Switching the Immunogenicity of Peptide Assemblies Using Surface Properties.

Biomaterials created from supramolecular peptides, proteins, and their derivatives have been receiving increasing interest for both immunological applications, such as vaccines and immunotherapies, as well as ostensibly nonimmunological applications, such as therapeutic delivery or tissue engineering. However, simple rules for either maximizing immunogenicity or abolishing it have yet to be elucidated, even though immunogenicity is a prime consideration for the design of any supramolecular biomaterial intended for use in vivo. Here, we investigated a range of physicochemical properties of fibrillized peptide biomaterials, identifying negative surface charge as a means for completely abolishing antibody and T cell responses against them in mice, even when they display a competent epitope. The work was facilitated by the modularity of the materials, which enabled the generation of a set of co-assembled fibrillar peptide materials with broad ranges of surface properties. It was found that negative surface charge, provided via negatively charged amino acid residues, prevented T cell and antibody responses to antigen-carrying assemblies because it prevented uptake of the materials by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), which in turn prevented presentation of the epitope peptide in the APCs' major histocompatibility class II molecules. Conversely, positive surface charge augmented the uptake of fibrillized peptides by APCs. These findings suggest that some surface characteristics, such as extensive negative charge, should be avoided in vaccine design using supramolecular peptide assemblies. More importantly, it provides a strategy to switch off potentially problematic immunogenicity for using these materials in nonimmunological applications.

[1]  Joel H Collier,et al.  Modulating adaptive immune responses to peptide self-assemblies. , 2012, ACS nano.

[2]  J. Babensee,et al.  The effect of the physical form of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) carriers on the humoral immune response to co-delivered antigen. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[3]  Joel H Collier,et al.  Supramolecular peptide vaccines: tuning adaptive immunity. , 2015, Current opinion in immunology.

[4]  Sven Frokjaer,et al.  Particle size and surface charge affect particle uptake by human dendritic cells in an in vitro model. , 2005, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[5]  Samuel I Stupp,et al.  Tissue-Factor Targeted Peptide Amphiphile Nanofibers as an Injectable Therapy To Control Hemorrhage. , 2016, ACS nano.

[6]  Martin F. Bachmann,et al.  Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns , 2010, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[7]  Matthew V. Tirrell,et al.  Peptide Amphiphile Micelles Self-Adjuvant Group A Streptococcal Vaccination , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[8]  J. Collier,et al.  Controllably degradable β-sheet nanofibers and gels from self-assembling depsipeptides. , 2013, Biomaterials science.

[9]  Pim W. J. M. Frederix,et al.  MMP-9 triggered micelle-to-fibre transitions for slow release of doxorubicin. , 2015, Biomaterials science.

[10]  A. Rich,et al.  Extensive neurite outgrowth and active synapse formation on self-assembling peptide scaffolds. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Joel H Collier,et al.  The use of self-adjuvanting nanofiber vaccines to elicit high-affinity B cell responses to peptide antigens without inflammation. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[12]  Darrell J Irvine,et al.  Engineering synthetic vaccines using cues from natural immunity. , 2013, Nature materials.

[13]  Shuguang Zhang,et al.  Controlled release of functional proteins through designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogel scaffold , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  D. Pochan,et al.  Beta Hairpin Peptide Hydrogels as an Injectable Solid Vehicle for Neurotrophic Growth Factor Delivery. , 2015, Biomacromolecules.

[15]  D. Irvine,et al.  Synthetic Nanoparticles for Vaccines and Immunotherapy. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[16]  Christophe Egles,et al.  Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds Accelerate Wound Healing , 2008, PloS one.

[17]  Sai T Reddy,et al.  Exploiting lymphatic transport and complement activation in nanoparticle vaccines , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Yvonne Perrie,et al.  Liposomal cationic charge and antigen adsorption are important properties for the efficient deposition of antigen at the injection site and ability of the vaccine to induce a CMI response. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[19]  Rima McLeod,et al.  Effectiveness of a novel immunogenic nanoparticle platform for Toxoplasma peptide vaccine in HLA transgenic mice. , 2014, Vaccine.

[20]  Joel H. Collier,et al.  Gradated assembly of multiple proteins into supramolecular nanomaterials , 2014, Nature materials.

[21]  J. Hartgerink,et al.  Self-assembling multidomain peptides tailor biological responses through biphasic release. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[22]  Samuel I. Stupp,et al.  25th Anniversary Article: Supramolecular Materials for Regenerative Medicine , 2014, Advanced materials.

[23]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  J. Collier,et al.  Thermal stability of self-assembled peptide vaccine materials. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[25]  Matthew Tirrell,et al.  Self‐Assembled Peptide Amphiphile Micelles Containing a Cytotoxic T‐Cell Epitope Promote a Protective Immune Response In Vivo , 2012, Advanced materials.

[26]  J. DeSimone,et al.  Nanoparticle surface charge impacts distribution, uptake and lymph node trafficking by pulmonary antigen-presenting cells. , 2016, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[27]  Cui Tang,et al.  Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[28]  Joseph M. DeSimone,et al.  Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  Satish Mishra,et al.  Self-assembled peptide nanofibers raising durable antibody responses against a malaria epitope. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[30]  J. Hartgerink,et al.  Drug-triggered and cross-linked self-assembling nanofibrous hydrogels. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Eleonore Fröhlich,et al.  The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[32]  Dimitri Vanhecke,et al.  Uptake efficiency of surface modified gold nanoparticles does not correlate with functional changes and cytokine secretion in human dendritic cells in vitro. , 2015, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[33]  Jangwook P. Jung,et al.  Co-assembling peptides as defined matrices for endothelial cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[34]  J. Schneider,et al.  Arginine-rich self-assembling peptides as potent antibacterial gels. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[35]  Jing-Wen Ma,et al.  A totally synthetic, self-assembling, adjuvant-free MUC1 glycopeptide vaccine for cancer therapy. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  Yifan Ma,et al.  The role of surface charge density in cationic liposome-promoted dendritic cell maturation and vaccine-induced immune responses. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[37]  Jangwook P. Jung,et al.  Multi-component extracellular matrices based on peptide self-assembly. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[38]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Shape and size-dependent immune response to antigen-carrying nanoparticles. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[39]  E. Gawalt,et al.  Antibody-functionalized peptidic membranes for neutralization of allogeneic skin antigen-presenting cells. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[40]  E. Gawalt,et al.  Retaining antibodies in tumors with a self-assembling injectable system. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[41]  S. Meredith,et al.  Chaperone-like N-methyl peptide inhibitors of polyglutamine aggregation. , 2010, Biochemistry.

[42]  Bing Xu,et al.  Supramolecular Nanofibrils Inhibit Cancer Progression In Vitro and In Vivo , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[43]  J. Ting,et al.  Controlled analysis of nanoparticle charge on mucosal and systemic antibody responses following pulmonary immunization , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  A. Waggoner,et al.  Local retention of antibodies in vivo with an injectable film embedded with a fluorogen-activating protein. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[45]  Jangwook P. Jung,et al.  A self-assembling peptide acting as an immune adjuvant , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Vladimir P Torchilin,et al.  Cationic charge determines the distribution of liposomes between the vascular and extravascular compartments of tumors. , 2002, Cancer research.

[47]  Arthur Fridman,et al.  Titrating T‐Cell Epitopes within Self‐Assembled Vaccines Optimizes CD4+ Helper T Cell and Antibody Outputs , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[48]  Bing Xu,et al.  Self‐Delivery Multifunctional Anti‐HIV Hydrogels for Sustained Release , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[49]  Fakhrul Ahsan,et al.  Influence of surface charge of PLGA particles of recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen in enhancing systemic and mucosal immune responses. , 2009, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[50]  Jie Zhou,et al.  Enzyme-Instructed Self-Assembly of Small d-Peptides as a Multiple-Step Process for Selectively Killing Cancer Cells , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[51]  J. Collier,et al.  Directed intermixing in multicomponent self-assembling biomaterials. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.