Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators: Impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system

A transformation of the electricity generation system is required to drastically reduce the associated CO2 emissions. In future systems, variable renewable energy sources (wind and solar) are expected to provide a significant fraction of the electricity supply, increasing the requirement for variation management compared with today´s situation. This paper investigates the impacts of measures designed to increase the competitiveness of coal-fired power plants in future energy systems, which are facing restrictions related to CO2 emissions and variable operation as a consequence of high penetration levels of wind and solar power. We investigate the cost-optimal compositions of three regional electricity generation systems with different conditions for generation using renewables with a linear cost-minimizing investment model. The model is applied in two energy policy scenarios: one with a tight cap on CO2 emissions, and one with a stringent requirement for generation from renewables. In a system with a stringent requirement for electricity generation from renewables but without a CO2 cap, coal-based technologies with improved cycling properties provide variation management, given that the development of measures for ensuring improved flexibility continues and reaches full-scale implementation at moderate cost. The effects of improved cycling properties on the system composition are especially relevant for regions with moderate potential for wind and solar generation, in that they reduce wind curtailment and improve the underlying conditions for investments in solar power. In the system with a tight CO2 cap, only coal-based technologies with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and co-firing of biomass are feasible. Increasing the share of biomass in co-firing technologies to achieve negative CO2 emissions increases the competitiveness of these technologies to a greater extent than if simply the cycling properties are improved. A larger co-firing fraction reduces the total system costs, since it facilitates the provision of low-cost flexibility by Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) plants, and it is especially important in regions where nuclear power is otherwise cost-competitive, as low-cost flexibility stimulates investments in wind and solar power at the expense of nuclear power.

[1]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  A comparison of variation management strategies for wind power integration in different electricity system contexts , 2018 .

[2]  E. I. Karpenko,et al.  Plasma assisted power coal combustion in the furnace of utility boiler: Numerical modeling and full-scale test , 2014 .

[3]  M. Frondel,et al.  Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: The German experience , 2010 .

[4]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Flexibilization of steam power plants as partners for renewable energy systems , 2016, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[5]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008 , 2010 .

[6]  Karl Stéphenne,et al.  Start-up of World's First Commercial Post-combustion Coal Fired CCS Project: Contribution of Shell Cansolv to SaskPower Boundary Dam ICCS Project , 2014 .

[7]  Janet F. Barlow,et al.  Increasing thermal plant flexibility in a high renewables power system , 2015 .

[8]  C. Weber.  Uncertainty in the electric power industry , 2004 .

[9]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants , 2016 .

[10]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Linkages between demand-side management and congestion in the European electricity transmission system , 2014 .

[11]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems , 2016 .

[12]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Large scale integration of wind power: moderating thermal power plant cycling , 2011 .

[13]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Impact of thermal plant cycling on the cost-optimal composition of a regional electricity generation system , 2017 .

[14]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Effects of CO2-Absorption Control Strategies on the Dynamic Performance of a Supercritical Pulverized-Coal-Fired Power Plant , 2017 .

[15]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems , 2015 .

[16]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Benefits of coal-fired power generation with flexible CCS in a future northwest European power system with large scale wind power , 2014 .

[17]  V. E. Messerle,et al.  Modeling and full-scale tests of vortex plasma-fuel systems for igniting high-ash power plant coal , 2015 .

[18]  Iain Staffell,et al.  A systems approach to quantifying the value of power generation and energy storage technologies in future electricity networks , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[19]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Value of wind power – Implications from specific power , 2017 .

[20]  D. Lew,et al.  Impacts of wind and solar on emissions and wear and tear of fossil-fueled generators , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[21]  Håkan Runvik.  Modelling and start-up optimization of a coal-fired power plant , 2014 .

[22]  G. Jordan,et al.  Analysis of Cycling Costs in Western Wind and Solar Integration Study , 2012 .

[23]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[24]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[25]  Rosa Domenichini,et al.  Operating Flexibility of Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2013 .

[26]  Panagiotis Grammelis,et al.  Co‐firing of biomass with coal in thermal power plants: technology schemes, impacts, and future perspectives , 2014 .

[27]  J. Davison,et al.  The Role of CCS in Power Systems with High Levels of Renewables Penetration , 2013 .

[28]  Rahul Anantharaman,et al.  Integration aspects of reactive absorption for post-combustion CO2 capture from NGCC (natural gas combined cycle) power plants , 2014 .

[29]  M. Webber,et al.  Optimizing post-combustion CO2 capture in response to volatile electricity prices , 2012 .

[30]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Assessment of the value of plant flexibility in low carbon energy system , 2014 .

[31]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Whole-Systems Assessment of the Value of Energy Storage in Low-Carbon Electricity Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[32]  Xiao Wu,et al.  Fuzzy modeling and stable model predictive tracking control of large-scale power plants , 2014 .

[33]  S. Schubert,et al.  MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications , 2011 .

[34]  Kazuya Goto,et al.  A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture , 2013 .

[35]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Demonstrating load-change transient performance of a commercial-scale natural gas combined cycle power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture , 2017 .

[36]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Pathways for the North European electricity supply , 2009 .

[37]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Profitability of CCS with flue gas bypass and solvent storage , 2014 .