On the Importance of Morphing Deformation Scheduling for Actuation Force and Energy

Morphing aircraft offer superior properties as compared to non-morphing aircraft. They can achieve this by adapting their shape depending on the requirements of various conflicting flight conditions. These shape changes are often associated with large deformations and strains, and hence dedicated morphing concepts are developed to carry out the required changes in shape. Such intricate mechanisms are often heavy, which reduces, or even completely cancels, the performance increase of the morphing aircraft. Part of this weight penalty is determined by the required actuators and associated batteries, which are mainly driven by the required actuation force and energy. Two underexposed influences on the actuation force and energy are the flight condition at which morphing should take place and the order of the morphing manoeuvres, also called morphing scheduling. This paper aims at highlighting the importance of both influences by using a small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with different morphing mechanisms as an example. The results in this paper are generated using a morphing aircraft analysis and design code that was developed at the Delft University of Technology. The importance of the flight condition and a proper morphing schedule is demonstrated by investigating the required actuation forces for various flight conditions and morphing sequences. More importantly, the results show that there is not necessarily one optimal flight condition or morphing schedule and a tradeoff needs to be made.

[1]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Developing Response Surface Based Wing Weight Equations for Conceptual Morphing Air craft Sizing , 2005 .

[2]  Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan,et al.  Recent results from NASA's morphing project , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[3]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Enabling Continuous Optimization for Sizing Morphing Aircraft Concepts , 2005 .

[4]  M. Friswell,et al.  A review on shape memory alloys with applications to morphing aircraft , 2014 .

[5]  Roeland De Breuker,et al.  A framework for the aeroelastic analysis and design of generic morphing wings , 2015 .

[6]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[7]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Modeling and Optimization for Morphing Wing Concept Generation , 2007 .

[8]  William A. Crossley,et al.  AIRCRAFT SIZING WITH MORPHING AS AN INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: MOTIVATION, STRATEGIES AND INVESTIGATIONS , 2002 .

[9]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Morphing Wing Weight Predictors and Their Application in a Template-Based Morphing Aircraft Sizing Environment II. Part 2; Morphing Aircraft Sizing via Multi-level Optimization , 2008 .

[10]  Eric T. Martin,et al.  Multiobjective Aircraft Design to Investigate Potential Geometric Morphing Features , 2002 .

[11]  William A. Crossley,et al.  NASA / CR-2008-214903 Morphing Wing Weight Predictors and Their Application in a Template-Based Morphing Aircraft Sizing Environment II Part II : Morphing Aircraft Sizing Via Multi-Level Optimization , 2008 .

[12]  Andres F. Arrieta,et al.  Variable stiffness material and structural concepts for morphing applications , 2013 .

[13]  Yanju Liu,et al.  Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review , 2016 .

[14]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Use of Design Methods to Generate and Develop Missions for Morphing Aircraft , 2002 .

[15]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  A Generic Morphing Wing Analysis and Design Framework , 2011 .

[16]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Morphing Aircraft Technology - New Shapes for Aircraft Design , 2006 .

[17]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Comparison of Morphing Wing Strategies Based Upon Aircraft Performance Impacts , 2004 .

[18]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Morphing unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011 .

[19]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  NeoCASS+, A Conceptual Design and Simulation Framework for Morphing Aircraft , 2013 .

[20]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  The mechanics of composite corrugated structures: A review with applications in morphing aircraft , 2015 .

[21]  Luca Cavagna,et al.  NeoCASS: An integrated tool for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis and MDO at conceptual design level , 2010 .