Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Machine learning-based computed tomography radiomics analysis for the prediction of WHO/ISUP grade.

PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML)-based computed tomography (CT) radiomics analysis for discriminating between low grade (WHO/ISUP I-II) and high grade (WHO/ISUP III-IV) clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs). METHODS A total of 164 low grade and 107 high grade ccRCCs were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Radiomic features were extracted from corticomedullary phase (CMP) and nephrographic phase (NP) CT images. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to quantify the feature's reproducibility. The training and validation cohort consisted of 163 and 108 cases. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was used for feature selection. The machine learning (ML) classifiers were k-NearestNeighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The performance of classifiers was mainly evaluated and compared by certain metrics. RESULTS Seven CMP features (ICC range, 0.990-0.999) and seven NP features (ICC range, 0.931-0.999) were selected. The accuracy of CMP, NP and the combination of CMP and NP ranged from 82.2%-85.9 %, 82.8%-94.5 % and 86.5%-90.8 % in the training cohort, and 90.7%-95.4%, 77.8%-79.6 % and 91.7%-93.5 % in the validation cohort. The AUC of CMP, NP and the combination of CMP and NP ranged from 0.901 to 0.938, 0.912 to 0.976, 0.948 to 0.968 in the training cohort, and 0.957 to 0.974, 0.856 to 0.875, 0.960 to 0.978 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS ML-based CT radiomics analysis can be used to predict the WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCCs preoperatively.

[1]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[2]  W. Shabana,et al.  Diagnosis of Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma With CT: Evaluation by Qualitative Imaging Features and Texture Analysis. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  B. Delahunt Advances and controversies in grading and staging of renal cell carcinoma , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[4]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival , 2012, European Radiology.

[5]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: validation of World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading , 2017, Histopathology.

[6]  J. Cheville,et al.  The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading System for Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Prognostic Parameters , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[7]  J. López,et al.  Gleason and Fuhrman no longer make the grade , 2016, Histopathology.

[8]  H. Yin,et al.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: CT-based radiomics features for the prediction of Fuhrman grade. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[9]  E. S. Durmaz,et al.  Radiomics of Renal Masses: Systematic Review of Reproducibility and Validation Strategies. , 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  P. Humphrey,et al.  The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. , 2016, European urology.

[11]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[12]  E. S. Durmaz,et al.  Influence of segmentation margin on machine learning–based high-dimensional quantitative CT texture analysis: a reproducibility study on renal clear cell carcinomas , 2019, European Radiology.

[13]  H. Moch,et al.  Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[14]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Radiomics and its emerging role in lung cancer research, imaging biomarkers and clinical management: State of the art. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[15]  O. Kilickesmez,et al.  Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade , 2018, European Radiology.

[16]  S. Bier,et al.  Value of computed tomography texture analysis for prediction of perioperative complications during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma , 2018, PloS one.

[17]  A. Evans,et al.  Active surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer. , 2011, European urology.

[18]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[19]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Should be Based on Nucleolar Prominence , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  Min Ju Kim,et al.  Small (<4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma: correlation between CT findings and histologic grade , 2016, Abdominal Radiology.

[21]  Jiule Ding,et al.  CT-based radiomic model predicts high grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[22]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. , 2019, European urology.

[23]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[24]  S. Fuhrman,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 1982, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[25]  Nicola Schieda,et al.  Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images? , 2015, Radiology.

[26]  M. Idrees,et al.  World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading in fine‐needle aspiration biopsies of renal masses , 2018, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[27]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016 .

[28]  E. S. Durmaz,et al.  Radiogenomics in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based High-Dimensional Quantitative CT Texture Analysis in Predicting PBRM1 Mutation Status. , 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Renal Tumour Biopsy. , 2016, European urology.

[30]  Lin Liu,et al.  Prediction of ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using support vector machine model based on CT images , 2019, Medicine.

[31]  Zhichao Feng,et al.  Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma , 2018, European Radiology.

[32]  F. Chun,et al.  Small renal masses in the elderly: Contemporary treatment approaches and comparative oncological outcomes of nonsurgical and surgical strategies , 2016, Investigative and clinical urology.

[33]  Chad A. LaGrange,et al.  Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2017, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[34]  Zhan Feng,et al.  CT texture analysis: a potential tool for predicting the Fuhrman grade of clear-cell renal carcinoma , 2019, Cancer Imaging.