Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia

Objectives Early child development may have important consequences for inequalities in health and well-being. This paper explores population level patterns of child development across Australian jurisdictions, considering socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. Design Census of child development across Australia. Setting and participants Teachers complete a developmental checklist, the Australian Early Development Index (AEDI), for all children in their first year of full-time schooling. Between May and July 2009, the AEDI was collected by 14 628 teachers in primary schools (government and non-government) across Australia, providing information on 261 147 children (approximately 97.5% of the estimated 5-year-old population). Outcome measures Level of developmental vulnerability in Australian children for five developmental domains: physical well-being, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills and communication skills and general knowledge. Results The results show demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in child development as well as within and between jurisdiction inequalities. The magnitude of the overall level of inequality in child development and the impact of covariates varies considerably both between and within jurisdiction by sex. For example, the difference in overall developmental vulnerability between the best-performing and worst-performing jurisdiction is 12.5% for males and 7.1% for females. Levels of absolute social inequality within jurisdictions range from 8.2% for females to 12.7% for males. Conclusions The different mix of universal and targeted services provided within jurisdictions from pregnancy to age 5 may contribute to inequality across the country. These results illustrate the potential utility of a developmental census to shed light on the impact of differences in universal and targeted services to support child development by school entry.

[1]  William F. McComas,et al.  Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) , 2014 .

[2]  S. Brinkman,et al.  Associations Between the Early Development Instrument at Age 5, and Reading and Numeracy Skills at Ages 8, 10 and 12: a Prospective Linked Data Study , 2013 .

[3]  Des Gasper,et al.  An Analysis of the Human Development Report 2011: Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All† , 2013 .

[4]  J. Klugman Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All , 2011 .

[5]  W. Barnett Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention , 2011, Science.

[6]  E. Duku,et al.  Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Early Development Instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica , 2011 .

[7]  M. Brownell,et al.  Administrative record linkage as a tool for public health research. , 2011, Annual review of public health.

[8]  Tim Moore,et al.  Centre for Community Child Health , 2011 .

[9]  Paul,et al.  Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision , 2011 .

[10]  E. Annandale Changes in the editorial team and innovations at Social Science & Medicine. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[11]  M. Sawyer,et al.  Inequalities in child healthy development: some challenges for effective implementation. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[12]  A. Chandra,et al.  Rising up with shoe leather? A comment on Fair Society, Healthy Lives (the Marmot Review). , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[13]  C. Hertzman,et al.  How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. , 2010, Annual review of public health.

[14]  Michael Marmot,et al.  Fair society, healthy lives : the Marmot Review : strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. , 2010 .

[15]  S. Silburn,et al.  The Process and Policy Challenges of Adapting and Implementing the Early Development Instrument in Australia , 2009 .

[16]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Top Incomes in the Long Run of History , 2009 .

[17]  Jianghong Li,et al.  Response to ‘Reply to Li, D'Angiulli, and Kendall: The Early Development Index and children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds’ by Janus, Hertzman, Guhn, Brinkman, and Goldfeld , 2009 .

[18]  C. Hertzman,et al.  Reply to Li, D'Angiulli and Kendall: The Early Development Index and children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds , 2009 .

[19]  C. Hertzman,et al.  Making early childhood count , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[20]  D. T. Rowley Dysfluency: Stuttering and Cluttering , 2009 .

[21]  S. Brinkman,et al.  Population monitoring of language and cognitive development in Australia: The Australian Early Development Index , 2009 .

[22]  A. Dowling,et al.  Preschool education in Australia , 2009 .

[23]  A. J. Bass,et al.  A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system. , 2008, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[24]  J. Heckman Schools, Skills, and Synapses , 2008, Economic inquiry.

[25]  S. Silburn,et al.  Investigating the Validity of the Australian Early Development Index , 2007 .

[26]  R. Tremblay,et al.  Predicting Early School Achievement With the EDI: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study , 2007 .

[27]  E. Duku,et al.  The School Entry Gap: Socioeconomic, Family, and Health Factors Associated With Children's School Readiness to Learn , 2007 .

[28]  Jianghong Li,et al.  The Early Development Index and children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds , 2007 .

[29]  D. Offord,et al.  Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): A measure of children's school readiness. , 2007 .

[30]  L. Richardson,et al.  Early Child Development : From Measurement to Action , 2007 .

[31]  Efa global monitoring report team Strong foundations : early childhood care and education , 2006 .

[32]  S. Zubrick,et al.  The Western Australian Aboriginal Child Health Survey: Strengthening the Capacity of Aboriginal Children, Families and Communities. , 2006 .

[33]  U. Mishra,et al.  Early Childhood Care and Education , 2020, Indian Pediatrics.

[34]  J. Lynch,et al.  A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. , 2005, Annual review of public health.

[35]  John Lynch,et al.  Methods for Measuring Cancer Disparities: Using Data Relevant to Healthy People 2010 Cancer-Related Objectives , 2005 .

[36]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations , 2004 .

[37]  C. Victora,et al.  Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough , 2003, The Lancet.

[38]  J. Church Human Development Report , 2001 .

[39]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Complexity of electrocortical dynamics in children: developmental aspects. , 2000, Developmental psychobiology.

[40]  Cohen-Cole Zanella Economic Inquiry , 2000 .

[41]  Robert W. Thatcher,et al.  Gender Differences in the Development of EEG Coherence in Normal Children , 1999 .

[42]  J. Cohn,et al.  Gender differences in emotional expressivity and self-regulation during early infancy. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[43]  A. Wagstaff,et al.  On the measurement of inequalities in health. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[44]  Status of the Convention on the Rights of the Child , 1990, International Journal of Legal Information.

[45]  S. Meisels Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at risk? , 1989, Pediatrics.

[46]  David B. Walden,et al.  Report of the Secretary-General , 1989 .

[47]  S. Meisels Developmental screening in early childhood: the interaction of research and social policy. , 1988, Annual review of public health.

[48]  Anderson Ja Child health centres. , 1968 .