Towards integrated sustainability assessment for energetic use of biomass: A state of the art evaluation of assessment tools

Biomass is expected to play an increasingly significant role in the ‘greening’ of energy supply. Nevertheless, concerns are rising about the sustainability of large-scale energy crop production. Impacts must be assessed carefully before deciding whether and how this industry should be developed, and what technologies, policies and investment strategies should be pursued. There is need for a comprehensive and reliable sustainability assessment tool to evaluate the environmental, social and economic performance of biomass energy production. This paper paves the way for such a tool by analysing and comparing the performance and applicability of a selection of existing tools that are potentially useful for sustainability assessment of bioenergy systems. The selected tools are: Criteria And Indicators (C&I), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), Exergy Analysis (EA) and System Perturbation Analysis (SPA). To evaluate the tools, a framework was constructed that consists of four evaluation levels: sustainability issues, tool attributes, model structure, area of application. The tools were then evaluated using literature data and with the help of a Delphi panel of experts. Finally, a statistical analysis was performed on the resulting data matrix to detect significant differences between tools. It becomes clear that none of the selected tools is able to perform a comprehensive sustainability assessment of bioenergy systems. Every tool has its particular advantages and disadvantages, which means that trade-offs are inevitable and a balance must be found between scientific accuracy and pragmatic decision making. A good definition of the assessment objective is therefore crucial. It seems an interesting option to create a toolbox that combines procedural parts of C&I and EIA, supplemented with calculation algorithms of LCA and CBA for respectively environmental and economic sustainability indicators. Nevertheless, this would require a more comprehensive interdisciplinary approach to align the different tool characteristics and focuses.

[1]  S. Lele.  Sustainable development: A critical review , 1991 .

[2]  H. Daly.  Toward some operational principles of sustainable development , 1990 .

[3]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Impact categories for natural resources and land use : survey and analysis of existing and proposed methods in the context of environmental life cycle assessment , 1997 .

[4]  E. Wakker,et al.  Greasy palms: the social and ecological impacts of large-scale oil palm plantation development in Southeast Asia. , 2004 .

[5]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[6]  William C. Clark,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Frontmatter , 2003 .

[7]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview , 2005 .

[8]  André Faaij,et al.  Cost/benefit analysis of biomass energy supply options for rural smallholders in the semi-arid eastern part of Shinyanga Region in Tanzania , 2010 .

[9]  John C. V. Pezzey,et al.  Sustainable Development Concepts: An Economic Analysis , 1992 .

[10]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Renewables-based technology : sustainability assessment , 2006 .

[11]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy and water - the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. , 2002 .

[12]  Bart Muys,et al.  A critical evaluation of environmental assessment tools for sustainable forest management , 1998 .

[13]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?: The Case of Transportation , 2005, 1303.6654.

[14]  Sunandan Tiwari,et al.  DEVELOPING A SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING BIOENERGY PROJECTS , 2009 .

[15]  Erwin Lindeijer,et al.  Review of land use impact methodologies , 2000 .

[16]  J Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based efficiency and renewability assessment of biofuel production. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[18]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  SAFE - A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems , 2007 .

[19]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[20]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Tools for Integrated Sustainability Assessment: A two-track approach , 2006 .

[21]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[22]  Siegfried Behrendt,et al.  Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Leitbild für die Zukunft von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft , 1996 .

[23]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[24]  David Pimentel,et al.  Food Versus Biofuels: Environmental and Economic Costs , 2009 .

[25]  A. Martins,et al.  Simulation and life cycle assessment of process design alternatives for biodiesel production from waste vegetable oils , 2010 .

[26]  I. Dincer,et al.  Exergy as the confluence of energy, environment and sustainable development , 2001 .

[27]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply , 2009 .

[28]  Reinerus Louwrentius Cornelissen,et al.  Thermodynamics and sustainable development; the use of exergy analysis and the reduction of irreversibility , 1997 .

[29]  J. Rotmans.  Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[30]  Lorenzo Cotula,et al.  Fuelling exclusion ? The biofuels boom and poor people ’ s access to land , 2008 .

[31]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  H. Bossel.  Indicators for sustainable Development : theory, method, applications : a report to the Balaton Group , 1999 .

[34]  M. J. Moran,et al.  Exergy Analysis: Principles and Practice , 1994 .

[35]  Barbara Becker,et al.  Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Values, Concepts, and Methodological Approaches , 1997 .

[36]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice , 2005 .

[37]  Carles M. Gasol,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of electricity from biomass: case studies of two biocrops in Spain. , 2010 .

[38]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[39]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  On exergy and environmental impact , 1997 .

[40]  Mei Gong,et al.  On exergy and sustainable development—Part 1: Conditions and concepts , 2001 .

[41]  H Van Langenhove,et al.  Exergy analysis in the assessment of the sustainability of waste gas treatment systems. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  The life cycle emission of greenhouse gases associated with plant oils used as biofuel , 2011 .

[43]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact , 2008 .

[44]  Prem S. Bindraban,et al.  Exploratory study on the land area required for global food supply and the potential global production of bioenergy , 2003 .

[45]  B. Muys,et al.  Sustainable Forest Management Worldwide: A Comparative Assessment of Standards , 2004 .

[46]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Nord 1995:20: Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment , 1995 .

[47]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[48]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool—the case of recycling versus incineration of paper , 1998 .

[49]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[50]  J. G. Vogtländer,et al.  Characterizing the change of land-use based on flora: application for EIA and LCA , 2004 .

[51]  Svend Bram,et al.  Detailed study of the impact of co-utilization of biomass in a natural gas combined cycle power plant through perturbation analysis , 2009 .

[52]  David F. Ciambrone,et al.  Environmental life cycle analysis , 1997 .

[53]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  A Sustainability Framework for Enhancing the Long-Term Success of Lulucf Projects , 2006 .

[54]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[55]  A. Faaij,et al.  Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade , 2006 .

[56]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[57]  Peter Hardi,et al.  Assessing sustainable development : principles in practice , 1997 .

[58]  D. Meadows.  Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development , 2021, The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities.

[59]  Roydon Andrew Fraser,et al.  Exergy analysis of ecosystems: establishing a role for thermal remote sensing , 2004 .

[60]  Karl-Henrik Robèrt,et al.  Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? , 2000 .

[61]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Bioenergy and sustainable development , 2007 .

[62]  Göran Wall,et al.  On exergy and sustainable development in environmental engineering , 2010 .

[63]  Ferenc L. Toth,et al.  State of the Art and Future Challenges for Integrated Environmental Assessment , 2004 .

[64]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[65]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India , 2010 .

[66]  Arnold Janssens,et al.  An improved calculation of the exergy of natural resources for exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA). , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  U. Fritsche,et al.  The Power of Bioenergy‐Related Standards to Protect Biodiversity , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[68]  A. Faaij,et al.  From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning , 2010 .

[69]  Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen,et al.  Future bioenergy and sustainable land use , 2010 .

[70]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Similarities, Differences and Synergisms Between HERA and LCA—An Analysis at Three Levels , 2006 .

[71]  J. Zhang.  Eco-exergy as Sustainability, S.E. Jørgensen. WIT Press (2006), 208 pp., Price: £73 (Hardbound), ISBN: 1-84564-059-4 , 2006 .

[72]  Brent R. Young,et al.  AN OPEN SOURCE EXERGY CALCULATOR TOOL , 2011 .

[73]  Judith Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment , 1999 .

[74]  Stuart Ross,et al.  Use of Life Cycle Assessment in Environmental Management , 2002 .

[75]  Sven Gärtner,et al.  Rain forest for biodiesel? : Ecological effects of using palm oil as a source of energy , 2007 .

[76]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[77]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[78]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Exergies of natural resources in life-cycle assessment and other applications , 1997 .

[79]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system , 2003 .

[80]  J Villegas,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[81]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Biofuels from stumps and small roundwood - Costs and CO2 benefits , 2008 .

[82]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2007 .

[83]  F. Walter,et al.  Nachhaltigkeit: Kriterien und Indikatoren für den Energiebereich , 2001 .

[84]  Ruggero Schleicher-Tappeser,et al.  Assessing Sustainable Development - The SQM approach , 2002 .

[85]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[86]  B. Dale,et al.  Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: Bioethanol and biodiesel , 2005 .

[87]  Benno Pokorny,et al.  What do criteria and indicators assess? An analysis of five C&I sets relevant for forest management in the , 2003 .

[88]  A. Weaver,et al.  EIA and sustainable development : Key concepts and tools , 2003 .

[89]  P. Hansson,et al.  Energy- and exergy analysis of rape seed oil methyl ester (RME) production under Swedish conditions , 1999 .

[90]  N. Woudstra,et al.  Exergy analysis of hydrogen production plants based on biomass gasification , 2008 .

[91]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Application of eco-exergy for assessment of ecosystem health and development of structurally dynamic models , 2010 .

[92]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators , 2004 .

[93]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Land use impact evaluation in life cycle assessment based on ecosystem thermodynamics , 2006 .

[94]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[95]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Reconciling sustainability and growth: criteria, indicators, policies , 2004 .

[96]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Products: Volume 2: Scientific Background , 1997 .

[97]  Henri Lecouls,et al.  ISO 14043: Environmental management · life cycle assessment · life cycle interpretation , 1999 .

[98]  Svend Bram,et al.  Using biomass : A system perturbation analysis , 2009 .

[99]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[100]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective , 2012 .

[101]  Ferenc L. Toth,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment methods: Evolution and applications , 1998 .

[102]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[103]  Julia Blasch,et al.  Sustainability standards for bioenergy—A means to reduce climate change risks? , 2010 .

[104]  L. Hens,et al.  How Green Is the City?: Sustainability Assessment and the Management of Urban Environments , 2001 .

[105]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[106]  S. Ryding.  ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[107]  Louise O. Fresco,et al.  Time and spatial scales in ecological sustainability , 1992 .

[108]  Dimitri Devuyst,et al.  Linking impact assessment and sustainable development at the local level: the introduction of sustainability assessment systems , 2000 .

[109]  M. Giordano,et al.  Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy , 2008 .

[110]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[111]  Anton Friedl,et al.  Application of exergy balances for evaluation of process configurations for biological hydrogen production , 2010 .

[112]  J. Chalmers,et al.  Development of a sustainability reporting scheme for biofuels: A UK case study , 2011 .

[113]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology, tools and case studies in product development , 2000 .

[114]  James A. Fava,et al.  A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment , 1994 .

[115]  S. Asmervik,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk. An Anatomy of Ambition , 2004 .

[116]  Rene Cornelissen,et al.  Thermodynamics and sustainable development , 1997 .