Safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a framework to guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in maintaining safety

Patients, clinicians and managers all want to be reassured that their healthcare organisation is safe. But there is no consensus about what we mean when we ask whether a healthcare organisation is safe or how this is achieved. In the UK, the measurement of harm, so important in the evolution of patient safety, has been neglected in favour of incident reporting. The use of softer intelligence for monitoring and anticipation of problems receives little mention in official policy. The Francis Inquiry report into patient treatment at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust set out 29 recommendations on measurement, more than on any other topic, and set the measurement of safety an absolute priority for healthcare organisations. The Berwick review found that most healthcare organisations at present have very little capacity to analyse, monitor or learn from safety and quality information. This paper summarises the findings of a more extensive report and proposes a framework which can guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in the measurement and monitoring of safety and in reviewing progress against safety objectives. The framework has been used so far to promote self-reflection at both board and clinical team level, to stimulate an organisational check or analysis in the gaps of information and to promote discussion of ‘what could we do differently’.

[1]  Suzette Woodward,et al.  Patient Safety (2nd edn) , 2011 .

[2]  J. Weissman,et al.  Comparing Patient-Reported Hospital Adverse Events with Medical Record Review: Do Patients Know Something That Hospitals Do Not? , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Bryony Dean Franklin,et al.  How reliable are clinical systems in the UK NHS? A study of seven NHS organisations , 2012, BMJ quality & safety.

[4]  M Koutantji,et al.  Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[5]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Implementing the Learning Health System: From Concept to Action , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  M. Mckee Improving the safety of patients in England , 2013, BMJ.

[7]  G. Hanna,et al.  High reliability in health care , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Patient Safety: Vincent/Patient Safety , 2010 .

[9]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Managing the unexpected , 2001 .

[10]  C. Vincent,et al.  Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. , 1998, BMJ.

[11]  C. V. Van Way Patient safety. , 2005, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[12]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Is health care getting safer? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[14]  Ruth Thorlby,et al.  High Quality Care For All , 2008 .

[15]  A. Glasper,et al.  Improving the safety of patients in England. , 2013, British journal of nursing.

[16]  Lucy A Savitz,et al.  How Intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts. , 2011, Health affairs.

[17]  C. Vincent,et al.  Hospital patients' reports of medical errors and undesirable events in their health care. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[18]  Y. Llabador,et al.  CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES , 1998 .

[19]  D. Berlowitz,et al.  Patient safety in geriatrics: a call for action. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .