ERP architectural/operational alignment for order‐processing performance

The selection of an appropriate enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution remains a complicated task. Since the fundamental role of an ERP solution is to support corporate operations, a key consideration is its alignment with the process requirements of the firm. This work is an investigation into the impact that this alignment has on perceived operational performance. Data are collected using a survey administered to representatives of the machine manufacturing industry. The findings suggest that the alignment of ERP solutions with operational needs is crucial to perceived ability to deliver orders on time and to general satisfaction with the ERP solution.

[1]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[2]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[3]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology , 1993 .

[4]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Electronic Surveys: Advantages and Disadvantages Over Traditional Print Surveys , 2001 .

[5]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Measurement of manufacturing flexibility: A value based approach , 1991 .

[6]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  Perceived importance of the Internet as an information channel for OM professionals , 1998 .

[7]  J. Turner,et al.  Developing Strategic Information Systems , 1984 .

[8]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The relationship of strategy, fit, productivity, and business performance in a services setting , 1999 .

[9]  M. Porter What is strategy , 2000 .

[10]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers☆ , 1995 .

[11]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  Operations Management , 2019, CCSP (ISC)2 Certified Cloud Security Professional Official Study Guide, 2nd Edition.

[12]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[14]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  Why ERP? A Primer on SAP Implementation , 2000 .

[15]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: Developments and directions for operations management research , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Roy Staughton,et al.  Towards a Simple, Visual Representation of Fit in Service Organizations: The Contribution of the Service Template , 1994 .

[17]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[18]  David K. Hardin,et al.  Increasing Precision of Market Testing , 1967 .

[19]  R. Sundarraj,et al.  Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies , 2000 .

[20]  L. Ritzman,et al.  An empirical analysis of the product-process matrix , 1996 .

[21]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Value chain resource planning: Adding value with systems beyond the enterprise , 2004 .

[22]  Henry Mintzberg Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[23]  F. David,et al.  Chase, Jacobs, and Aquilano, 2004, Operations Management for Competitive Advantage Tenth Edition, Mc Graw Hill, New York. , 2004 .

[24]  A. Lederer,et al.  An Instrument for Assessing the Organizational Benefits of IS Projects , 1998 .

[25]  D. Gerwin Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[27]  Ravi Kathuria Competitive priorities and managerial performance: a taxonomy of small manufacturers , 2000 .