A statistical finite element model of the knee accounting for shape and alignment variability.

By characterizing anatomical differences in size and shape between subjects, statistical shape models enable population-based evaluations in biomechanics. Statistical models have largely focused on individual bones with application to implant sizing, bone fracture and osteoarthritis; however, in joint mechanics applications, the statistical models must consider the geometry of multiple structures of a joint and their relative position. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to develop a statistical shape and alignment modeling (SSAM) approach to characterize the intersubject variability in bone morphology and alignment for the structures of the knee, to demonstrate the statistical model's ability to describe variability in a training set and to generate realistic instances for use in finite element evaluation of joint mechanics. The statistical model included representations of the bone and cartilage for the femur, tibia and patella from magnetic resonance images and relative alignment of the structures at a known, loaded position in an experimental knee simulator for a training set of 20 specimens. The statistical model described relationships or modes of variation in shape and relative alignment of the knee structures. By generating new 'virtual subjects' with physiologically realistic knee anatomy, the modeling approach can efficiently perform investigations into joint mechanics and implant design which benefit from population-based considerations.

[1]  M. Pandy,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Musculoskeletal Model of the Human Knee Joint. Part 1: Theoretical Construction , 1997 .

[2]  David FitzPatrick,et al.  Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices. , 2007, The Knee.

[3]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R. Barrack,et al.  Do Patient-specific Guides Improve Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  J. Elias,et al.  Computational assessment of the influence of vastus medialis obliquus function on patellofemoral pressures: model evaluation. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Agnes Grünerbl,et al.  Trabecular Bone Analysis in CT and X-Ray Images of the Proximal Femur for the Assessment of Local Bone Quality , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Combined probabilistic and principal component analysis approach for multivariate sensitivity evaluation and application to implanted patellofemoral mechanics. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Saikat Pal,et al.  Effect of variability in anatomical landmark location on knee kinematic description , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  L. Maletsky,et al.  Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Frances T Sheehan,et al.  Correlating femoral shape with patellar kinematics in patients with patellofemoral pain , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  M. Bendjaballah,et al.  Biomechanics of the human knee joint in compression: reconstruction, mesh generation and finite element analysis , 1995 .

[14]  P J Laz,et al.  A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Evaluation of image features and search strategies for segmentation of bone structures in radiographs using Active Shape Models , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  i) Registration techniques for computer navigation , 2007 .

[17]  Paul J. Rullkoetter,et al.  Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[18]  Lorin P Maletsky,et al.  Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Biomechanical robustness of a new proximal epiphyseal hip replacement to patient variability and surgical uncertainties: a FE study. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Predicting the shapes of bones at a joint: application to the shoulder , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Development of a statistical shape model of the patellofemoral joint for investigating relationships between shape and function. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[23]  Daniel J Berry,et al.  Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  I. Jolliffe.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[25]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Relative contributions of design, alignment, and loading variability in knee replacement mechanics , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Building a statistical shape model of the pelvis , 2004, CARS.

[28]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: Laboratory validation and clinical experience , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Alignment With Patient-specific Positioning Guides Compared With Manual Instrumentation in TKA , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  Travis D. Eliason,et al.  Statistical shape modeling describes variation in tibia and femur surface geometry between Control and Incidence groups from the osteoarthritis initiative database. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Peter J Hunter,et al.  Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Comparison of patellar bone strain in the natural and implanted knee during simulated deep flexion , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Biomechanics of the knee joint in flexion under various quadriceps forces. , 2005, The Knee.

[35]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Computationally efficient finite element evaluation of natural patellofemoral mechanics. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[36]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[37]  Lorin P Maletsky,et al.  Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.