"Turn that frown upside-down": A contextual account of emoticon usage on different virtual platforms

Evidence highlights the prevalent usage of emoticons within digital forms of textual communication and the impact on the recipient. However, little evidence demonstrates the interpersonal functions for the user and whether this varies as a product of virtual platform. This formed the basis for the current study in which participants (N?=?92) provided open-ended accounts of their reasons for using emoticons across three virtual platforms (email, text message, and social networking site), and their general emoticon usage across these. Responses revealed a number of themes on reasons for emoticon usage. The first was; "aiding personal expression", with sub-themes of; "establishing emotional tone"; and "to lighten the mood". Other themes were "reducing ambiguity of discourse" and "appropriateness of context". Overall, there was consistency across platforms, on both the personal and interpersonal functions which emoticons served. However, some disparity was identified as email platforms were deemed inappropriate for emoticon use, regardless of the fact that emoticons were recognised as important emotional aids for communication. Taken together these findings highlight the importance of emoticon usage for the user, through a contextual lens to recognise the influential factors upon these behaviours and the implications this has for digital text-based communication. In this regard, this contributes further conceptualisation of one aspect of hyperpersonal communication within virtual interactions, and how different platforms may permit these self-presentational efforts to a greater or lesser extent. Qualitative approach to understanding usage behaviour for emoticons.Contextual account of emoticon usage across digital platforms.Benefit to both user and recipient in their use of emoticons.

[1]  Helen J. Wall,et al.  Getting the balance right? A Mismatch in interaction demands between target and judge impacts on judgement accuracy for some traits but not others , 2016 .

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[3]  DAANTJE DERKS,et al.  Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Motives and Social Context , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  A. J. Fridlund Sociality of Solitary Smiling: Potentiation by an Implicit Audience , 1991 .

[5]  R. Kraut,et al.  Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. , 1979 .

[6]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2001 .

[7]  Paul Johns,et al.  Capturing the mood: facebook and face-to-face encounters in the workplace , 2014, CSCW.

[8]  R. Buck Social and emotional functions in facial expression and communication: the readout hypothesis , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[9]  J. Walther,et al.  Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Dimensions of Computer‐Mediated Communication , 2015 .

[10]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[11]  Margaret C. Rooney,et al.  The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men's use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites , 2015 .

[12]  Meeyoung Cha,et al.  Emoticon Style: Interpreting Differences in Emoticons Across Cultures , 2013, ICWSM.

[13]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  Emotional Expression Online: the Impact of Task, Relationship and Personality Perception on Emoticon Usage in Instant Messenger , 2007, PACIS.

[14]  Stacey M. Conchie,et al.  Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy of personality judgments , 2013 .

[15]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre‐service teachers' intention to use technology: A Turkish study , 2011 .

[16]  J. Walther Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[17]  David C. Yen,et al.  Exploring the potential effects of emoticons , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Same Same But Different!? The Differential Influence of Smilies and Emoticons on Person Perception , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Howard S. Friedman,et al.  Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private : self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues , 1991 .

[20]  N. Epley,et al.  Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think? , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  D. Keltner,et al.  Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  Karianne Skovholt,et al.  The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: : -) , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[24]  C. Randall Colvin,et al.  Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. , 1991 .

[25]  Alecia Wolf,et al.  Emotional Expression Online: Gender Differences in Emoticon Use , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  B. Crabtree,et al.  A Template Approach to Text Analysis: Developing and Using Codebooks , 1992 .

[27]  A. J. Chapman,et al.  Social enhancement of laughter: an experimental analysis of some companion variables. , 1976, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  Karen L. Schmidt,et al.  Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: automatic movement in solitary and social smiles , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[29]  Erin M. Richard,et al.  Influence of Emoticons on Perceived Negative Affect and Professionalism in Work-related Email , 2013 .

[30]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[31]  S. Utz Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. , 2000 .

[32]  Daantje Derks,et al.  Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  L. Lomas,et al.  Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education , 2003 .