Classification: Purposes, Principles, Progress, Prospects

There is an intimate interrelation between principles and procedures in classification, and modern work in this field has been profoundly affected by the development of electronic computers. Besides the delineation of natural systems and the achievement of economy of memory and ease of manipulation, the primary purpose of classification is the description of the structure and relationship of groups of similar objects. Successful classifications generate scientific hypotheses, although much classificatory work has applied, practical goals. The acceptance of polythetic taxa is a major conceptual advance and has directly led to classifications based on many, equally weighted characteristics. The specification of data for classification by computer will enhance objectivity but not eliminate cultural and subjective biases. Techniques of classification include cluster analysis and ordination, and numerous ways of representing classifications have been elaborated recently. By the application of graph theory to some classificatory problems it has been possible to reconstruct evolutionary branching sequences. Computer classification has been successfully applied across a broad range of disciplines.

[1]  L. Stark,et al.  Scanpaths in Eye Movements during Pattern Perception , 1971, Science.

[2]  Jerrold Rubin,et al.  An Approach to Organizing Data into Homogeneous Groups , 1966 .

[3]  E. Paykel,et al.  Classification of Depressed Patients: A Cluster Analysis Derived Grouping , 1971, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  Robert L. Weber,et al.  The scientist speculates , 1962 .

[5]  JOHAN T. RUUD,et al.  Vertebrates without Erythrocytes and Blood Pigment , 1954, Nature.

[6]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  The Origins of Taxonomy , 1971, Science.

[7]  J. Kruskal.  Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[8]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Ordination and classification of communities , 1973 .

[9]  R. M. Cormack,et al.  A Review of Classification , 1971 .

[10]  D. H. Colless,et al.  The Phylogenetic Fallacy , 1967 .

[11]  A. E. Mourant,et al.  The Assessment of Population Affinities in Man , 1973 .

[12]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  The Two Taxonomies: Areas of Agreement and Conflict , 1965 .

[13]  G. G. Pohlman.  Soil Science Society of America Proceedings , 1948, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[14]  R. Almond.  The therapeutic community. , 1971, Scientific American.

[15]  Gareth Nelson,et al.  “Cladism” as a Philosophy of Classification , 1971 .

[16]  W. W. Moss,et al.  Taxonomic Repeatability: An Experimental Approach , 1971 .

[17]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  Folk Taxonomies and Biological Classification , 1966, Science.

[18]  R. Engle,et al.  MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: PRESENT, PAST, AND FUTURE. III. DIAGNOSIS IN THE FUTURE, INCLUDING A CRITIQUE ON THE USE OF ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS AS DIAGNOSTIC AIDS TO THE PHYSICIAN. , 1963, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  R. Colwell,et al.  Numerical taxonomy of the flexibacteria. , 1969, Journal of general microbiology.

[20]  R. Crawford,et al.  A Rapid Multivariate Method for the Detection and Classification of Groups of Ecologically Related Species , 1967 .

[21]  W. B. Kendrick,et al.  COMPLEXITY AND DEPENDENCE IN COMPUTER TAXONOMY , 1965 .

[22]  J. Gilmour,et al.  The Development of Taxonomic Theory Since 1851 , 1951, Nature.

[23]  G. Schnell,et al.  A phenetic study of the suborder Lari (Aves). II. Phenograms, discussion, and conclusions. , 1970, Systematic zoology.

[24]  K H L KEY,et al.  A Critique on the Phase Theory of Locusts , 1950, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  J. Kruskal.  Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[26]  R T Manning,et al.  Signs, symptoms, and systematics. , 1966, JAMA.

[27]  G. P. Holland.  Evolution, Classification, and Host Relationships of Siphonaptera , 1964 .

[28]  Allan C. Wilson,et al.  Albumin Differences Among Ranid Frogs: Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Implications , 1973 .

[29]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[30]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.

[31]  N. Jardine,et al.  Patterns of differentiation between human local populations. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  J. Farris.  Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[33]  D. Rosenhan.  On Being Sane in Insane Places , 1973, Science.

[34]  N. West,et al.  Matrix Cluster Analysis of Montane Forest Vegetation of the Oregon Cascades , 1966 .

[35]  G J Nelson,et al.  Outline of a theory of comparative biology. , 1970, Systematic zoology.

[36]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant Communities. , 1960 .