Analytical Formula for the Ratio of Central to Minimum Film Thickness in a Circular EHL Contact

Prediction of minimum film thickness is often used in practice for calculation of film parameter to design machine operation in full film regime. It was reported several times that majority of prediction formulas cannot match experimental data in terms of minimum film thickness. These standard prediction formulas give almost constant ratio between central and minimum film thickness while numerical calculations show ratio which spans from 1 to more than 3 depending on M and L parameters. In this paper, an analytical formula of this ratio is presented for lubricants with various pressure–viscosity coefficients. The analytical formula is compared with optical interferometry measurements and differences are discussed. It allows better prediction, compared to standard formulas, of minimum film thickness for wide range of M and L parameters.

[1]  W. E. ten Napel,et al.  Multilevel solution of the elastohydrodynamically lubricated circular contact problem part 2: Smooth surface results , 1992 .

[2]  Martin Hartl,et al.  Influence of Contact Pressure on Central and Minimum Film Thickness Within Ultrathin Film Lubricated Contacts , 2005 .

[3]  H. P. Evans,et al.  The Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Spheres , 1981 .

[4]  M. Khonsari,et al.  On the effect of surface roughness in point-contact EHL: Formulas for film thickness and asperity load , 2015 .

[5]  G. Dalmaz,et al.  Experimental results and analytical film thickness predictions in EHD rolling point contacts , 2007 .

[6]  The determination of the pressure–viscosity coefficient of a lubricant through an accurate film thickness formula and accurate film thickness measurements. Part 2: high L values , 2011 .

[7]  van Hj Harry Leeuwen,et al.  The determination of the pressure—viscosity coefficient of a lubricant through an accurate film thickness formula and accurate film thickness measurements: , 2009 .

[8]  Miroslav Liška,et al.  Differential colorimetry: tool for evaluation of chromatic interference patterns , 1997 .

[9]  Jérôme Molimard,et al.  Thin Film Colorimetric Interferometry , 2001 .

[10]  J. F. Dunn,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of concentrated contacts. II. General case, with lubricant entrainment along either principal axis of the Hertzian contact ellipse or at some intermediate angle , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[11]  Martin Hartl,et al.  An Automatic System for Real-Time Evaluation of EHD Film Thickness and Shape Based on the Colorimetric Interferometry , 1999 .

[12]  Obtaining the pressure spike and maximum shear stress from optical interferometry data , 2013 .

[13]  C. Venner,et al.  Revisiting film thickness in slender elasto-hydrodynamically lubricated contacts , 2010 .

[14]  Martin Hartl,et al.  Experimental Study of Central and Minimum Elastohydrodynamic Film Thickness by Colorimetric Interferometry Technique , 2000 .

[15]  Martin Hartl,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of EHD Film Shape and Its Comparison With Numerical Solution , 2000 .

[16]  C. Venner.  Multilevel solution of the EHL line and point contact problems , 1991 .

[17]  P. Vergne,et al.  On the relevance of analytical film thickness EHD equations for isothermal point contacts: Qualitative or quantitative predictions? , 2016 .

[18]  S. Bair,et al.  The Pressure-Viscosity Coefficient for Newtonian EHL Film Thickness With General Piezoviscous Response , 2006 .

[19]  H. Moes,et al.  Film thickness in elastohydrodynamically lubricated elliptic contacts , 1994 .

[20]  S. Bair.  The temperature and pressure dependence of viscosity and volume for two reference liquids , 2016 .

[21]  C J Hooke,et al.  Minimum Film Thicknesses in Lubricated Point Contacts Operating in the Elastic Piezoviscous Regime , 1988 .

[22]  D. Dowson,et al.  Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts: Part III—Fully Flooded Results , 1976 .