Excitable human dynamics driven by extrinsic events in massive communities

Significance Online social networks have over the last decade influenced the way people interact. Data from Twitter allow for a detailed study of the activity in online massive communities. By studying the frequency by which international brands appear on Twitter and the trade of financial securities on financial markets, we find a characteristic bursty behavior of the activity levels of Twitter users and market participants. We explain the bursty behavior by a simple model of the large-scale human behavior and quantify the correlations in the activity levels. The statistical similarity of the two social systems is an indication that the complex process underlying individual decision-making might not be very different for Twitter users and participants in financial markets. Using empirical data from a social media site (Twitter) and on trading volumes of financial securities, we analyze the correlated human activity in massive social organizations. The activity, typically excited by real-world events and measured by the occurrence rate of international brand names and trading volumes, is characterized by intermittent fluctuations with bursts of high activity separated by quiescent periods. These fluctuations are broadly distributed with an inverse cubic tail and have long-range temporal correlations with a power spectrum. We describe the activity by a stochastic point process and derive the distribution of activity levels from the corresponding stochastic differential equation. The distribution and the corresponding power spectrum are fully consistent with the empirical observations.

[1]  H. Varian,et al.  Predicting the Present with Google Trends , 2009 .

[2]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[4]  R. Mantegna,et al.  Scaling behaviour in the dynamics of an economic index , 1995, Nature.

[5]  H. Stanley,et al.  Quantifying Trading Behavior in Financial Markets Using Google Trends , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[6]  R. Cont Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues , 2001 .

[7]  Rizal Setya Perdana What is Twitter , 2013 .

[8]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Twitter mood predicts the stock market , 2010, J. Comput. Sci..

[9]  A. Mandavilli Peer review: Trial by Twitter , 2011, Nature.

[10]  Fabrizio Lillo,et al.  Dynamics of the number of trades of financial securities , 1999 .

[11]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the Future with Social Media , 2010, Web Intelligence.

[12]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[13]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[14]  B Kaulakys,et al.  Point process model of 1/f noise versus a sum of Lorentzians , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  J. G. Oliveira,et al.  Human Dynamics: The Correspondence Patterns of Darwin and Einstein , 2005 .

[16]  B Kaulakys,et al.  1/f Noise from nonlinear stochastic differential equations. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  V. Plerou,et al.  A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations , 2003, Nature.

[18]  Fang Wu,et al.  Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[20]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[21]  S. Havlin,et al.  Scaling laws of human interaction activity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[23]  G. King,et al.  Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences , 2011, Science.

[24]  John Clarke,et al.  Flicker (1f) noise: Equilibrium temperature and resistance fluctuations , 1976 .

[25]  T. Musha,et al.  1/f Fluctuation of Heartbeat Period , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[27]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Human dynamics: Darwin and Einstein correspondence patterns , 2005, Nature.

[28]  R. Voss,et al.  ’’1/f noise’’ in music: Music from 1/f noise , 1978 .

[29]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[30]  A. Arenas,et al.  Community analysis in social networks , 2004 .

[31]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  “1/fα noise” is equivalent to an eigenstructure power relation , 2011 .

[32]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Universal features of correlated bursty behaviour , 2011, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Hu,et al.  1/f noise in a two-lane highway traffic model. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[34]  H. Varian,et al.  Predicting the Present with Google Trends , 2012 .

[35]  Ewan Klein,et al.  Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) , 2012 .