Emergent features, attention, and object perception.

The perceptual processing of arrows and triangles and of their component angles and lines was explored in a number of different tasks. The results suggest that some analysis of shapes into simpler parts occurs preattentively, because these parts can recombine to form illusory conjunctions when attention is divided. The presence of "emergent features," such as closure or arrow junctions, was inferred from predicted correlations in the pattern of performance across tasks and across individual subjects. Thus triangles (for most subjects) and arrows (for some subjects) behave as if they had a perceptual feature that is absent from their parts and that mediates parallel detection in search and easy texture segregation. For some subjects, circles could apparently supply the additional feature (presumably closure) required to form illusory triangles from their component lines, whereas for other subjects circles had no effect. The fact that triangle lines can form illusory conjunctions with another shape makes it unlikely that triangles are perceived holistically and strengthens the interpretation that relies on emergent features. Language: en

[1]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  Dimensions of similarity. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[3]  Oliver G. Selfridge,et al.  Pattern recognition by machine , 1960 .

[4]  G. Lockhead Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[6]  J. Beck Perceptual grouping produced by line figures , 1967 .

[7]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  T. Bever,et al.  The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. , 1970 .

[9]  G. Lockhead Identification and the form of multidimensional discrimination space. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  M. B. Clowes,et al.  On Seeing Things , 1971, Artif. Intell..

[11]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[12]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[13]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[14]  David L. Waltz,et al.  Understanding Line drawings of Scenes with Shadows , 1975 .

[15]  J. Cutting Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening. , 1976, Psychological review.

[16]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[17]  Lawrence C. Sager,et al.  Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  K H Shum,et al.  Evidence for feature perturbations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  B. Julesz Spatial nonlinearities in the instantaneous perception of textures with identical power spectra. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  L. Smith Importance of the overall similarity of objects of adults' and children's classifications. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Jeff Miller Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[24]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  Principles of feature integration in visual perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.