OR rule fusion of conditionally dependent correlation filter based classifiers for improved biometric verification

In practical biometric verification applications, we expect to observe a large variability of biometric data and single classifiers may not be very accurate. In such cases, fusion of multiple classifiers may improve accuracy. Statistical dependence of classifiers has recently been shown to improve accuracy over statistically independent classifiers. In this paper, we focus on the verification application and theoretically analyze the OR fusion rule to find the favorable and unfavorable conditional dependence between classifiers. Favorably dependent correlation filter based classifiers for the OR rule are designed on the fingerprint NIST 24 plastic distortion and rotation datasets. For the plastic distortion dataset, unconstrained optimal tradeoff (UOTF) correlation filters were used because of their distortion tolerance and discrimination capability; and for the rotation dataset, optimal trade-off circular harmonic function (OTCHF) filters were used because of their tolerance to geometric rotation. On the plastic distortion dataset, three favorably dependent classifiers were designed on different distortions of the finger, each with an EER of 15.7%, 14.3%, and 9.8% respectively. The OR fusion of these three classifiers has an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 1.8% while the best single UOTF based classifier has an EER of 2.8%. On the rotation dataset, five OTCHF filter based classifiers were designed for tolerance to different rotation angle ranges of a finger with an average individual EER of 38.8%. The OR rule fusion has an EER of 14.6%; whereas the best single OTCHF filter has an EER of 27.7%. It is also shown that the best fusion rule is the OR rule for these classifiers that were designed to be favorable for the OR rule.

[1]  Mübeccel Demirekler,et al.  Plurality voting-based multiple classifier systems: statistically independent with respect to dependent classifier sets , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Conditionally Dependent Classifier Fusion Using AND Rule for Improved Biometric Verification , 2005, ICAPR.

[3]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Optimal tradeoff circular harmonic function correlation filter methods providing controlled in-plane rotation response , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Xiang Li,et al.  Feature generation based on maximum normalized acoustic likelihood for improved speech recognition , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[6]  Xin Yao,et al.  Ensemble learning via negative correlation , 1999, Neural Networks.

[7]  Kenneth W. Bauer,et al.  Quantifying the correlation effects of fused classifiers , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  Generalized optimal thresholding for biometric key generation using face images , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[9]  P. Jonathon Phillips,et al.  The NIST HumanID Evaluation Framework , 2003, AVBPA.

[10]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[11]  A Mahalanobis,et al.  Optimal trade-off synthetic discriminant function filters for arbitrary devices. , 1994, Optics letters.

[12]  Craig I. Watson,et al.  Distortion-tolerant filter for elastic-distorted fingerprint matching , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[14]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy , 2003, Machine Learning.

[15]  Subhash C. Bagui,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2005, Technometrics.

[16]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Decision Combination in Multiple Classifier Systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Iris Verification Using Correlation Filters , 2003, AVBPA.

[18]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion , 2003, Pattern Analysis & Applications.

[20]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Performance of composite correlation filters in fingerprint verification , 2004 .