Ontology Analysis on Complexity and Evolution Based on Conceptual Model

With the tremendous development in size, the complexity of ontology increases. Thus ontology evaluation becomes extremely important for developers to determine the fundamental characteristics of ontologies in order to improve the quality, estimate cost and reduce future maintenance. Our research examines the concepts and their hierarchy in ontology conceptual model, the common feature of most ontologies, which reflects the fundamental complexity. We suggest some well-defined metrics of complexity, which mainly examine the quantity, ratio and correlativity of concepts and relationships, to evaluate ontology from the viewpoint of complexity and evolution. In the study, we measured three ontologies in Gene Ontology to verify our metrics. The results indicate that these metrics works well, and the biological process ontology is the most complex one from the view of complexity, and the molecular function ontology is the unsteadiest one from the view of evolution.

[1]  Wei Wu,et al.  Industrial Strength Ontology Management , 2001, The Emerging Semantic Web.

[2]  Spencer Rugaber,et al.  Analyzing the conceptual integrity of computing applications through ontological excavation and analysis , 2005 .

[3]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Knowledge Processes and Ontologies , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[4]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages , 2000, EKAW.

[5]  Baowen Xu,et al.  A complexity measure for ontology based on UML , 2004, Proceedings. 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, 2004. FTDCS 2004..

[6]  Boris Motik,et al.  Ontology Evolution within Ontology Editors , 2002, EON.

[7]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[8]  Idris Hsi,et al.  Analyzing the Conceptual Coherence of Computing Applications Through Ontological Excavation , 2004 .

[9]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of the DAML Ontologies for the Semantic Web , 2003, NLDB.

[10]  Boris Motik,et al.  User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management , 2002, EKAW.

[11]  Tore Risch,et al.  EDUTELLA: a P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF , 2002, WWW.

[12]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Semi-automatic Composition ofWeb Services using Semantic Descriptions , 2003, WSMAI.

[13]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[14]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Letha H. Etzkorn,et al.  Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application , 2005 .

[16]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Ontologies and the semantic web , 2008, CACM.