The Things We Talk About When We Talk About Browsing: An Empirical Typology of Library Browsing Behavior

Libraries increasingly offer much of their collection online, rendering it invisible or unavailable to readers who, for reasons of information experience, prefer to browse the shelves. Although the evidence that shelf browsing is an important part of information behavior is increasing, information browsing as a behavior is somewhat of a black box (in contrast to web browsing, which is relatively well understood). It seems likely from early work that browsing is not, in fact, a monolithic behavior, but rather a set of behaviors and goals. The typologies presented in these works, however, are of a too high level to offer much insight into what support is needed for successful online browsing. In contrast, a recent spate of speculative browsing technologies meet some browsing needs, but offer little theoretical understanding of how systems support browsing. The major contribution of this article is a new typology of library browsing behavior based on recent observations of browsing behavior in libraries. The secondary contribution is an understanding of the interface features that would support these types of information browsers in an online environment.

[1]  Dana McKay,et al.  Down the Superhighway in a Single Tome: Examining the Impact of Book Format on Borrowing Interactions , 2015, OZCHI.

[2]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  What do faculty and students really think about e-books? , 2007, Aslib Proc..

[3]  Tom Wilson,et al.  Models in Information Behavior Research , 1999 .

[4]  Dana McKay,et al.  Manoeuvres in the Dark: Design Implications of the Physical Mechanics of Library Shelf Browsing , 2017, CHIIR.

[5]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[6]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 2: A classification framework , 2012, J. Documentation.

[7]  James A. Larson,et al.  Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG2.7 Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, Ellivuori, Finland, 10-14 August 1992 , 1992, Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction.

[8]  George Buchanan,et al.  A library or just another information resource? A case study of users' mental models of traditional and digital libraries , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[10]  Dana McKay,et al.  Lend me some sugar: Borrowing rates of neighbouring books as evidence for browsing , 2014, IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.

[11]  Shanton Chang,et al.  Exploration without keywords: the bookfish case , 2014, OZCHI.

[12]  Ann Blandford,et al.  From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries , 2003, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[13]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A sign of a good book: readers' methods of accessing fiction in the public library , 2013, J. Documentation.

[14]  D. Reutzel,et al.  The Art of Children's Book Selection: A Labyrinth Unexplored , 1997 .

[15]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Readers' search strategies for accessing books in public libraries , 2012, IIiX.

[16]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogsstill hard to use , 1996 .

[17]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Experiences of the library in the digital age. , 2006 .

[18]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  Taking a Book off the Shelf in a Virtual Library , 2017, 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL).

[19]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[20]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection , 1997, CHI.

[21]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Jennifer Pearson,et al.  HCI design principles for ereaders , 2010, BooksOnline '10.

[23]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Accessing and Browsing Information and Communication , 2001 .

[24]  George Buchanan,et al.  It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it: Design guidelines to better support online browsing , 2018, ASIST.

[25]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[26]  Ann Blandford,et al.  “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Mark Mazzara,et al.  Browsing , 2006, Science.

[28]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[29]  Stephann Makri,et al.  'Too Much Serendipity': The Tension between Information Seeking and Encountering at the Library Shelves , 2017, CHIIR.

[30]  Robert M. Losee The Relative Shelf Location of Circulated Books: A Study of Classification, Users, and Browsing. , 1993 .

[31]  Ann Blandford,et al.  DiCoT: A Methodology for Applying Distributed Cognition to the Design of Teamworking Systems , 2005, DSV-IS.

[32]  Mitchell Whitelaw,et al.  Generous Interfaces for Digital Cultural Collections , 2015, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[33]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Reading and Writing the Electronic Book , 2009, Reading and Writing the Electronic Book.

[34]  Denise E. Agosto Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[36]  Annika Hinze,et al.  Social information behaviour in physical libraries: Implications for the design of digital libraries , 2014, IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.

[37]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: A process model , 2012, J. Documentation.

[38]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  What is browsing - really? A model drawing from behavioural science research , 2007, Inf. Res..

[39]  Micheline Hancock-Beaulieu,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of an Online Library Catalogue on subject Searching behaviour at the Catalogue and T the shelves , 1991, J. Documentation.

[40]  Francis Celoria The Archaeology of Serendip. , 1969 .

[41]  Md. Anwarul Islam,et al.  Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology: Analysis of two decades of published research , 2020, ASIST.

[42]  Jérôme Dupire,et al.  Experiments Towards 3D Immersive Interaction for Digital Libraries , 2006, Edutainment.

[43]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design - Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[44]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  The bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization , 2012, CHI.

[45]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[46]  Ragnar Nordlie,et al.  “User revealment”—a comparison of initial queries and ensuing question development in online searching and in human reference interactions , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[47]  Barbara H. Kwasnik,et al.  A Descriptive Study of the Functional Components of Browsing , 1992, Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction.

[48]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[49]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  STAK – Serendipitous tool for augmenting knowledge: A conceptual tool for bridging digital and physical resources , 2017 .

[50]  Kamy Ooi,et al.  How Adult Fiction Readers Select Fiction Books  in Public Libraries: a Study of Information-Seeking in Context , 2008 .

[51]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[52]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Question types in public libraries' digital reference service in Finland: Comparing 1999 and 2006 , 2009 .

[53]  Annika Hinze,et al.  Book selection behavior in the physical library: implications for ebook collections , 2012, JCDL '12.

[54]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries , 1997, DL '97.

[55]  Michael D. Cooper,et al.  Usage patterns of a web-based library catalog , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[56]  Nina Clements,et al.  e-Browsing: Serendipity and questions of access and discovery , 2014 .

[57]  Nina Reeves,et al.  An ethnographic study of music information seeking: implications for the design of a music digital library , 2003, 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2003. Proceedings..

[58]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Turning the page on navigation , 2005, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '05).

[59]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why Are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use? , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[60]  Eike Kleiner Blended shelf: reality-based presentation and exploration of library collections , 2013, ISI.

[61]  Dion Hoe-Lian Goh,et al.  In search of query patterns: A case study of a university OPAC , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[62]  Elizabeth B. Cooksey,et al.  Too Important to Be Left to Chance—Serendipity and the Digital Library , 2004 .

[63]  George Buchanan,et al.  In the bookshop: examining popular search strategies , 2011, JCDL '11.

[64]  George Buchanan,et al.  Tyranny of Distance: Understanding Academic Library Browsing by Refining the Neighbour Effect , 2015, TPDL.

[65]  Jarmo Saarti Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction , 1997 .

[66]  Jennifer Pearson,et al.  The Digital Reading Desk: A lightweight approach to digital note-taking , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[67]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .