Effect of Microbubble Ligation to Cells on Ultrasound Signal Enhancement: Implications for Targeted Imaging

Objectives:Molecular imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) relies on the detection of microbubbles retained in regions of disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether microbubble attachment to cells influences their acoustic signal generation and stability. Materials and Methods:Biotinylated microbubbles were attached to streptavidin-coated plates to derive density versus intensity relations during low- and high-power imaging. To assess damping from microbubble attachment to solid or cell surfaces, in vitro imaging was performed for microbubbles charge-coupled to methacrylate spheres and for vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-targeted microbubbles attached to endothelial cells. Results:Signal enhancement on plates increased according to acoustic power and microbubble site density up to 300 mm−2. Microbubble signal was reduced by attachment to solid spheres during high- and low-power imaging but was minimally reduced by attachment to endothelial cells and only at low power. Conclusion:Attachment of targeted microbubbles to rigid surfaces results in damping and a reduction of their acoustic signal, which is not seen when microbubbles are attached to cells. A reliable concentration versus intensity relationship can be expected from microbubble attachment to 2-dimensional surfaces until a very high site density is reached.

[1]  D. McPherson,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound molecular imaging of atheroma components in vivo. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  A. Nadim,et al.  Radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles in viscoelastic liquids , 2002 .

[4]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging with contrast ultrasound and targeted microbubbles , 2004, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  Milton S. Plesset,et al.  Thermal Effects in the Free Oscillation of Gas Bubbles , 1971 .

[7]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Ultrasound Imaging of Inflammation Using Microbubbles Targeted to Activated Leukocytes , 2000, Circulation.

[8]  Ultrasonic analysis of peptide- And antibody-targeted microbubble contrast agents for molecular imaging of α vβ 3-expressing cells , 2004 .

[9]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[10]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Molecular and cellular imaging of atherosclerosis: emerging applications. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[12]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of inflammation by ultrasound detection of phagocytosed microbubbles. , 2000, Circulation.

[14]  Donald R Uhlmann,et al.  Behavior of bubbles in glassmelts. I - Dissolution of a stationary bubble containing a single gas , 1980 .

[15]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Optical and acoustical dynamics of microbubble contrast agents inside neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[17]  R. D. Venter,et al.  THE STABILITY OF GAS BUBBLES IN LIQUID‐GAS SOLUTIONS * , 1983 .