Clinical performance of fluorescence-based methods for detection of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.

We aimed to investigate the performance of fluorescence-based methods (FBMs), compared to visual inspection after histological validation, in detecting and assessing the activity status of occlusal carious lesions in primary teeth. One examiner evaluated 50 primary molars close to exfoliation in 24 children. Teeth were assessed using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and pen-type laser fluorescence (LFpen). After exfoliation, histological validation was performed. Teeth were cut and sections were evaluated for lesion depth and activity status (after utilization of a pH indicator) under a stereomicroscope. Parameters related to the performance of the methods in detecting caries lesions at two thresholds (initial and dentin lesions) were calculated. Regarding the activity status, lesions were classified into sound+inactive or active, and the area under the ROC curve and the diagnostic odds ratio values of the methods were calculated and compared. Evaluation of red fluorescence using QLF presented higher sensitivity but lower specificity than visual inspection in detecting dentin caries lesions. However, QLF considering different parameters and LFpen had similar performance to that obtained with visual inspection. Regarding activity assessment, all FBMs and visual inspection also presented similar performance. In conclusion, FBMs did not prove advantageous for the detection and activity assessment of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars when compared to visual inspection.

[1]  M. Diniz,et al.  Association between quantitative measures obtained using fluorescence‐based methods and activity status of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars , 2017, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[2]  Bo-Ra Kim,et al.  Ecological changes in oral microcosm biofilm during maturation , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  George J. Eckert,et al.  Orange/Red Fluorescence of Active Caries by Retrospective Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence Image Analysis , 2016, Caries Research.

[4]  G. Eckert,et al.  In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods , 2015, Caries Research.

[5]  C. Deery,et al.  Visual Inspection for Caries Detection , 2015, Journal of dental research.

[6]  Daniela G Bittar,et al.  Is the red fluorescence of dental plaque related to its cariogenicity? , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  T M Ardenghi,et al.  Validation of Visual Caries Activity Assessment , 2014, Journal of dental research.

[8]  M. Braga,et al.  Influence of examiner experience on clinical performance of visual inspection in detecting and assessing the activity status of caries lesions. , 2013, Operative dentistry.

[9]  C. Deery,et al.  Fluorescence-Based Methods for Detecting Caries Lesions: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Sources of Heterogeneity , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  M. Braga,et al.  Radiographic and Laser Fluorescence Methods Have No Benefits for Detecting Caries in Primary Teeth , 2012, Caries Research.

[11]  G. Eckert,et al.  The Natural History of Dental Caries Lesions , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[12]  Fausto Medeiros Mendes,et al.  New methodology to assess activity status of occlusal caries in primary teeth using laser fluorescence device. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  Mariana M Braga,et al.  Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. , 2010, Dental clinics of North America.

[14]  G. Eckert,et al.  Use of ICDAS Combined with Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence as a Caries Detection Method , 2010, Caries Research.

[15]  K. Ekstrand,et al.  Clinical Performance of Two Visual Scoring Systems in Detecting and Assessing Activity Status of Occlusal Caries in Primary Teeth , 2010, Caries Research.

[16]  Susan M. Higham,et al.  Quantified light-induced fluorescence, review of a diagnostic tool in prevention of oral disease , 2009 .

[17]  N B Pitts,et al.  The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. , 2007, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[18]  Sofia Tranæus,et al.  In vivo detection of non-cavitated caries lesions on occlusal surfaces by visual inspection and quantitative light-induced fluorescence , 2007, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[19]  A. Lussi,et al.  Detection of Approximal Caries with a New Laser Fluorescence Device , 2006, Caries Research.

[20]  James D Bader,et al.  A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. , 2004, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[21]  Elbert de Josselin de Jong,et al.  Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF)--a potential method for the dental practitioner. , 2003, Quintessence international.

[22]  V Machiulskiene,et al.  Construct and Predictive Validity of Clinical Caries Diagnostic Criteria Assessing Lesion Activity , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[23]  James D Bader,et al.  A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. , 2002, Journal of public health dentistry.

[24]  V. Baelum,et al.  Reliability of a New Caries Diagnostic System Differentiating between Active and Inactive Caries Lesions , 1999, Caries Research.

[25]  A. Lussi,et al.  Performance and Reproducibility of a Laser Fluorescence System for Detection of Occlusal Caries in vitro , 1999, Caries Research.

[26]  E. Kidd,et al.  Detection, Diagnosing, Monitoring and Logical Treatment of Occlusal Caries in Relation to Lesion Activity and Severity: An in vivo Examination with Histological Validation , 1998, Caries Research.

[27]  R. Hibst,et al.  Detection of Occlusal Caries by Laser Fluorescence: Basic and Clinical Investigations , 2001 .