BACKGROUND
Because of advances in voice research, voice acoustic analysis including fundamental frequency (F0), sound pressure level (SPL), jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio (H/N ratio), and maximum phonation time (MPT) can now be easily recorded and analyzed with a computer. Because these systems are widely used in clinical practice, this study was designed to establish the normal acoustic analysis parameters in normal Taiwanese adults.
METHODS
From Mar. 2002 to Dec. 2002, 45 Taiwanese women and 45 Taiwanese men younger than 50 years old were recruited as subjects for this study. The commercially available Computer Speech Lab and Aerophone II system manufactured by Kay Elemetrics Corp. were used to record the aforementioned acoustic data under comfortable phonation. Each gender was separated equally into 3 age subgroups. Then differences between gender and age subgroups were investigated by statistics software SPSS 10.0. Our results were compared with data from previous reports.
RESULTS
The value of F0 (counting; vowel /a/) was greater for females (203.2 +/- 21.7; 213.4 +/- 25.4 Hz) than for males (118.3 +/- 17.3; 121.3 +/- 16.4 Hz). Conversely, the value of MPT was greater for males (28.0 +/- 9.4 sec) than for females (22.6 +/- 7.6 sec). There were no significant differences in average SPL and jitter between female (77.8 +/- 5.5 dB; 0.66 +/- 0.27%) and male (77.5 +/- 5.5 dB; 0.56 +/- 0.23%) subgroups. Except for shimmer and H/N ratio in the male subgroup, there were no differences in parameters within both gender subgroups with respect to age.
CONCLUSIONS
We have developed a body of normal data for various parameters of acoustic analysis in different age groups and genders. It seems that the majority of voice characteristics of adults were relatively stable and did not change with aging between 20 and 49. But the shimmer and H/N ratio were variable in different genders and age groups. However, the voice characteristics of adults older than 50 years old were not recorded in this study and therefore require further investigation.
[1]
C. I. H. hui.
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.
,
2003
.
[2]
G. Arnold.
Vocal rehabilitation of paralytic dysphonia. II. Acoustic analysis of vocal function.
,
1955,
A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.
[3]
V. Wolfe,et al.
Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.
,
1991,
Journal of speech and hearing research.
[4]
S. Sapir.
The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations
,
1989
.
[5]
S. Linville,et al.
Acoustic-perceptual studies of aging voice in women*
,
1987
.
[6]
M P Gelfer,et al.
Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: effects on measures of phonatory stability.
,
1995,
Journal of speech and hearing research.
[7]
J Kreiman,et al.
Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement.
,
1993,
Journal of speech and hearing research.
[8]
Eiji Yumoto,et al.
The Quantitative Evaluation of Hoarseness: A New Harmonics to Noise Ratio Method
,
1983
.
[9]
Raymond D. Kent,et al.
Quantitative description of the dysarthria in women with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
,
1992,
Journal of speech and hearing research.
[10]
S. Zeitels,et al.
CURRENT DIAGNOSTICS AND OFFICE PRACTICE: Appropriate use of objective measures of vocal function in the multidisciplinary management of voice disorders
,
1997
.
[11]
N. Isshiki.
Physiology of Speech Production
,
1989
.
[12]
N. Isshiki.
Assessment of Vocal Function
,
1989
.
[13]
E. Yumoto,et al.
The quantitative evaluation of hoarseness.
,
1983,
Archives of otolaryngology.
[14]
M. Trudeau,et al.
Changes in sustained production tasks among women with bilateral vocal nodules before and after voice therapy.
,
1997,
Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.