Quality and safety in outpatient laboratory testing.

Interactions between the laboratory and outpatient physician are critical to ensure the appropriateness, accuracy, and utility of laboratory results. A recent Institute of Medicine report suggested that the consequences of medical errors in the outpatient setting-and the opportunities to improve-"may dwarf those in hospitals." This article focuses on the role of the physician's office in laboratory quality.

[1]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Stopping the error cascade: a report on ameliorators from the ASIPS collaborative , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[2]  D. Cherry,et al.  National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary. , 2004, Advance data.

[3]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Event Reporting to a Primary Care Patient Safety Reporting System: A Report From the ASIPS Collaborative , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[5]  J W Mold,et al.  Management of laboratory test results in family practice. An OKPRN study. Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  David W. Bates,et al.  Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  Meza Jp,et al.  Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. , 2000 .

[8]  G. A. Loomis,et al.  If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? , 2002, The Journal of family practice.

[9]  David W Bates,et al.  Communicating critical test results: safe practice recommendations. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[10]  P. Aspden.  Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care , 2004 .

[11]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[12]  S. Dovey,et al.  Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[13]  G E Fryer,et al.  The ecology of medical care revisited. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  B. McCarthy,et al.  Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  J. Westfall,et al.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits. , 2005, JAMA.

[16]  A. Boonstra,et al.  The Limited Acceptance of an Electronic Prescription System by General Practitioners: Reasons and Practical Implications , 2004 .

[17]  M Plebani,et al.  Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  Physicians and Electronic Health Records , 2007 .

[19]  John Hickner,et al.  The Testing Process in Family Medicine: Problems, Solutions and Barriers as Seen by Physicians and Their Staff: A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network , 2006 .

[20]  D J Boone,et al.  Toward optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary care. , 1996, JAMA.

[21]  D. Bates.  Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. , 2005, Health affairs.

[22]  Kaveh G Shojania,et al.  Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  Harold C. Sox.  Saving Office Practice , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  David W Bates,et al.  "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  Sherry Holcomb,et al.  Problems in Laboratory Testing in Primary Care , 1996 .

[26]  D. Cherry,et al.  National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary. , 2003, Advance data.