Modelling the selective adaptation of Darwin’s Finches

Abstract Selection and adaptation are two fundamental processes of biological change. Change, which emanates from internal, microscopic properties, eventually leads to alterations in macroscopic patterns. There is much interest in modeling selection and adaptation using reductionistic, genetic approaches. Here, we show that a macroscopic, system-level property satisfactorily models selection. For comparison, three different approaches are employed to model the selective changes observed in a population of Darwin’s Finches. The first two models use a direct relationship between the changes of phenomenological characteristics in response to external perturbations (e.g., fluctuating weather conditions and resource availability). The third approach links adaptation to an ecosystem-level property, total system exergy, using a structurally dynamic model. Results show that although all three models capture basic system dynamics regarding the finch population, the third model most efficiently and accurately simulates system adaptation. This also illustrates that selective pressures may be tracked at the level greater than the individual.

[1]  P. Grant,et al.  Comparative Ecology of Galapagos Ground Finches (Geospiza Gould): Evaluation of the Importance of Floristic Diversity and Interspecific Competition , 1977 .

[2]  P. Grant,et al.  Darwin's Finches (Geospiza) On Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos: Breeding and Feeding Ecology in a Climatically Variable Environment , 1984 .

[3]  P. Grant,et al.  Genetic Changes in the Morphological Differentiation of Darwin’s Ground Finches , 1984 .

[4]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  A holistic approach to ecological modelling , 1979 .

[5]  Felix Müller,et al.  Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors , 1998 .

[6]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Ecosystems emerging:: 4. growth , 2000 .

[7]  P. Boag Growth and allometry of external morphology in Darwin's finches (Geospiza) on Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos , 1984 .

[8]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Synthesis of chaos and sustainability in a nonstationary linear dynamic model of the American black bear (Ursus americanus Pallas) in the Adirondack Mountains of New York , 1997 .

[9]  B. Grant,et al.  Annual variation in Finch numbers, foraging and food supply on Isla Daphne Major, Galápagos , 1980, Oecologia.

[10]  Søren Nors Nielsen,et al.  Strategies for structural-dynamic modelling , 1992 .

[11]  L. Boltzmann The Second Law of Thermodynamics , 1974 .

[12]  Richard C Lewontin,et al.  Population Biology and Evolution , 1968 .

[13]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Complementarity of ecological goal functions. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  C. Reynolds THE PLANT LIFE OF THE PELAGIC , 1996 .

[15]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Ecological buffer capacity , 1977 .

[16]  R. B. Evans,et al.  A PROOF THAT ESSERGY IS THE ONLY CONSISTENT MEASURE OF POTENTIAL WORK (FOR CHEMICAL SYSTEMS) , 1969 .

[17]  Robert W. Bosserman,et al.  Energetics and systems , 1982 .

[18]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Development of models able to account for changes in species composition , 1992 .

[19]  S. Jørgensen Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern , 1994, Ecology & Environment.

[20]  P. Grant,et al.  Intense Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches (Geospizinae) in the Gal�pagos , 1981, Science.

[21]  Thomas Petzoldt,et al.  Hybrid expert system DELAQUA ― a toolkit for water quality control of lakes and reservoirs , 1994 .

[22]  P. Grant The feeding of darwin's finches on Tribulus cistoides (L.) seeds , 1981, Animal Behaviour.