Hierarchy, causation and explanation: ubiquity, locality and pluralism

The ubiquity of top-down causal explanations within and across the sciences is prima facie evidence for the existence of top-down causation. Much debate has been focused on whether top-down causation is coherent or in conflict with reductionism. Less attention has been given to the question of whether these representations of hierarchical relations pick out a single, common hierarchy. A negative answer to this question undermines a commonplace view that the world is divided into stratified ‘levels’ of organization and suggests that attributions of causal responsibility in different hierarchical representations may not have a meaningful basis for comparison. Representations used in top-down and bottom-up explanations are primarily ‘local’ and tied to distinct domains of science, illustrated here by protein structure and folding. This locality suggests that no single metaphysical account of hierarchy for causal relations to obtain within emerges from the epistemology of scientific explanation. Instead, a pluralist perspective is recommended—many different kinds of top-down causation (explanation) can exist alongside many different kinds of bottom-up causation (explanation). Pluralism makes plausible why different senses of top-down causation can be coherent and not in conflict with reductionism, thereby illustrating a productive interface between philosophical analysis and scientific inquiry.

[1]  J. Frydman,et al.  Folding and Quality Control of the VHL Tumor Suppressor Proceed through Distinct Chaperone Pathways , 2005, Cell.

[2]  C. Craver Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience , 2007 .

[3]  F. Hartl,et al.  Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Structural Features of the GroEL-GroES Nano-Cage Required for Rapid Folding of Encapsulated Protein , 2007 .

[4]  N. Block Do Causal Powers Drain Away , 2003 .

[5]  J. Ladyman,et al.  Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized , 2007 .

[6]  C. Anfinsen Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[7]  Reduction, Hierarchies and Organicism , 1974 .

[8]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[9]  B. Honig Protein folding: from the levinthal paradox to structure prediction. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Navigating the Chaperone Network: An Integrative Map of Physical and Genetic Interactions Mediated by the Hsp90 Chaperone , 2005, Cell.

[11]  Wilfrid S. Sellars,et al.  PHILOSOPHY AND THE SCIENTIFIC IMAGE OF MAN , 2007 .

[12]  A. Horwich Protein folding in the cell: an inside story , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[13]  Jonathan Schaffer,et al.  Is There a Fundamental Level , 2003 .

[14]  William Bechtel,et al.  Top-down Causation Without Top-down Causes , 2007 .

[15]  C. Craver Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience , 2007 .

[16]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2009 .

[17]  Timothy O'Connor,et al.  Emergence in Science and Philosophy , 2010 .

[18]  M. Feder,et al.  Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. , 1999, Annual review of physiology.

[19]  J. Ladyman,et al.  In defence of scientism , 2007 .

[20]  Alexander Rosenberg REDUCTIONISM IN BIOLOGY , 2007 .

[21]  A. Love,et al.  Aspects of Reductive Explanation in Biological Science: Intrinsicality, Fundamentality, and Temporality , 2011, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[22]  M. Bradie :Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality , 2008 .

[23]  A. Marras,et al.  Kim’s Supervenience Argument and Nonreductive Physicalism , 2007 .

[24]  Zubair Khanzada,et al.  The use of pre-operative computed tomography in the assessment of the acute abdomen , 2012, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[25]  Stephen H. Kellert,et al.  Introduction The Pluralist Stance , 2008 .

[26]  Robert C. Bishop,et al.  Downward causation in fluid convection , 2006, Synthese.

[27]  Carl Gillett,et al.  Moving beyond the subset model of realization: The problem of qualitative distinctness in the metaphysics of science , 2010, Synthese.

[28]  Michael F. Goodman,et al.  What Is a Person? , 1988, Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society.

[29]  Alan C. Love,et al.  COMPARING PART-WHOLE REDUCTIVE EXPLANATIONS IN BIOLOGY AND PHYSICS , 2011 .

[30]  S. Salthe Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation , 1985 .

[31]  R. Service,et al.  Problem Solved* (*sort of) , 2008, Science.

[32]  István A. Kovács,et al.  Systems biology of molecular chaperone networks. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[33]  Dirar Homouz,et al.  Crowded, cell-like environment induces shape changes in aspherical protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  Wandering significance : an essay on conceptual behavior , 2006 .

[35]  C. Glymour,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , 2004 .

[36]  Frederick Ferré,et al.  Introduction to positive philosophy , 1970 .

[37]  A. I.,et al.  Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure–Function Partitioning of Cognitive–Emotional Brain Networks , 2023, Biology.

[38]  J. Frydman Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[39]  James W. Valentine,et al.  Hierarchies in biology and paleontology , 1996, Paleobiology.

[40]  E. Kalko,et al.  Top-Down Control of Herbivory by Birds and Bats in the Canopy of Temperate Broad-Leaved Oaks (Quercus robur) , 2011, PloS one.

[41]  F. Hartl,et al.  Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[42]  R. Ellis Steric chaperones. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[43]  R. Ellis Macromolecular crowding : obvious but underappreciated , 2022 .

[44]  C. Dobson Protein folding and misfolding , 2003, Nature.

[45]  Jaegwon Kim Physicalism, or Something Near Enough , 2005 .

[46]  Yun-chi Tang,et al.  Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[47]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  Genetics and reductionism , 1998 .

[48]  A. Love From Philosophy to Science (To Natural Philosophy): Evolutionary Developmental Perspectives , 2008, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[49]  Timothy O’Connor,et al.  EMERGENT PROPERTIES , 2021 .

[50]  Alan C. Love,et al.  Evolutionary morphology and Evo-devo: Hierarchy and novelty , 2006, Theory in Biosciences.

[51]  Patricia L Clark,et al.  Protein folding in the cell: reshaping the folding funnel. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[52]  Stuart Glennan,et al.  Mechanisms, Causes and the Layered Model of the World , 2010 .

[53]  Christian A. Smith,et al.  What Is a Person?: Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up , 2010 .

[54]  I. Tinoco,et al.  RNA folding and unfolding. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[55]  Thomas Nyström,et al.  Genomic buffering mitigates the effects of deleterious mutations in bacteria , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[56]  J. Frydman,et al.  Systems Analyses Reveal Two Chaperone Networks with Distinct Functions in Eukaryotic Cells , 2006, Cell.

[57]  D. Campbell ‘Downward Causation’ in Hierarchically Organised Biological Systems , 1974 .

[58]  Walter N. Moss,et al.  Folding and finding RNA secondary structure. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[59]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Contextual Emergence in the Description of Properties , 2006 .

[60]  R. Persaud Philosophy of science , 1992, The Lancet.