Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective?

Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.

[1]  H. Weidner,et al.  National Environmental Policies , 1997 .

[2]  H. Weidner.  25 years of modern environmental policy in Germany: Treading a well-worn path to the top of the international field , 1995 .

[3]  H. Folmer,et al.  Income and environmental R&D: empirical evidence from OECD countries , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[4]  David Wheeler,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  K. Anderson,et al.  The Greening of World Trade Issues , 1994 .

[6]  L. Chappell.  Federalism and Social Policy: The Case of Domestic Violence , 2001 .

[7]  The Green Myth-Economic Growth and the Quality of the Environment , 2004 .

[8]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[9]  R. Lucas.  Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution : 1960-88 , 1992 .

[10]  N. Williams.  The population bomb , 2008, Current Biology.

[11]  Herbert Obinger.  Federalism, Direct Democracy, and Welfare State Development in Switzerland , 1998, Journal of Public Policy.

[12]  J. Lekakis.  Environment and Development in a Southern European Country: Which Environmental Kuznets Curves? , 2000 .

[13]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[14]  L. Scruggs.  Sustaining Abundance: Environmental Performance in Industrial Democracies , 2003 .

[15]  James B. Reston.  Votes and Vetoes , 1946 .

[16]  Markus M. L. Crepaz.  Explaining national variations of air pollution levels: Political institutions and their impact on environmental policy‐making , 1995 .

[17]  A. Ágh.  Early consolidation and performance crisis: The Majoritarian‐consensus democracy debate in hungary , 2001 .

[18]  J. Grinevald.  The Greening of Europe , 1991 .

[19]  P. Daniels.  Technology revolutions and social development: Prospects for a green technoeconomic paradigm in lower income countries , 2005 .

[20]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[21]  P. Pierson.  Fragmented Welfare States: Federal Institutions and the Development of Social Policy , 1995 .

[22]  Pnuma,et al.  World resources 1998-99: A guide to the global environment , 1990 .

[23]  Arend Lijphart.  Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[24]  D. Skidmore,et al.  International Political Economy: The Struggle for Power and Wealth , 1993 .

[25]  J. Spiegel,et al.  Applying an Ecosystem Approach to the Determinants of Health in Centro Habana , 1999 .

[26]  M. Giampietro,et al.  An Optimum Population for North and Latin America , 1998 .

[27]  W. Riker.  Federalism: origin, operation, significance , 1964 .

[28]  Glyn Davis,et al.  Public Policy in Australia , 1988 .

[29]  L. Scruggs.  Is There Really a Link Between Neo-Corporatism and Environmental Performance? Updated Evidence and New Data for the 1980s and 1990s , 2001, British Journal of Political Science.

[30]  J. Finkelman,et al.  Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution , 1915 .

[31]  L. Lundqvist.  Do Political Structures Matter in Environmental Politics? , 1974 .

[32]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[33]  G. Powell,et al.  Elections as instruments of democracy : majoritarian and proportional visions , 2000 .

[34]  Tim Whitehouse.  International Trade and the Environment , 2006, Pace International Law Review.

[35]  R. Sugden,et al.  The Quality of Life. , 1994 .

[36]  I. Zwart.  A greener alternative? Deliberative democracy meets local government , 2003 .

[37]  Donald R. McCubbin,et al.  The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US Data , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[38]  R. Rohrschneider.  Environmental Belief Systems in Western Europe , 1993 .

[39]  V. Thomas,et al.  Constitutional Impacts on Conservation - Effects of Federalism on Biodiversity Protection - , 2002 .

[40]  David M. Chamberlain.  The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Robyn Eckersley. 2004. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 347 pp. $25 paperback. , 2006 .

[41]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Changing Patterns of Population Density in the United States , 2000 .

[42]  T. Panayotou.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 2000 .

[43]  Robert V. Bartlett,et al.  Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality , 2005 .

[44]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[45]  S. Rose-Ackerman.  Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States , 1995 .

[46]  David R. Herron.  Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries . By Arend Lijphart. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984. Pp. xv + 229. $22.50, cloth; $6.95, paper.) , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Democracy without environmental parties: The Israeli experience , 2001 .

[48]  J. Lane,et al.  Political Data Handbook: OECD Countries , 1992 .

[49]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Environmental Policy and Party Divergence in Congress , 2001 .

[50]  A. L. Lowell.  Governments And Parties In Continental Europe , 1897 .

[51]  George A. Gonzalez.  Politics of Air Pollution, The: Urban Growth, Ecological Modernization, and Symbolic Inclusion , 2005 .

[52]  J. Barry,et al.  Globalisation, Ecological Modernisation and New Labour , 2004 .

[53]  P. Allmendinger,et al.  New Labour, New Planning? The Trajectory of Planning in Blair's Britain , 2000 .

[54]  A. Fisk.  World Resources 19921993: A Guide to the Global Environment , 1993 .

[55]  R. Kent Weaver,et al.  Do Institutions Matter?: Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad , 1993 .

[56]  J. Hayward.  Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe , 1986 .

[57]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  Confronting Public Sector Complexity@@@Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector , 1988 .

[58]  David Pearce.  The Green MythEconomic Growth and the Quality of the Environment , 2001 .

[59]  Jackie Smith.  The World Social Forum and the challenges of global democracy , 2004 .

[60]  Martin Jänicke,et al.  National environmental policies : a comparative study of capacity-building : with a data appendix, international profiles of change since 1970 , 1997 .

[61]  S. Wälti.  How multilevel structures affect environmental policy in industrialized countries , 2004 .

[62]  W Graham Maddox,et al.  Australian democracy: In theory and practice , 1985 .

[63]  S. D. Bruyn,et al.  Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[64]  L. Scruggs.  Institutions and Environmental Performance in Seventeen Western Democracies , 1999, British Journal of Political Science.

[65]  D. Jahn.  Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD-countries , 1998 .

[66]  D. Palazzo,et al.  Europe’s Environment: The Second Assessment, by the Environment Agency, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1998, 293 pp. , 2000 .