Superresolution spatial compounding techniques with application to 3D breast ultrasound imaging

Standard spatial compounding, via averaging acquisitions from different angles, has proved to be an efficient technique for speckle pattern reduction in ultrasound B-mode images. However, the resulting images may be blurred due to the averaging of point spread functions and the misalignment of the different views. These blurring artefacts result in a loss of important anatomical features that may be critical for medical diagnosis. In this paper, we evaluate some spatial compounding techniques, focusing on how to combine the different acquisitions. The evaluated methods are: weighed averaging, wavelet coefficient fusion and multiview deconvolution. To some extent, these techniques take into account the limitations of spatial compounding, by proposing alternative fusion methods that can reduce speckle artefacts while preserving standard spatial resolution and anatomical features. We experimented these compounding methods with synthetic images to show that these advanced techniques could outperform traditional averaging. In particular, multiview deconvolution techniques performed best, showing improvement in respect to averaging (6.81 dB) for realistic levels of speckle noise and spatial degradation. Wavelet fusion technique ranked second (2.25 dB), and weighted average third (0.70 dB). On the other hand, weighted averaging was the least time consuming, followed by wavelet fusion (x2) and multiview deconvolution (x5). Wavelet fusion offered an interesting trade-off between performance and computational cost. Experiments on 3D breast ultrasound imaging, showed consistent results with those obtained on synthetic images. Tissue was linearly scanned with a 2D probe in different directions, and volumes were compounded using the aforementioned techniques. This resulted in a high-resolution volume, with better tissue delineation and less speckle patterning.

[1]  Sant Longowal,et al.  Wavelet-based statistical approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images , 2004 .

[2]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Anisotropic Diffusion of Ultrasound Constrained by Speckle Noise Model . , 2004 .

[3]  Gemma Piella,et al.  A general framework for multiresolution image fusion: from pixels to regions , 2003, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  T. Taxt,et al.  Two-dimensional noise-robust blind deconvolution of ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Chrysostomos L. Nikias,et al.  EVAM: an eigenvector-based algorithm for multichannel blind deconvolution of input colored signals , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Multi-sensor image fusion using the wavelet transform , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[12]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Robust anisotropic diffusion , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Nihat M. Bilgutay,et al.  Wavelet domain least squares deconvolution for ultrasonic backscattered signals , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[14]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  LV volume quantification via spatiotemporal analysis of real-time 3-D echocardiography , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  A Bayesian approach for edge detection in medical ultrasound images , 1998 .

[16]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Adaptive speckle reduction filter for log-compressed B-scan images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  Gabriella Cincotti,et al.  Frequency decomposition and compounding of ultrasound medical images with wavelet packets , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Thomas Brox,et al.  On the Equivalence of Soft Wavelet Shrinkage, Total Variation Diffusion, Total Variation Regularization, and SIDEs , 2004, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[20]  X. Hao,et al.  A novel multiscale nonlinear thresholding method for ultrasonic speckle suppressing. , 1999, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[21]  P.L. Carson,et al.  Rapid elastic image registration for 3-D ultrasound , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  Assessment of visual quality and spatial accuracy of fast anisotropic diffusion and scan conversion algorithms for real-time three-dimensional spherical ultrasound , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[23]  Richard W Prager,et al.  Speckle detection for 3D ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[24]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[25]  Roy W. Martin,et al.  Three-dimensional spatial compounding of ultrasound scans with incidence angle weighting , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[26]  Ramesh A. Gopinath,et al.  Wavelet based speckle reduction with application to SAR based ATD/R , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[27]  Patrick R. Hunziker,et al.  Multidimensional, multistage wavelet footprints: a new tool for image segmentation and feature extraction in medical ultrasound , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  S. D. Silverstein,et al.  Optimum displacement for compound image generation in medical ultrasound , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[30]  P. Soler VOLUME RECONSTRUCTION OF BREAST ECHOGRAPHY FROM ANISOTROPICALLY DEGRADATED SCANS , 2004 .

[31]  Mark S. Nixon,et al.  Temporal methods for ultrasound speckle reduction , 1993 .