Risk Factors of Dystocia in Nulliparous Women

Background: Detection of women at risk for dystocia will allow physicians to make preparations and treatment decisions that can minimize maternal and neonatal morbidity. We aimed to determine the risk factors for dystocia in nulliparous women. Methods: This case series enrolled 447 nulliparous women who presented with a single pregnancy in the vertex presentation and gestational age of 38-42 weeks. Maternal anthropometric measurements were obtained upon admission. We defined dystocia as a cesarean section or vacuum delivery for abnormal progression of labor as evidenced by the presence of effective uterine contractions, cervical dilation of less than 1 cm/h in the active phase for 2 h, duration of the second stage beyond 2 h, or fetal head descent less than 1 cm/h. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 11.5. Kruskal-Wallis, logistic regression, chi-square, Student’s t test and the Mann-Whitney tests were used as appropriated. Results: The state anxiety score (OR=10.58, CI: 1.97-56.0), posterior head position (OR=9.53, CI: 4.68-19.36), fetal head swelling in the second stage of labor (OR=6.85, CI: 2.60-18.01), transverse diagonal of Michaelis sacral ≤9.6 cm (OR=6.19, CI: 2.49-15.40), and height to fundal ratio <4.7 (OR=2.68, CI: 1.09-10.60) were significant risk factors for dystocia. Conclusion: Critical care during labor and delivery in women who have a height to fundal height ratio of <4.7 or transverse diagonal of Michaelis sacral ≤9.6 cm, an anxiety score greater than moderate, and posterior head position or fetal head swelling during the second phase could play an effective and important role in preventing dystocia.

[1]  L. V. van Bogaert The relation between height, foot length, pelvic adequacy and mode of delivery. , 1999, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  S. Meuris,et al.  Association between external pelvimetry and vertex delivery complications in African women , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  Magowan Drife Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 2014 .

[4]  S. Kirchengast,et al.  Short stature is associated with an increased risk of Caesarean deliveries in low risk population , 2007 .

[5]  M. Boulvain,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  M. Boulvain,et al.  Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[8]  M. O’Dowd,et al.  The History of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 1994 .

[9]  Margaret F. Myles,et al.  A Textbook for Midwives , 1954 .

[10]  S. Pinjaroen,et al.  Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[11]  M. Hedegaard,et al.  Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  L. Bogaert The relation between height, foot length, pelvic adequacy and mode of delivery. , 1999 .

[13]  Peter Vock,et al.  MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  L. K. Brown,et al.  Myles textbook for midwives , 1989 .

[15]  W. Yoong,et al.  The relationship of ethnicity, maternal height and shoe size, and method of delivery , 2011, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[16]  George Turabelidze,et al.  Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  M. Divon,et al.  Efficacy of the maternal height to fundal height ratio in predicting arrest of labor disorders. , 1997, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[18]  W. Thitadilok,et al.  Risk factors of caesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[19]  P. Mckenna,et al.  A new predictor of cephalopelvic disproportion? , 2003, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[20]  R. H. Philpott Obstructed labour. , 1980, Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  N. Lowe A review of factors associated with dystocia and cesarean section in nulliparous women. , 2007, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[22]  J. Patumanond,et al.  Validation of risk scoring scheme for cesarean delivery due to cephalopelvic disproportion in Lamphun Hospital. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[23]  E. Sheiner,et al.  Risk factors and perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated with cephalopelvic disproportion: a population-based study , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[24]  W. Grobman,et al.  Methods of clinical prediction. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Z. Merhi,et al.  Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: an analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data , 2007, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.