Pivotal Role of Mesophyll Conductance in Shaping Photosynthetic Performance across 67 Structurally Diverse Gymnosperm Species

Premise of research. Recent research on evolutionarily old species has uncovered mesophyll conductance (gm) as a key player in realized assimilation, but considerable variation was found. However, in gymnosperms, photosynthetic limitations, particularly how limitation combinations contribute to realized photosynthetic rates, have been studied in very few species, precluding any broad conclusions about the share of different controls and hindering reliable global modeling of the gymnosperm forest’s contributions to the global carbon cycle and responses to climate change. Methodology. Using combined gas exchange and fluorescence measurements, we studied photosynthetic limitations in 67 species of gymnosperms (7% of all extant species) to uncover the share of photosynthetic limitations and the consequences of the variation in gm. These studied species were grown in a common garden but originated from globally contrasting habitats and evolutionary histories and represent species with flat leaves, scales, and needle-shaped foliage. Pivotal results. Remarkably, gm varied 21-fold, extending almost across the whole range of values observed in vascular plants to date, and this variation was associated with 6- and 12-fold differences in the net assimilation rate per area and mass and with more than 3-fold differences in the CO2 drawdown from the intercellular airspace to chloroplasts. Photosynthetic limitation analysis revealed that mesophyll and stomatal limitations were dominant, correspondingly spanning 8%–72% and 5%–57% of the total photosynthetic limitation. Both limitations were correlated with foliage structural characteristics, challenging the hypothesis that the phylogenetic background of a species directly determines the partitioning of photosynthetic limitations. Conclusions. The results of the current study emphasize that highly variable gymnosperm leaf structure results in major variations in mesophyll diffusion conductance that needs to be included in carbon gain estimations, especially in evolutionarily old species.

[1]  J. Flexas,et al.  Anatomical constraints to nonstomatal diffusion conductance and photosynthesis in lycophytes and bryophytes. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[2]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Effects of mesophyll conductance on vegetation responses to elevated CO2 concentrations in a land surface model , 2019, Global change biology.

[3]  T. Tosens,et al.  Mesophyll conductance and accurate photosynthetic carbon gain calculations. , 2018, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Structural controls on photosynthetic capacity through juvenile‐to‐adult transition and needle ageing in Mediterranean pines , 2018 .

[5]  J. Flexas,et al.  Differential coordination of stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and leaf hydraulic conductance in response to changing light across species. , 2018, Plant, cell & environment.

[6]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[7]  J. Flexas,et al.  Cell-level anatomical characteristics explain high mesophyll conductance and photosynthetic capacity in sclerophyllous Mediterranean oaks. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[8]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Extremely thick cell walls and low mesophyll conductance: welcome to the world of ancient living! , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[9]  R. Guy,et al.  Substantial role for carbonic anhydrase in latitudinal variation in mesophyll conductance of Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.

[10]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Two tropical conifers show strong growth and water-use efficiency responses to altered CO2 concentration. , 2016, Annals of botany.

[11]  P. Cox,et al.  Improved representation of plant functional types and physiology in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES v4.2) using plant trait information , 2016 .

[12]  H. Stützel,et al.  A Modeling Approach to Quantify the Effects of Stomatal Behavior and Mesophyll Conductance on Leaf Water Use Efficiency , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[13]  Chuangdao Jiang,et al.  Variability of mesophyll conductance and its relationship with water use efficiency in cotton leaves under drought pretreatment. , 2016, Journal of plant physiology.

[14]  J. Flexas,et al.  Light acclimation of photosynthesis in two closely related firs (Abies pinsapo Boiss. and Abies alba Mill.): the role of leaf anatomy and mesophyll conductance to CO2. , 2016, Tree physiology.

[15]  J. Flexas,et al.  The photosynthetic capacity in 35 ferns and fern allies: mesophyll CO2 diffusion as a key trait. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[16]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Leaf Mass per Area (LMA) and Its Relationship with Leaf Structure and Anatomy in 34 Mediterranean Woody Species along a Water Availability Gradient , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  R. Guy,et al.  Leaf mass per area predicts palisade structural properties linked to mesophyll conductance in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L.) , 2016 .

[18]  J. Flexas,et al.  Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study. , 2015, Plant, cell & environment.

[19]  M. Stoffel,et al.  Hydrophobia of gymnosperms: myth or reality? A global analysis , 2015 .

[20]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Kattge,et al.  Plant functional types in Earth system models: past experiences and future directions for application of dynamic vegetation models in high-latitude ecosystems. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[22]  C. Warren,et al.  The role of mesophyll conductance in the economics of nitrogen and water use in photosynthesis , 2014, Photosynthesis Research.

[23]  J. Flexas,et al.  Importance of leaf anatomy in determining mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 across species: quantitative limitations and scaling up by models , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[24]  J. Flexas,et al.  Leaf anatomical properties in relation to differences in mesophyll conductance to CO(2) and photosynthesis in two related Mediterranean Abies species. , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[25]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Flexas,et al.  Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. , 2012, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[27]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Anatomical basis of vari tion in mesophyll resistance in eastern Australian sclero hylls : news of a long and winding path , 2012 .

[28]  U. Niinemets,et al.  Developmental changes in mesophyll diffusion conductance and photosynthetic capacity under different light and water availabilities in Populus tremula: how structure constrains function. , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[29]  P. Leadley,et al.  Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[30]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Evergreens favored by higher responsiveness to increased CO₂. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  E. Veneklaas,et al.  Photosynthesis at an extreme end of the leaf trait spectrum: how does it relate to high leaf dry mass per area and associated structural parameters? , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[32]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling , 2009 .

[33]  K. Tu,et al.  Physiological consequences of height-related morphological variation in Sequoia sempervirens foliage. , 2009, Tree physiology.

[34]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO(2) and optimization of water-use efficiency among land plants. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[35]  J. Flexas,et al.  The role of mesophyll conductance during water stress and recovery in tobacco (Nicotiana sylvestris): acclimation or limitation? , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[36]  J. Flexas,et al.  Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[37]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[38]  E. Veneklaas,et al.  Influence of leaf dry mass per area, CO2, and irradiance on mesophyll conductance in sclerophylls. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[39]  I. Wright,et al.  Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[40]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[41]  J. E. Eckenwalder Conifers of the World: The Complete Reference , 2009 .

[42]  C. Warren,et al.  Stand aside Stomata, Another Actor Deserves Centre Stage: the Forgotten Role of the Internal Conductance to Co 2 Transfer , 2022 .

[43]  J. Flexas,et al.  Mesophyll conductance to CO 2 : current knowledge and future prospects , 2008 .

[44]  A. Cescatti,et al.  Major diffusion leaks of clamp-on leaf cuvettes still unaccounted: how erroneous are the estimates of Farquhar et al. model parameters? , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[45]  J. Berry,et al.  Analysis of leakage in IRGA's leaf chambers of open gas exchange systems: quantification and its effects in photosynthesis parameterization. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[46]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Complex adjustments of photosynthetic potentials and internal diffusion conductance to current and previous light availabilities and leaf age in Mediterranean evergreen species Quercus ilex. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[47]  F. Magnani,et al.  Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees , 2005 .

[48]  B. Osborne,et al.  Interactive effects of irradiance and water availability on the photosynthetic performance of Picea sitchensis seedlings: implications for seedling establishment under different management practices , 2005 .

[49]  J. Flexas,et al.  Rubisco specificity factor tends to be larger in plant species from drier habitats and in species with persistent leaves , 2005 .

[50]  P. Reich,et al.  Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[51]  D. Manter,et al.  A/C(i) curve analysis across a range of woody plant species: influence of regression analysis parameters and mesophyll conductance. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[52]  Tadaki Hirose,et al.  Allocation of nitrogen to cell walls decreases photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency , 2004 .

[53]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[54]  Nigel J. Livingston,et al.  On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model , 2004 .

[55]  P. Reich,et al.  Different photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in deciduous hardwood and evergreen coniferous tree species , 1995, Oecologia.

[56]  R. Oren,et al.  Estimating photosynthetic rate and annual carbon gain in conifers from specific leaf weight and leaf biomass , 1986, Oecologia.

[57]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[58]  Nigel J. Livingston,et al.  Transfer conductance in second growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)Franco) canopies , 2003 .

[59]  D. Whitehead,et al.  The relative limitation of photosynthesis by mesophyll conductance in co-occurring species in a temperate rainforest dominated by the conifer Dacrydium cupressinum. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[60]  X. Le Roux,et al.  Effect of local irradiance on CO(2) transfer conductance of mesophyll in walnut. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[61]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Dependence of needle architecture and chemical composition on canopy light availability in three North American Pinus species with contrasting needle length. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[62]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis , 2001 .

[63]  M. Kent,et al.  Plant functional types: an alternative to taxonomic plant community description in biogeography? , 2000 .

[64]  I. Terashima,et al.  The influence of leaf thickness on the CO2 transfer conductance and leaf stable carbon isotope ratio for some evergreen tree species in Japanese warm‐temperate forests , 1999 .

[65]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  Research review. Components of leaf dry mass per area – thickness and density – alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants , 1999 .

[66]  K. Thompson,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies , 1999 .

[67]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  A. Held,et al.  Dark Leaf Respiration in Light and Darkness of an Evergreen and a Deciduous Plant Species , 1995, Plant physiology.

[69]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO(2). , 1992, Plant physiology.

[70]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[71]  C. Osmond,et al.  Physiological Processes in Plant Ecology: the Structure for a Synthesis , 1980 .