Artificial anal sphincter

INTRODUCTION: Artificial anal sphincter has been proposed in severe anal incontinence when local treatment is unsuitable or has failed. The outcome after implantation of this newly developed device has not yet been determined. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients (7 men; median age, 44; standard deviation, 18; range, 14–80 years) implanted since May 1996 for a minimum of six months at three centers were prospectively evaluated. Continence (scoring system, 0 (normal) to 120 (complete incontinence)), rectal emptying, and general satisfaction were assessed clinically and at anal manometry preoperatively and postoperatively at a six-month interval. The causes of incontinence included anal trauma (9 cases), neuropathy (6 cases), neurologic disorders (4 cases), congenital malformations (3 cases), and prolapse (2 cases). Median duration of incontinence was 7.5 (standard deviation, 8) years. Stomas pre-existed in two cases and was created at implantation in one. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20 (standard deviation, 8; range, 10–35) months. Seven patients had their devices explanted, and reimplantation was successfully performed in three of these cases. At the end of follow-up, 20 (83 percent) patients had an implanted activated device. Fecal incontinence score dropped significantly from a median 106 (standard deviation, 13) preoperatively to 19 (standard deviation, 32), 25 (standard deviation, 29), and 25 (standard deviation, 25) at six months, one year, and the end of follow-up, respectively (P<0.0001). Minor and major emptying difficulties occurred in seven and two patients, respectively. A high degree of satisfaction was achieved at the end of follow-up in 18 (75 percent) of the total series. Median anal pressures at rest on manometry increased significantly from 28 (standard deviation, 17; range, 5–76) mmHg preoperatively to 60 (standard deviation, 17; range, 38–96) mmHg with a closed cuff at the end of follow-up. These pressures dropped to 30 (standard deviation, 16; range, 9–65) mmHg with an open cuff, and reocclusion time lasted a median of 4.6 minutes (standard deviation, 3 minutes; range, 38 seconds to 10 minutes). CONCLUSION: Artificial anal sphincter provided prolonged and reasonably good functional results in severe incontinence, reproducing an efficient sphincteric mechanism and allowing satisfactory anal occlusion and rectal emptying in approximately 75 percent of cases in this study. The definitive explantation rate was kept low by careful patient selection and appropriate surgical and perioperative management.

[1]  John R. Christiansen,et al.  IMPLANTATION OF ARTIFICIAL SPHINCTER FOR ANAL INCONTINENCE , 1987, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Koziol,et al.  Experiences with an artificial sphincter to establish anal continence in dogs. , 1988, The American surgeon.

[3]  M. Kamm,et al.  Recent advances in the surgical treatment of faecal incontinence , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  R. Satava,et al.  An artificial anal sphincter. Phase 2: Implantable sphincter with a perineal colostomy. , 1989, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  K. B. Kim,et al.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[6]  J Christiansen,et al.  Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter. , 1992, Annals of surgery.

[7]  C. Baeten Surgical treatment of anal incontinence , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  S. Bruley des Varannes,et al.  Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence A single institution report , 1998, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[9]  I. Finlay,et al.  Effect of a novel prosthetic anal neosphincter on human colonic blood flow , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  D. Montague The artificial urinary sphincter (AS 800): experience in 166 consecutive patients. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[11]  P. Arhan,et al.  Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. , 1978, Gastroenterology.

[12]  S Halligan,et al.  Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose- designed artifical bowel sphincter , 1998 .

[13]  Paul-Antoine Lehur,et al.  Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence , 1996, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[14]  D. M. Barrett,et al.  Success of the narrow-backed cuff design of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of 144 patients. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[15]  G. L. Engel,et al.  Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Lledó,et al.  Prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  F. B. Scott,et al.  The use of the AMS-AS800 artificial sphincter for continent urinary diversion. I. Investigations, including pressure-flow studies, using rabbit intestinal loops. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[18]  M. Kamm,et al.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems , 1999, Gut.

[19]  G. Timm,et al.  A prosthetic sphincter for the gastrointestinal tract. , 1974, The Journal of surgical research.

[20]  I. G. Finlay,et al.  Artificial anal sphincter , 1996, Diseases of the colon and rectum.