A Case Study In Participatory Environmental Systems Assessment With The Use Of Multimedia Materials And Quantitative Lca

While participation in environmental decision-making is widely recognised and valued in democratic countries as beneficial, its format and scope have not always been the source of agreement. The use of environmental systems assessment (ESA) offers the opportunity for structuring knowledge and decision-making systematically and appropriately to decision makers' concerns, to enable lay publics to participate in development of policy and implementation in public sector initiatives. In order to perform participatory ESA, effective means of involving lay people are required. This paper describes the development and testing of an innovative interactive multimedia package (WOMBLE), written for non-experts to enable them to use the expert tool WISARD, a quantitative life cycle assessment package, to enable involvement in developing and assessing options for management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). It was shown that this combination of tools can reduce the time needed to achieve effective communication, learning and active engagement.

[1]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Ragnar E. Löfstedt,et al.  Risk management in post-trust societies , 2005 .

[3]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[4]  S. Cowell,et al.  Use of Risk Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment in Decision Making: A Common Policy Research Agenda , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  The Role of Trust in the North Blackforest: An Evaluation of a Citizen Panel Project , 1999 .

[6]  R. Löfstedt.  Regulatory Negotiation: The Case of International Paper's Hydrodam Re-licensing Procedure , 2003 .

[7]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[8]  Ortwin Renn.  Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges , 1998 .

[9]  Roland Clift,et al.  Positioning and Applications of LCA , 1997 .

[10]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[11]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Siting noxious facilities: A test of the Facility Siting Credo , 1993 .

[12]  Roland Clift,et al.  The application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management - Part 1 - Methodology , 2000 .

[13]  Paul T. Williams.  Waste Treatment and Disposal , 1998 .

[14]  Judith Petts,et al.  The public—expert interface in local waste management decisions: expertise, credibility and process , 1997 .

[15]  FosterIan,et al.  Describing the Elephant , 2005 .

[16]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[17]  R. Clift,et al.  Support for Sustainable Development Policy Decisions A Case Study from Highway Maintenance , 2006 .

[18]  Derek Smith.  Adoption by industry of life cycle approaches : its implications for industry competitiveness and trade , 1998 .

[19]  Judith Petts,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: Waste Management Case-studies , 2001 .