Dynamic size spectrometry of airborne microorganisms: Laboratory evaluation and calibration

Bioaerosol samplers need to be calibrated for the microorganisms of interest. The Aerosizer, a relatively new aerodynamic size spectrometer, is shown to be a suitable dynamic instrument for the evaluation and calibration of such samplers in the laboratory, prior to their use in the field. It provides the necessary reference count against which the microbiological response of the sampler can be compared. It measures the health-significant aerodynamic diameters of microorganisms down to 0.5 μm, thus including most of the bacteria, fungi and pollen found in outdoor and indoor air environments. Comparison tests with a laser size spectrometer indicate that the suspension of microorganisms needs to be washed several times before aerosolization to avoid coating of the airborne microorganisms with nutrients and microbial slime from the suspension, and to reduce the residue particles to sizes below the lowest size of the aerosolized microorganisms.

[1]  J. Jones,et al.  An investigation of errors in direct counts of aquatic bacteria by epifluorescence microscopy, with reference to a new method for dyeing membrane filters. , 1975, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[2]  A. Nevalainen,et al.  Inlet characteristics of bioaerosol samplers , 1994 .

[3]  C. Davies Farmer's LungA Joint Meeting of the Medical Research Council and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 23rd January, 1968 , 1968 .

[4]  H. Burge,et al.  Allergen carriage by atmospheric aerosol. I. Ragweed pollen determinants in smaller micronic fractions. , 1983, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[5]  A. Nevalainen Bacterial aerosols in indoor air , 1989 .

[6]  R. E. Buchanan,et al.  Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. , 1975 .

[7]  W. Roper,et al.  The new tuberculosis. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. McGee,et al.  Airborne microbial contaminants in indoor environments. Naturally ventilated and air-conditioned homes. , 1986, Archives of environmental health.

[9]  P. Morey,et al.  Biological Contaminants in Indoor Environments , 1990 .

[10]  Susanne V. Hering,et al.  Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants , 1989 .

[11]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Calibration and performance of an API Aerosizer , 1993 .

[12]  A A ANDERSEN,et al.  NEW SAMPLER FOR THE COLLECTION, SIZING, AND ENUMERATION OF VIABLE AIRBORNE PARTICLES, , 1958, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  K Willeke,et al.  Evaluation of counting error due to colony masking in bioaerosol sampling , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  K. Willeke,et al.  Impaction onto a Glass Slide or Agar versus Impingement into a Liquid for the Collection and Recovery of Airborne Microorganisms , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[15]  J. Frank,et al.  Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants. , 1989, Journal of food protection.

[16]  J. Frank,et al.  Comparison of Airborne Microflora Collected by the Andersen Sieve Sampler and RCS Sampler in a Dairy Processing Plant. , 1989, Journal of food protection.

[17]  W. F. Todd,et al.  Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[18]  Harriet A. Burge,et al.  Sampling and analysis of biological aerosols , 1987 .

[19]  J. Frank,et al.  Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment. , 1989, Journal of food protection.

[20]  Paul A. Baron,et al.  Calibration and Use of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3300) , 1986 .

[21]  G Murphy,et al.  Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Method and test system for evaluation of bioaerosol samplers , 1994 .

[23]  R. Riley,et al.  Infectiousness of air from a tuberculosis ward. Ultraviolet irradiation of infected air: comparative infectiousness of different patients. , 1962, The American review of respiratory disease.

[24]  W. D. Griffiths,et al.  Behavior of Compact Nonspherical Particles in the TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer Model APS33B: Ultra-Stokesian Drag Forces , 1993 .

[25]  D. Fraser LEGIONELLOSIS: EVIDENCE OF AIRBORNE TRANSMISSION , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Performance of bioaerosol samplers: collection characteristics and sampler design considerations , 1992 .

[27]  R. Stanier,et al.  The Bacteria: A treatise on structure and function. Vol. Ill: Biosynthesis. Vol. IY: The physiology of growth. , 1960 .

[28]  C. N. Davies,et al.  The Mechanics of Aerosols , 1964 .

[29]  G. Kasper,et al.  Bipolar diffusion charging of fibrous aerosol particles. I: Charging theory , 1984 .

[30]  A. A. Miles,et al.  Topley and Wilson's Principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity. Volume 1: general microbiology and immunity. Volume 2: systematic bacteriology. , 1983 .

[31]  N. Palleroni Family I. Pseudomonadaceae , 1989 .

[32]  K. R. May,et al.  The Efficiency of Various Liquid Impinger Samplers in Bacterial Aerosols , 1957, British journal of industrial medicine.

[33]  John E. Brockmann,et al.  APS Response to Nonspherical Particles and Experimental Determination of Dynamic Shape Factor , 1990 .