Equations to establish a regression between current units with respect to patient`s age and the use time of cochlear implants.

Objective Propose a system of multivariate multiple regression equations in order to establish a mathematical association that allows estimating the current units needed during the adjustment phase with respect to age and time that were used the implants. Method Descriptive cross-sectional study. A total of 41 pediatric patients with a unilateral cochlear implant participated. Three groups were formed and multivariable multiple regression equations were constructed. Results For Group 1, in electrode Groups 3 and 4, there is a lower standard deviation and a similar index of asymmetry of the current units; in Group 2, the groups of electrodes with similar index of asymmetry were 2 and 4, while group of electrodes 3 presented average of 21.54 and dispersion smaller (16.25); in Group 3, groups of electrodes 3 and 4 presented similar standard deviation and average and smaller standard deviation. With respect to the standard estimation error, the lowest variability of current units was obtained in Group 2 for electrode Group 3. Conclusion The proposed equations could be used in the clinical area by knowing the units current needed with respect to age and time of use the implant.

[1]  Philipp Spitzer,et al.  Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users , 2018, Cochlear implants international.

[2]  Ayman Kamal,et al.  Comparison Between Behavioral, Modified Brown ECAP, ESRT Approaches in Cochlear Implants Fitting in Adults , 2017 .

[3]  Rosa Isela Banda González,et al.  Parámetros de programación del implante coclear , 2017 .

[4]  F. Christov,et al.  ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patient's age and electrode-design. , 2016, European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases.

[5]  S. Díaz-Leines,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between cognitive skills and unilateral sensory hearing loss. , 2016, Neurologia.

[6]  B. Backus,et al.  The relationship between electrical auditory brainstem responses and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic® SP cochlear implant users , 2015, Cochlear implants international.

[7]  R. S. Dr. CLINICAL CORRELATION OF MULTIMODALITY ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT WITH PSYCHOPHYSICAL BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES , 2014 .

[8]  Ileana Gutiérrez-Farfán,et al.  Modificación de umbrales T en pacientes con implante coclear como una alternativa de programación en relación con el tiempo , 2014 .

[9]  M.C. Leal,et al.  The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant , 2014, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[10]  Julie Kosaner,et al.  Cochlear Implant Programming: A Global Survey on the State of the Art , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[11]  P. Raj,et al.  Mapping of Paediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients using EABR as a Tool , 2014 .

[12]  M. Kameswaran,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Behavioral Comfort Levels in Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective Study , 2015, Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.

[13]  Manuel Rodríguez,et al.  Organisation of a Cochlear Implant Programme , 2013 .

[14]  T. Bradham,et al.  Cochlear implant programming. , 2012, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[15]  B. Kostek,et al.  Evoked Stapedius Reflex and Compound Action Potential Thresholds versus Most Comfortable Loudness Level: Assessment of Their Relation for Charge-Based Fitting Strategies in Implant Users , 2011, ORL.

[16]  B. Kostek,et al.  ESRT, ART, and MCL Correlations in Experienced Paediatric Cochlear Implant Users , 2004, Cochlear implants international.

[17]  A. Morant,et al.  La implantacin coclear peditrica en el periodo crtico de la va auditiva, nuestra experiencia , 2009 .

[18]  J. Niparko,et al.  Electric Charge Requirements of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients Enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation Study , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  L. Olgun,et al.  Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold. , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[21]  Blake C Papsin,et al.  Toward a Battery of Behavioral and Objective Measures to Achieve Optimal Cochlear Implant Stimulation Levels in Children , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[22]  A. Lorens,et al.  ESRT and MCL correlations in experienced paediatric cochlear implant users. , 2004, Cochlear implants international.

[23]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Coding of Sounds in the Auditory System and Its Relevance to Signal Processing and Coding in Cochlear Implants , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  Kristen L Dawson,et al.  Relationship between Electrical Stapedial Reflex Thresholds and HiRes TM Program Settings : Potential Tool for Pediatric Cochlear-Implant Fitting , 2003 .

[25]  F. Scott,et al.  Measurement of comfort levels by means of electrical stapedial reflex in children. , 2001, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.