Whole-procedure clinical accuracy of Gamma Knife treatments of large lesionsa).

The mechanical accuracy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on single-isocenter measurement has been established to within 0.3mm. However, the full delivery accuracy for Gamma Knife treatments of large lesions has only been estimated via the quadrature-sum analysis. In this study, the authors directly measured the whole-procedure accuracy for Gamma Knife treatments of large lesions to examine the validity of such estimation. The measurements were conducted on a head-phantom simulating the whole treatment procedure that included frame placement, computed tomography imaging, treatment planning, and treatment delivery. The results of the measurements were compared with the dose calculations from the treatment planning system. Average agreements of 0.1-1.6mm for the isodose lines ranging from 25% to 90% of the maximum dose were found despite potentially large contributing uncertainties such as 3-mm imaging resolution, 2-mm dose grid size, 1-mm frame registration, multi-isocenter deliveries, etc. The results of our measurements were found to be significantly smaller (>50%) than the calculated value based on the quadrature-sum analysis. In conclusion, Gamma Knife treatments of large lesions can be delivered much more accurately than predicted from the quadrature-sum analysis of major sources of uncertainties from each step of the delivery chain.

[1]  Steven D Chang,et al.  A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CYBERKNIFE SPINAL RADIOSURGERY USING SKELETAL STRUCTURE TRACKING , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Berndt Wowra,et al.  Quality assurance in stereotactic space. A system test for verifying the accuracy of aim in radiosurgery. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  G Luxton,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery: principles and comparison of treatment methods. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[4]  K. Stelzer,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery: a review and comparison of methods. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  K. P. Ng,et al.  Comparative study of treatment dose plans after the refinement of Leksell Gamma Knife® single-beam dose profiles. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  Steven D Chang,et al.  An Analysis of the Accuracy of the CyberKnife: A Robotic Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgical System , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[7]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Physics of gamma knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  L. Verhey,et al.  Effects of residual target motion for image-tracked spine radiosurgery. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  J. Adler,et al.  An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study of the Accuracy of CyberKnife Spinal Radiosurgery , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[10]  Subhash C. Sharma,et al.  Commissioning and acceptance testing of a CyberKnife linear accelerator , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  L. Verhey,et al.  Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on physical dose distributions. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M J Murphy,et al.  The accuracy of dose localization for an image-guided frameless radiosurgery system. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  Experimentally determined three-dimensional dose distributions in small complex targets. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase II study of high central dose Gamma Knife radiosurgery and marimastat in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.