learning health care in oncology’ – An approach towards decision support systems enabling customised radiotherapy’ q , 2013 .

[14]  I. Hsu,et al.  Combined modality treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced prostate cancer. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[15]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  The reusable holdout: Preserving validity in adaptive data analysis , 2015, Science.

[16]  N. Lazar,et al.  The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose , 2016 .

[17]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[18]  T D Solberg,et al.  A mathematical framework for virtual IMRT QA using machine learning. , 2016, Medical physics.

[19]  Johannes Gehrke,et al.  Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-day Readmission , 2015, KDD.

[20]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[21]  Constantin F. Aliferis,et al.  An evaluation of machine-learning methods for predicting pneumonia mortality , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[22]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[23]  L. Ungar,et al.  MediBoost: a Patient Stratification Tool for Interpretable Decision Making in the Era of Precision Medicine , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Support vector machine-based prediction of local tumor control after stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.