DTT device: Conceptual design of the superconducting magnet system

Abstract In the European Fusion Roadmap, one of the main challenges to be faced is the risk mitigation related to the impossibility of directly extrapolate to DEMO the divertor solution adopted in ITER, due to the very large loads expected. Thus, a satellite experimental facility oriented toward the exploration of robust divertor solutions for power and particles exhaust and to the study of plasma-material interaction scaled to long pulse operation, is currently being designed. Clearly, design requirements for this experiment are quite challenging, to account for the extreme operation conditions, which shall be as representative as possible of the DEMO ones, but in a much smaller device and at lower costs. A feasibility assessment has been carried out for the fully superconducting magnet system of the compact Divertor Tokamak Test (DTT) facility project. The overall magnet system is based on NbTi and Nb 3 Sn Cable-in-Conduit Conductors, and it adopts some of the most recent developments in this field. It consists of 18 Toroidal Field (TF), 6 Poloidal Field (PF) and 6 Central Solenoid (CS) module coils. In order to cope with the machine requirements such as plasma major and minor radii, magnetic field on plasma axis, plasma current, and inductive flux requirement, the Nb 3 Sn TF coil is characterized by a peak field of 11.4 T on the conductor, operating at 46.3 kA; the Nb 3 Sn CS modules are characterized by a peak field of about 13 T, with a conductor operating current of 23 kA; the PF coils are wound using NbTi conductors operating at a maximum peak field of 4.0 T, with operating currents in the range 21 kA to 25 kA, depending on the PF coil. Profiting of the compact machine size, and thus of relatively short conductor lengths, the TF coil winding pack is conceived as layer wound and made of two distinct sections, a low- and a high-field one, employing different superconductor cross-sections, and electrically connected through an embedded “ENEA-type” joint. The main features of the magnet system are described here; the results of mechanical, electrical and thermo-hydraulic analyses, which are discussed here, indicate that the proposed design fulfills all the required criteria. In addition, a brief description of the In-Vessel coils is given, though they are not superconducting, for the sake of completeness.

[1]  L. Muzzi,et al.  Joint Design for the EDIPO , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[2]  Simonetta Turtu,et al.  Detailed design of the large-bore 8 T superconducting magnet for the NAFASSY test facility , 2015 .

[3]  Roadmap to the Realisation of Fusion Energy , 2022 .

[4]  Luca Bottura,et al.  JC (B, T, ε) Parameterization for the ITER Nb3Sn Production , 2009 .

[5]  E. Salpietro,et al.  Design and Procurement of the European Dipole (EDIPO) Superconducting Magnet , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[6]  L. Muzzi,et al.  Successful performances of the EU-AltTF sample, a large size Nb3Sn cable-in-conduit conductor with rectangular geometry , 2010 .

[7]  M. L. Apicella,et al.  The DTT device: Safety, fuelling and auxiliary system , 2017 .

[8]  Huan Jin,et al.  Electromagnetic Analysis of the ITER Upper VS Coil , 2014 .

[9]  Laura Savoldi,et al.  Development of a Thermal-Hydraulic Model for the European DEMO TF Coil , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[10]  R. Wesche,et al.  Test Results of a ${\rm Nb}_{3}{\rm Sn}$ Cable-in-Conduit Conductor With Variable Pitch Sequence , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[11]  Neil Mitchell,et al.  Analysis of the Effects of the Nuclear Heat Load on the ITER TF Magnets Temperature Margin , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[12]  Marco Evangelos Biancolini,et al.  A new meshless approach to map electromagnetic loads for FEM analysis on DEMO TF coil system , 2015 .

[13]  H. Weijers,et al.  Electromagnetic Cycling and Strain Effects on ${\rm Nb}_{3}{\rm Sn}$ Cable-in-Conduit Conductors With Variations in Cabling Design and Conduit Material Properties , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[14]  Modified friction factor correlation for CICC"s based on a porous media analogy , 2011 .

[15]  Luca Bottura,et al.  Parameterization for the ITER Production , 2009 .

[16]  R. Albanese,et al.  Finite Element Methods for the Solution of 3D Eddy Current Problems , 1997 .

[17]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[19]  A Bonito-Oliva,et al.  Conceptual Design of the 45 T Hybrid Magnet at the Nijmegen High Field Magnet Laboratory , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[20]  H. Cloez,et al.  JT-60SA TF Coils: Experimental Check of Hydraulic Operating Conditions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[21]  A. della Corte,et al.  ${\rm Nb}_{3}{\rm Sn}$ Cable-in-Conduit Conductor Fabrication for the Series-Connected Hybrid Magnets , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[22]  L. Zani,et al.  Completion of TF Strand Production and Progress of TF Conductor Manufacture for JT-60SA Project , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[23]  R. Zanino,et al.  Computation of JT-60SA TF coil temperature margin using the 4C code , 2011 .

[24]  A. della Corte,et al.  Cable-in-conduit conductors: lessons from the recent past for future developments with low and high temperature superconductors , 2015 .

[25]  F. Crisanti,et al.  The DTT device: Poloidal field coil assessment for alternative plasma configurations , 2017 .

[26]  A. della Corte,et al.  Design, Manufacture, and Test of an 80 kA-Class Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductor With Rectangular Geometry and Distributed Pressure Relief Channels , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[28]  N. Mitchell,et al.  Challenges and status of ITER conductor production , 2014 .

[29]  N. N. Martovetsky,et al.  Qualification of the Joints for the ITER Central Solenoid , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[30]  Francesco Casella,et al.  The 4C code for the cryogenic circuit conductor and coil modeling in ITER , 2010 .