ImmunoPET in Multiple Myeloma—What? So What? Now What?

Despite constant progress over the past three decades, multiple myeloma (MM) is still an incurable disease, and the identification of new biomarkers to better select patients and adapt therapy is more relevant than ever. Recently, the introduction of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (including direct-targeting mAbs and immune checkpoint inhibitors) appears to have changed the paradigm of MM management, emphasizing the opportunity to cure MM patients through an immunotherapeutic approach. In this context, immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET), combining the high sensitivity and resolution of a PET camera with the specificity of a radiolabelled mAb, holds the capability to cement this new treatment paradigm for MM patients. It has the potential to non-invasively monitor the distribution of therapeutic antibodies or directly monitor biomarkers on MM cells, and to allow direct observation of potential changes over time and in response to various therapeutic interventions. Tumor response could, in the future, be anticipated more effectively to provide individualized treatment plans tailored to patients according to their unique imaging signatures. This work explores the important role played by immunotherapeutics in the management of MM, and focuses on some of the challenges for this drug class and the significant interest of companion imaging agents such as immunoPET.

[1]  Gary A Ulaner,et al.  CD38-targeted Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma: From Xenograft Models to First-in-Human Imaging. , 2020, Radiology.

[2]  Zachary T. Rosenkrans,et al.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications. , 2020, Chemical reviews.

[3]  B. Jönsson,et al.  The cost of cancer in Europe 2018. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[4]  N. Raje,et al.  Current Treatment Strategies for Multiple Myeloma. , 2020, JCO oncology practice.

[5]  J. Balthasar,et al.  Understanding Inter-Individual Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Disposition , 2019, Antibodies.

[6]  T. Paíno,et al.  Biological Background of Resistance to Current Standards of Care in Multiple Myeloma , 2019, Cells.

[7]  D. Siegel,et al.  Pembrolizumab combined with lenalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: phase I KEYNOTE‐023 study , 2019, British journal of haematology.

[8]  S. Jagannath,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with treatment-naive multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-185): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Haematology.

[9]  C. Bailly,et al.  Exploring Tumor Heterogeneity Using PET Imaging: The Big Picture , 2019, Cancers.

[10]  A. Romano,et al.  Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[11]  F. Malavasi,et al.  Editorial: Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma , 2019, Front. Immunol..

[12]  D. Siegel,et al.  Phase 1b trial of pembrolizumab monotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: KEYNOTE‐013 , 2019, British journal of haematology.

[13]  C. Costello The future of checkpoint inhibition in multiple myeloma? , 2019, The Lancet. Haematology.

[14]  Jason J. Z. Liao,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-183): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Haematology.

[15]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study , 2019, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Cardona,et al.  Challenges and shifting paradigms in clinical trials in oncology: the case for immunological and targeted therapies , 2019, Ecancermedicalscience.

[17]  D. Dingli,et al.  Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma (MM) including high-risk patients. , 2019, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  C. Bailly,et al.  What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between 89Zr- and 64Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[19]  Jason S. Lewis,et al.  Preclinical development and First-in-human imaging of 89Zr-Daratumumab for CD38 targeted imaging of myeloma , 2019 .

[20]  J. Turner,et al.  Theranostic Outcomes in Clinical Practice of Oncology: What, So What, Now What? What's More. , 2019, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[21]  N. Weinhold,et al.  The Impact of Tumor Heterogeneity on Diagnostics and Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[22]  I. Trocóniz,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , 2019, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[23]  G. V. van Dongen,et al.  Immuno-PET Imaging to Assess Target Engagement: Experience from 89Zr-Anti-HER3 mAb (GSK2849330) in Patients with Solid Tumors , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  M. Wildgruber,et al.  The beginning of the end for conventional RECIST — novel therapies require novel imaging approaches , 2019, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[25]  H. Einsele,et al.  Clinical and biological characteristics of myeloma patients influence response to elotuzumab combination therapy , 2018, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Hiroki Kobayashi,et al.  CD38 Expression Levels on Myeloma Cells and the Frequency of Circulating CD38-Positive Treg Cells Are Associated with the Response to Daratumumab in Multiple Myeloma , 2018, Blood.

[27]  J. Keats,et al.  Immune Mediated Mechanisms of Resistance to Daratumumab , 2018, Blood.

[28]  M. Boccadoro,et al.  Promises and Pitfalls in the Use of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[29]  R. Hájek,et al.  Update on PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[30]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer , 2018, Nature Communications.

[31]  R. Pazdur,et al.  Immunotherapy Combinations in Multiple Myeloma - Known Unknowns. , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and Exposure–Response Analyses of Daratumumab in Combination Therapy Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma , 2018, Advances in Therapy.

[33]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[34]  Greg M. Thurber,et al.  Tumor Drug Penetration Measurements Could Be the Neglected Piece of the Personalized Cancer Treatment Puzzle , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[35]  M. Dhodapkar,et al.  Checkpoint Inhibition in Myeloma: Opportunities and Challenges , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[36]  S. Usmani,et al.  CD38 Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms of Action and Modes of Resistance , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[37]  Yow-Ming C Wang,et al.  Individualized Dosing of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies—a Changing Treatment Paradigm? , 2018, The AAPS Journal.

[38]  Diana Romero To all involved — we have a problem , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[39]  T. Plesner,et al.  Daratumumab for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[40]  A. Gural,et al.  Daratumumab resistance is frequent in advanced‐stage multiple myeloma patients irrespective of CD38 expression and is related to dismal prognosis , 2018, European journal of haematology.

[41]  P. Lorigan,et al.  Dose Rationalization of Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab Using Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation and Cost Analysis , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[42]  Jason S. Lewis,et al.  Fc-Mediated Anomalous Biodistribution of Therapeutic Antibodies in Immunodeficient Mouse Models. , 2018, Cancer research.

[43]  E. Zamagni,et al.  Anti-CD38 and anti-SLAMF7: the future of myeloma immunotherapy , 2018, Expert review of hematology.

[44]  Zinnia P. Parra-Guillen,et al.  The Long Neglected Player: Modeling Tumor Uptake to Guide Optimal Dosing , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  Nerissa T Viola-Villegas,et al.  89 Zr-ImmunoPET companion diagnostics and their impact in clinical drug development. , 2018, Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals.

[46]  A. McCann,et al.  Overcoming multiple myeloma drug resistance in the era of cancer ‘omics’ , 2018, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[47]  Guido Marcucci,et al.  Copper 64-labeled daratumumab as a PET/CT imaging tracer for multiple myeloma. , 2018, Blood.

[48]  P. Richardson,et al.  CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma: back to the future. , 2018, Blood.

[49]  C. Bailly,et al.  Comparison of Immuno-PET of CD138 and PET imaging with 64CuCl2 and 18F-FDG in a preclinical syngeneic model of multiple myeloma , 2018, Oncotarget.

[50]  R. Day,et al.  Dealing with the spiralling price of medicines: issues and solutions , 2018, Internal medicine journal.

[51]  Andre H Crepaldi,et al.  Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  U. Mellqvist,et al.  Outcome and survival of myeloma patients diagnosed 2008–2015. Real-world data on 4904 patients from the Swedish Myeloma Registry , 2017, Haematologica.

[53]  P. Moreau,et al.  MRD in multiple myeloma: more questions than answers? , 2017, Blood Cancer Journal.

[54]  Samuel Achilefu,et al.  Preclinical Development of CD38-Targeted [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Daratumumab for Imaging Multiple Myeloma , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  T. Plesner,et al.  Monocytes and Granulocytes Reduce CD38 Expression Levels on Myeloma Cells in Patients Treated with Daratumumab , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[56]  O. Stephens,et al.  Spatial genomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma revealed by multi-region sequencing , 2017, Nature Communications.

[57]  F. Hodi,et al.  Monitoring immune-checkpoint blockade: response evaluation and biomarker development , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[58]  C. Dumontet,et al.  Monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma , 2017, Leukemia.

[59]  O. Press,et al.  Whither Radioimmunotherapy: To Be or Not To Be? , 2017, Cancer research.

[60]  J. Crowley,et al.  End points and statistical considerations in immuno-oncology trials: impact on multiple myeloma , 2017, Future oncology.

[61]  Bart Barlogie,et al.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[62]  Elias Mossialos,et al.  Assessment of Overall Survival, Quality of Life, and Safety Benefits Associated With New Cancer Medicines , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[63]  S. Lonial,et al.  Clinical Implications of Complex Pharmacokinetics for Daratumumab Dose Regimen in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma , 2017, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[64]  D. Avigan,et al.  Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in multiple myeloma: a dream or a reality? , 2017, Blood.

[65]  C. Bailly,et al.  Immuno-PET for Clinical Theranostic Approaches , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[66]  S. Agrawal,et al.  Model‐Based Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Nivolumab in Patients With Solid Tumors , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[67]  D. Kazandjian Multiple myeloma epidemiology and survival: A unique malignancy. , 2016, Seminars in oncology.

[68]  S. Lonial,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Daratumumab Following Intravenous Infusion in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Prior Proteasome Inhibitor and Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment , 2016, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[69]  J. Stone,et al.  Model‐Based Characterization of the Pharmacokinetics of Pembrolizumab: A Humanized Anti–PD‐1 Monoclonal Antibody in Advanced Solid Tumors , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[70]  R. Greil,et al.  T cells in multiple myeloma display features of exhaustion and senescence at the tumor site , 2016, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[71]  L. Siu,et al.  Approaches to modernize the combination drug development paradigm , 2016, Genome Medicine.

[72]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  M. Millenson,et al.  Nivolumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancy: Preliminary Results of a Phase Ib Study. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[75]  Clément Bailly,et al.  ImmunoPET to help stratify patients for targeted therapies and to improve drug development , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[76]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  CD38 expression and complement inhibitors affect response and resistance to daratumumab therapy in myeloma. , 2016, Blood.

[77]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[78]  A. Lesokhin,et al.  Immunotherapy , 2016, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[79]  Michael D. Robbins,et al.  Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM. , 2016, Blood.

[80]  J. Taube,et al.  Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[81]  F. Malavasi,et al.  Generation and Characterization of Microvesicles after Daratumumab Interaction with Myeloma Cells , 2015 .

[82]  S. Lonial,et al.  Target-Mediated Drug Disposition of Daratumumab Following Intravenous Infusion in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma after Prior Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis , 2015 .

[83]  J. Barbet,et al.  Single-Dose Anti-CD138 Radioimmunotherapy: Bismuth-213 is More Efficient than Lutetium-177 for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in a Preclinical Model , 2015, Front. Med..

[84]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma: current status and future perspectives , 2015, Leukemia.

[85]  J. Paton-Hough,et al.  A review of current murine models of multiple myeloma used to assess the efficacy of therapeutic agents on tumour growth and bone disease. , 2015, Bone.

[86]  T. Schumacher,et al.  Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy , 2015, Science.

[87]  G. V. van Dongen,et al.  Tumour targeting and radiation dose of radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-rituximab in CD20+ B-cell lymphoma as predicted by 89Zr-rituximab immuno-PET: impact of preloading with unlabelled rituximab , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[88]  J. Miguel,et al.  PD-L1/PD-1 presence in the tumor microenvironment and activity of PD-1 blockade in multiple myeloma , 2015, Leukemia.

[89]  Hans Erik Johnsen,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[90]  F. Kraeber-Bodéré,et al.  Comparative analysis of multiple myeloma treatment by CD138 antigen targeting with bismuth-213 and Melphalan chemotherapy. , 2014, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[91]  A. Deslandes Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of antibody-drug conjugates in first-in-human Phase 1 studies , 2014, mAbs.

[92]  P. Moreau,et al.  213Bi Radioimmunotherapy with an Anti-mCD138 Monoclonal Antibody in a Murine Model of Multiple Myeloma , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[93]  Lieping Chen,et al.  Marrow stromal cells induce B7-H1 expression on myeloma cells, generating aggressive characteristics in multiple myeloma , 2013, Leukemia.

[94]  C. Pott,et al.  (90)Yttrium-ibritumomab-tiuxetan as first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma: 30 months of follow-up data from an international multicenter phase II clinical trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[95]  Iain Gardner,et al.  Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Monoclonal Antibodies , 2013, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[96]  S. Singhal,et al.  A phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study of elotuzumab in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. , 2012, Blood.

[97]  Saileta Prabhu,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies: what are the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for drug development? , 2012, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[98]  M. Lubberink,et al.  Biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and scouting of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using 89Zr-ibritumomab tiuxetan and PET , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[99]  A. Scott,et al.  Monoclonal antibody dose determination and biodistribution into solid tumors. , 2011, Therapeutic delivery.

[100]  Jos H. Beijnen,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies , 2010, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[101]  T. Illidge Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma: a treatment approach ahead of its time or past its sell-by date? , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[102]  P. L. Jager,et al.  Biodistribution of 89Zr‐trastuzumab and PET Imaging of HER2‐Positive Lesions in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[103]  E. Dadachova Cancer therapy with alpha-emitters labeled peptides. , 2010, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[104]  A. Hagenbeek,et al.  Phase III trial of consolidation therapy with yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan compared with no additional therapy after first remission in advanced follicular lymphoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[105]  G. V. van Dongen,et al.  Immuno-PET: a navigator in monoclonal antibody development and applications. , 2007, The oncologist.

[106]  D. Rizzieri,et al.  Radioimmunotherapy for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. , 2005, Clinical medicine & research.

[107]  C. Howe Critical Reflection for Nursing and the Helping Professions: A User's Guide , 2002 .

[108]  Karen Halliwell,et al.  Critical Reflection For Nursing And The Helping Professions. A User's Guide , 2002 .

[109]  L. Gordon,et al.  Treatment with ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[110]  N. Pandit-Taskar Functional Imaging Methods for Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Current Status and Novel ImmunoPET Based Methods. , 2018, Seminars in hematology.

[111]  K. Hohloch Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma: an underestimated therapy option. , 2017, The Lancet. Haematology.

[112]  M. Martínez-Ramírez,et al.  Radioinmunoterapia en el linfoma no Hodgkin, posicionamiento, seguridad y eficacia de 90Y-ibritumomab. Experiencia y seguimiento a los 10 años , 2017 .

[113]  J. Verdú,et al.  Radioimmunotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; positioning, safety, and efficacy of 90Y-Ibritumomab. 10 years of experience and follow-up. , 2017, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular.

[114]  M. Naunton Lenalidomide and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma , 2013 .

[115]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Syndecan-1: a dynamic regulator of the myeloma microenvironment , 2007, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[116]  O. Cope,et al.  Multiple myeloma. , 1948, The New England journal of medicine.