Spatially-explicit effects of seed and fertilizer intensification for maize in Tanzania

Abstract Slower than desired growth in crop yields coupled with rising food demand present ongoing challenges for food security in Africa. Some countries, such as Tanzania, have signed the Malabo and Abuja Declarations, which aim to boost food security through increasing crop productivity. The more intensive use of seed and fertilizer presents one approach to raising crop productivity. Our simulation study examined the productivity and economic effects of planting different seed cultivars and increasing fertilizer application rates at multiple spatial scales for maize in Tanzania. We combined crop simulation modelling with household data on costs and prices to examine field-scale and market-scale profitability. To scale out our analysis from the field scale to the regional and national scale (market scale) we applied an economic surplus model. Simulation results suggest that modest changes in seed cultivars and fertilizer application rates can double productivity without having a negative effect on its stability. The profitability of applying extra fertilizer, calculated as its value-cost ratio, increased if improved seed cultivars replaced local seed cultivars. Rankings of district-scale profits differed from rankings of district scale yields, highlighting the importance of considering economic factors in assessments of input intensification. At the national scale, simulation results suggest the total benefit could be US$ 697 million over 5 years if there was a 39 percent adoption rate of planting improved seed and applying extra mineral fertilizer. Providing economic assessments of input intensification helps build evidence for progressing the Malabo and Abuja Declarations.

[1]  K. Garrett,et al.  Food Security in a World of Natural Resource Scarcity: The Role of Agricultural Technologies , 2014 .

[2]  L. You,et al.  Exploring strategic priorities for regional agricultural R&D investments in East and Central Africa , 2010 .

[3]  A. Dobermann Nitrogen Use Efficiency – State of the Art , 2005 .

[4]  J. Black,et al.  Factors Influencing the Profitability of Fertilizer Use on Maize in Zambia , 2009 .

[5]  G. Norton,et al.  Peanut Research and Poverty Reduction: Impacts of Variety Improvement to Control Peanut Viruses in Uganda , 2007 .

[6]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.5 [CD-ROM] , 2012 .

[7]  L. You,et al.  Estimating the potential for expanding smallholder irrigation in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2014 .

[8]  L. You,et al.  Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania , 2008 .

[9]  T. Reardon,et al.  Incentives for Fertilizer Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Empirical Evidence on Fertilizer Response and Profitability , 1998 .

[10]  J. Thurlow,et al.  Agricultural Growth, Poverty, and Nutrition in Tanzania , 2011 .

[11]  J. Six,et al.  Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[12]  Aloyce R. Kaliba,et al.  Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Maize Seeds and Use of Inorganic Fertilizer for Maize Production in the Intermediate and Lowland Zones of Tanzania , 2000, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[13]  Drea Malabo Declaration on Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation for Shared Prosperity and Improved Livelihoods , 2014 .

[14]  Jonne Rodenburg,et al.  RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity , 2015 .

[15]  A. Ruane,et al.  Climate forcing datasets for agricultural modeling: Merged products for gap-filling and historical climate series estimation , 2015 .

[16]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[17]  C. Willmott ON THE VALIDATION OF MODELS , 1981 .

[18]  J. Foley,et al.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050 , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  J. Black,et al.  Factors explaining the low and variable profitability of fertilizer application to maize in Zambia , 2017 .

[20]  S. Snapp,et al.  Sustainable intensification options for smallholder maize-based farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa , 2017, Food Security.

[21]  J. Huising,et al.  Maize response to macronutrients and potential for profitability in sub-Saharan Africa , 2015, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[22]  O. Erenstein,et al.  Measuring Farm and Market Level Economic Impacts of Improved Maize Production Technologies in Ethiopia: Evidence from Panel Data , 2018 .

[23]  S. Tembo,et al.  What are the effects of input subsidy programs on maize prices? Evidence from Malawi and Zambia , 2013 .

[24]  A. Chapoto,et al.  Moving in the right direction? The role of price subsidies in fertilizer use and maize productivity in Ghana , 2017, Food Security.

[25]  Roy T. Black,et al.  Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for input intensification strategies and research , 2013 .

[26]  Application of DSSAT Crop Models to Generate Alternative Production Activities Under Combined Use of Organic-Inorganic Nutrients in Rwanda , 2012 .

[27]  S. Adiku,et al.  Using CERES-Maize and ENSO as Decision Support Tools to Evaluate Climate-Sensitive Farm Management Practices for Maize Production in the Northern Regions of Ghana , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[28]  B. Beattie Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting , 1995 .

[29]  K. Otsuka,et al.  Why African rural development strategies must depend on small farms , 2016 .

[30]  G. Sileshi,et al.  Maize yield response, nitrogen use efficiency and financial returns to fertilizer on smallholder farms in southern Africa , 2017, Food Security.

[31]  B. Omonona,et al.  Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria , 2017, Food policy.

[32]  S. Andelman,et al.  Regional suitability for agricultural intensification: a spatial analysis of the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania , 2016 .

[33]  S. Rashid,et al.  Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent evidence , 2013 .

[34]  Zhe Guo,et al.  Sustainable recommendation domains for scaling agricultural technologies in Tanzania , 2017 .