Sensor-Enabled RFID System for Monitoring Arm Activity: Reliability and Validity

After stroke, capacity to complete tasks in the treatment setting with the more-affected arm is an unreliable index of actual use of that extremity in daily life. Available objective methods for monitoring real-world arm use rely on placing movement sensors on patients. These methods provide information on amount but not type of arm activity, e.g., functional versus nonfunctional movement. This paper presents an approach that places sensors on patients and household objects, overcoming this limitation. An accelerometer and the transmitter component of a radio-frequency proximity sensor are attached to objects; the receiver component is attached to the arm of interest. The receiver triggers an on-board radio-frequency identification tag to signal proximity when that arm is within 23 cm of an instrumented object. In benchmark testing, this system detected perfectly which arm was used to move the target object on 200 trials. In a laboratory study with 35 undergraduates, increasing the amount of time target objects were moved with the arm of interest resulted in a corresponding increase in system output (p <; 0.0001) . Moreover, measurement error was low (≤2.5%). The results support this system's reliability and validity in individuals with unimpaired movement; testing is now warranted in stroke patients.

[1]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes : Lessons from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2005 .

[3]  Eric Wade,et al.  Motor function assessment using wearable inertial sensors , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[4]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Comparison of RFID Systems for Tracking Clinical Interventions at the Bedside , 2008, AMIA.

[5]  E. Taub,et al.  Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. , 2000, Stroke.

[6]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[7]  Anh Dinh,et al.  Sensor evaluation for tracking upper extremity prosthesis movements in a virtual environment , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Elaine Strachota,et al.  Low-cost monitoring of patients during unsupervised robot/computer assisted motivating stroke rehabilitation , 2011, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[9]  S. Yoo,et al.  Design of RFID based the Patient Management and Tracking System in hospital , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  Sensor-enabled RFID system for monitoring arm activity in daily life , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Paul D. Franzon,et al.  Overview of RFID technology and its applications in the food industry. , 2009, Journal of food science.

[12]  P. Clark,et al.  Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[13]  Jeff Kabachinski,et al.  An introduction to RFID. , 2005, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[14]  Daniel P. Redmond,et al.  Observations on the design and specification of a wrist-worn human activity monitoring system , 1985 .

[15]  S. Engelborghs,et al.  Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.